do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, building materials, ceramics, import (EU), originating product








C_2015425EN.01002001.xml










18.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 425/20





Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2015/C 425/13)
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Ceramic tiles


The People’s Republic of China


Anti-dumping duty


Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 238, 15.9.2011, p. 1).


16.9.2016






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column
Corrigendum to Guideline (EU) 2015/1938 of the European Central Bank of 27 August 2015 amending Guideline (EU) 2015/510 of the European Central Bank on the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (ECB/2015/27) (OJ L 282, 28.10.2015)
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: European Central Bank
Subjects: Euromarket, central bank, euro area, financial market, single monetary policy




L_2015332EN.01015801.xml










18.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 332/158







Corrigendum to Guideline (EU) 2015/1938 of the European Central Bank of 27 August 2015 amending Guideline (EU) 2015/510 of the European Central Bank on the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (ECB/2015/27)

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 282 of 28 October 2015
)


On page 45, point 12, Article 107a, paragraph 4:
for:


‘4.   The DECC issuer shall be an SPV established in a Member State whose currency is the euro. Parties to the transaction, other than the issuer, the debtors of the underlying credit claims, and the originator, shall be established in the EEA.’,


read:


‘4.   The DECC issuer shall be a special purpose entity established in a Member State whose currency is the euro. Parties to the transaction, other than the issuer, the debtors of the underlying credit claims, and the originator, shall be established in the EEA.’.
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia apply
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Tunisia, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, personal data








C_2015425EN.01000601.xml










18.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 425/6





Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia apply
(2015/C 425/04)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
Case C-71/15 P: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v Kendrion NV, supported by: European Commission
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: damages, indemnification, infringement of EU law, plastics industry








C_2016078EN.01001002.xml










29.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/10





Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v Kendrion NV, supported by: European Commission
(Case C-71/15 P) (1)

(2016/C 078/12)
Language of the case: Dutch
The Vice-President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.
Case C-686/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Velikoj Gorici (Croatia) lodged on 18 December 2015 — Vodoopskrba i odvodnja d.o.o. v Željka Klafurić
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: housing, invoicing, measuring equipment, payment, water consumption, water supply








C_2016111EN.01000601.xml










29.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 111/6





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Velikoj Gorici (Croatia) lodged on 18 December 2015 — Vodoopskrba i odvodnja d.o.o. v Željka Klafurić
(Case C-686/15)
(2016/C 111/07)
Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Općinski sud u Velikoj Gorici

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Vodoopskrba i odvodnja d.o.o.

Defendant: Željka Klafurić

Question referred

How is water supplied, which is invoiced by apartment in a residential building or by individual house, calculated under EU law? Do EU citizens pay the invoices concerning their water consumption by paying only for the consumption actually shown on the meter or do they pay other fees or charges in addition?
Case C-77/15 P: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v Luigi Marcuccio
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: damages, indemnification, rights of the defence








C_2016078EN.01001003.xml










29.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/10





Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v Luigi Marcuccio
(Case C-77/15 P) (1)

(2016/C 078/13)
Language of the case: Italian
The Vice-President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
Case C-132/15 P: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v European Commission, Aalberts Industries NV
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU budget, European Commission, damages, independence of the judiciary, right to justice








C_2016078EN.01001102.xml










29.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/11





Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v European Commission, Aalberts Industries NV
(Case C-132/15 P) (1)

(2016/C 078/15)
Language of the case: Dutch
The Vice-President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.
Case C-684/15: Action brought on 18 December 2015 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aid for restructuring, approximation of laws, company in difficulties, credit institution, financial aid, financial intervention, financial solvency, investment company, national implementing measure, sanction (EU)








C_2016098EN.01002001.xml










14.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/20





Action brought on 18 December 2015 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
(Case C-684/15)
(2016/C 098/26)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Heller and K.-Ph. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that, by not adopting every law, regulation and administrative provision necessary for compliance with Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, (1) or, in any event, by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 130(1) of that directive;










—


impose on the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a penalty payment of EUR 6 700 per day from the date of delivery of the judgment in the case for failure to fulfil the obligation to communicate the transposition measures of Directive 2014/59/EU;










—


order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for the transposition of Directive 2014/59/EU expired on 31 December 2014.


(1)  OJ 2014 L 173, p. 190.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2434 of 18 December 2015 amending Implementing Decision 2014/237/EU on measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of harmful organisms as regards certain fruits and vegetables originating in India (notified under document C(2015) 9178)
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: India, health certificate, import (EU), import licence, originating product, plant disease, surveillance concerning imports, tropical fruit




L_2015334EN.01006101.xml










22.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 334/61








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2015/2434
of 18 December 2015
         
amending Implementing Decision 2014/237/EU on measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of harmful organisms as regards certain fruits and vegetables originating in India


(notified under document C(2015) 9178)




THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (1), and in particular the fourth sentence of Article 16(3) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Implementing Decision 2014/237/EU (2) prohibits the import from India of plants other than seeds and roots of Colocasia Schott, plants other than seeds of Momordica L., Solanum melongena L. and Trichosanthes L. Furthermore, for the import of plants of Mangifera L. other than seeds, Implementing Decision 2014/237/EU requires that appropriate measures are taken by Indian authorities to ensure that consignments are free from harmful organisms.












