do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-180/14: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 December 2015 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2003/88/EC — Organisation of working time — Daily rest — Weekly rest — Maximum weekly working time)
Date: 2015-12-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arrangement of working time, legal working time, physician, weekly rest period








C_2016068EN.01000601.xml










22.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 68/6





Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 December 2015 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
(Case C-180/14) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2003/88/EC - Organisation of working time - Daily rest - Weekly rest - Maximum weekly working time))
(2016/C 068/07)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Patakia and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: A. Samoni-Rantou, N. Dafniou and S. Vodina, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to implement an average weekly working time of not more than 48 hours and by failing to ensure a minimum daily rest period or an equivalent period of compensatory rest which directly follows the working time which that period is supposed to compensate for, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 6 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 184, 16.6.2014.
Case T-761/15: Action brought on 23 December 2015 — Sogepa v Commission
Date: 2015-12-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belgium, State aid, control of State aid, luxury products industry








C_2016068EN.01004301.xml










22.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 68/43





Action brought on 23 December 2015 — Sogepa v Commission
(Case T-761/15)
(2016/C 068/54)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Société wallonne de gestion et de participations (Sogepa) (Liège, Belgium) (represented by: A. Lepièce and H. Baeyens, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


annulment of Articles 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the European Commission decision of 31 July 2014 on non-notified State aid SA.34791 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Belgium — Rescue aid for Val Saint-Lambert SA in that it orders the recovery of an amount of aid corresponding to double the economic advantage which actually benefitted the company Val Saint-Lambert;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging the error of law which the Commission made when categorising the economic advantage in the context of the grant of the loan to Val Saint-Lambert SA and to the imposition of a double reimbursement of the economic advantage to the beneficiary.