do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Oslo tingrett dated 6 January 2016 in the case of Synnøve Finden v Staten v/Landbruks- og matdepartmentet (Case E-1/16)
Date: 2016-01-06
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: Norway, State aid, aid to agriculture, control of State aid, farm price support, interpretation of the law, milk, right of establishment








C_2017009EN.01003801.xml










12.1.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/38





Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Oslo tingrett dated 6 January 2016 in the case of Synnøve Finden v Staten v/Landbruks- og matdepartmentet
(Case E-1/16)
(2017/C 9/08)
A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter dated 6 January 2016 from Oslo tingrett (the Oslo District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 18 January 2016, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Synnøve Finden v Staten v/Landbruks- og matdepartmentet (the Norwegian State represented by the Ministry of Agriculture and Food) on the following questions concerning Regulation of 29 June 2007 No 832 on a price equalisation system for milk (the ‘PE Regulation’):






1.1.


Is the aid arrangement mentioned in the third paragraph of Section 8 of the PE Regulation an arrangement of a nature whereby the Court, on considering its lawfulness, must consider it in relation to the rules on the freedom of establishment in Article 31 of the EEA Agreement?










1.2.


If the court is required to consider Article 31 of the EEA Agreement in relation to the lawfulness of the third paragraph of Section 8 of the PE Regulation, will Article 31 of the EEA Agreement only be relevant if there is a cross-border element in the case?










1.3.


If the court is required to consider Article 31 of the EEA Agreement in relation to the lawfulness of the third paragraph of Section 8 of the PE Regulation, will Article 31 of the EEA Agreement only be relevant in relation to what are commonly referred to as ‘Protocol 3 products’, or will it be deemed to constitute transport aid of relevance to all product categories, even if transport is limited to the party’s own products?










2.1.


Is the aid arrangement mentioned in the third paragraph of Section 8 of the PE Regulation an arrangement that requires prior notification to ESA pursuant to Article 60 of the EEA Agreement?










2.2.


If the aid arrangement mentioned in the third paragraph of Section 8 of the PE Regulation requires prior notification to ESA pursuant to Article 60, does this only concern what are commonly referred to as ‘Protocol 3 products’, or will it be deemed to constitute transport aid of relevance to all product categories?
Case F-1/16: Action brought on 6 January 2015 — ZZ v Parliament
Date: 2016-01-06
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, in-service training








C_2016111EN.01004501.xml










29.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 111/45





Action brought on 6 January 2015 — ZZ v Parliament
(Case F-1/16)
(2016/C 111/56)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the European Parliament not to include the applicant’s name in the list of officials selected to participate in the training programme for the certification exercise of 2014.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of 27 March 2015 of the Appointing Authority not to include the applicant’s name in the list of officials selected to participate in the training programme for the certification exercise of 2014;










—


Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,05 % on 1 January 2016 — Euro exchange rates
Date: 2016-01-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, financing, interest, money








C_2016002EN.01000101.xml










6.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 2/1





Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
0,05 % on 1 January 2016
Euro exchange rates (2)

5 January 2016
(2016/C 2/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0746




JPY


Japanese yen


127,88




DKK


Danish krone


7,4605




GBP


Pound sterling


0,73235




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2235




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0847




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,5880




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,022




HUF


Hungarian forint


315,20




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3084




RON


Romanian leu


4,5268




TRY


Turkish lira


3,2009




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4982




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4976




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3297




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6001




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5310




KRW


South Korean won


1 277,02




ZAR


South African rand


16,7643




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,0074




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6388




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 879,48




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6670




PHP


Philippine peso


50,371




RUB


Russian rouble


78,8620




THB


Thai baht


38,816




BRL


Brazilian real


4,3023




MXN


Mexican peso


18,5798




INR


Indian rupee


71,5539






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.