(2)


Implementing Decision 2014/237/EU is limited in time. In light of the number of interceptions of harmful organisms on a wide range of plants and plant products of Indian origin, the Commission concludes that further improvements of the Indian phytosanitary certification system are needed. Consequently, it is appropriate to extend the validity of Implementing Decision 2014/237/EU until 31 December 2016.












(3)


Implementing Decision 2014/237/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.












(4)


The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Article 2 of Implementing Decision 2014/237/EU is replaced by the following:

‘Article 2
This Decision shall expire on 31 December 2016.’



Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.




Done at Brussels, 18 December 2015.


For the Commission

Vytenis ANDRIUKAITIS
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Implementing Decision 2014/237/EU of 24 April 2014 on measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of harmful organisms as regards certain fruits and vegetables originating in India (OJ L 125, 26.4.2014, p. 93).
Case T-735/15: Action brought on 18 December 2015 — The Art Company B & S/OHMI — Manifatture Daddato et Laurora (SHOP ART)
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, leather, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016068EN.01003701.xml










22.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 68/37





Action brought on 18 December 2015 — The Art Company B & S/OHMI — Manifatture Daddato et Laurora (SHOP ART)
(Case T-735/15)
(2016/C 068/47)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: The Art Company B & S, SA (Quel, Spain) (represented by: L. Sánchez Calderón and J. Villamor Muguerza, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Manifatture Daddato SpA (Barletta, Italy), Sabina Laurora (Trani, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘SHOP ART’ — Application for registration No 12 030 921

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2015 in Case R 3050/2014-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-125/15 P: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH, Groupe Gascogne SA, supported by: European Commission
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: damages, general legal principle, independence of the judiciary, infringement of EU law, right to justice








C_2016078EN.01001101.xml










29.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/11





Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH, Groupe Gascogne SA, supported by: European Commission
(Case C-125/15 P) (1)

(2016/C 078/14)
Language of the case: French
The Vice-President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.
Case C-685/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Austria) lodged on 18 December 2015 — Online Games Handels GmbH and Others v Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Court of Human Rights, administrative offence, administrative procedure, game of chance, independence of the judiciary, public prosecution, public prosecutor's department








C_2016118EN.01000701.xml










4.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/7





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Austria) lodged on 18 December 2015 — Online Games Handels GmbH and Others v Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich
(Case C-685/15)
(2016/C 118/08)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Online Games Handels GmbH, Frank Breuer, Nicole Enter, Astrid Walden

Defendant authority: Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich

Question referred

Is Article 56 TFEU or Article 49 et seq. TFEU, in the light of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights read in conjunction with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to be interpreted, having regard to the judicial objectivity and impartiality required by the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (in particular with regard to its judgment of 18 May 2010, Application No 64962/01, paragraph 54), as precluding, in the light of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (in particular its judgment of 30 April 2014, C-390/12, (1) a national rule according to which, in the case of administrative offence proceedings, it is not for the State prosecution services (or other State prosecution bodies) in their function of representing the prosecution but rather for the court called upon to rule on the legality of the criminal measure against which an action has been brought, of its own motion and independently of the conduct of the parties to the proceedings, (in one and the same person/function) to state and delimit wholly independently the evidence justifying the criminal law protection of the quasi-monopoly regulation of the national gambling market and then autonomously to investigate and evaluate it?


(1)  ECLI:EU:C:2014:281 Pfleger and Others.
Case C-522/15 P: Order of the President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — European Commission v Siderurgica Latina Martin SpA (SLM), Ori Martin SA
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cartel, fine, market-sharing agreement, price agreement, steel, subsidiary








C_2016136EN.01002304.xml










18.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 136/23





Order of the President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — European Commission v Siderurgica Latina Martin SpA (SLM), Ori Martin SA
(Case C-522/15 P) (1)

(2016/C 136/32)
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.
Notice concerning the expiry of Council Regulation (EC) No 1340/2008 on trade in certain steel products between the European Community and the Republic of Kazakhstan
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Kazakhstan, cooperation agreement (EU), export licence, import licence, iron and steel product, originating product, quantitative restriction, trade agreement (EU)








C_2015425EN.01002101.xml










18.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 425/21





Notice concerning the expiry of Council Regulation (EC) No 1340/2008 on trade in certain steel products between the European Community and the Republic of Kazakhstan
(2015/C 425/14)
As provided for in Article 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1340/2008 of 8 December 2008 on trade in certain steel products between the European Community and the Republic of Kazakhstan (1), the European Commission gives notice that Council Regulation (EC) No 1340/2008 expired on 30 November 2015 following Kazakhstan’s accession to the World Trade Organisation on this date.


(1)  OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p. 1.
Case F-55/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Civil Service — EIB staff — Appraisal — 2011 staff report — Unlawfulness of the decision of the Adjudication Panel — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-12-18
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, damages, promotion, report, staff assessment








C_2016048EN.01009001.xml










8.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/90





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB
(Case F-55/13) (1)

((Civil Service - EIB staff - Appraisal - 2011 staff report - Unlawfulness of the decision of the Adjudication Panel - No need to adjudicate))
(2016/C 048/100)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, laywer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Nuvoli and F. Martin, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the appraisal of the applicant’s performance for 2011.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Adjudication Panel of the European Investment Bank of 18 December 2012;










2.


Declares that there is no need to rule on the pleas seeking the annulment of the staff report for 2011 and all the connected, consequent and prior acts;










3.


Dismisses the remainder of the action;










4.


Orders the European Investment Bank to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Mr De Nicola.






(1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013, p. 26.