do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-584/15 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 7 December 2015 — POA v Commission (Application for interim measures — Publication of an application for registration of a protected designation of origin — ‘Halloumi’ or ‘Hellim’ — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
Date: 2015-12-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Cyprus, agricultural product, designation of origin, foodstuff, milk, product designation, quality control of agricultural products, semi-soft cheese








C_2016048EN.01005101.xml










8.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/51





Order of the President of the General Court of 7 December 2015 — POA v Commission
(Case T-584/15 R)
((Application for interim measures - Publication of an application for registration of a protected designation of origin - ‘Halloumi’ or ‘Hellim’ - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))
(2016/C 048/58)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Pagkiprios organismos ageladotrofon Dimosia Ltd (POA) (Latsia, Cyprus) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis and J. Guillem Carrau, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the measure adopted by the Commission dated 28 July 2015 entitled ‘Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs’ (OJ 2015 C 246, p. 9).

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2275 of 7 December 2015 amending Decision 2012/389/CFSP on the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR)
Date: 2015-12-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU military mission, Horn of Africa, maritime safety, piracy




L_2015322EN.01005001.xml










8.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 322/50








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2015/2275
of 7 December 2015
         
amending Decision 2012/389/CFSP on the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28 and Articles 42(4) and 43(2) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 16 July 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/389/CFSP (1) on the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR).












(2)


On 22 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/485/CFSP (2) extending EUCAP NESTOR until 12 December 2016.












(3)


On 6 October 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1793 (3) extending the period covered by the financial reference amount until 15 December 2015.












(4)


Decision 2012/389/CFSP should be amended to provide for a financial reference amount for the period from 16 December 2015 to 12 December 2016,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Article 13(1) of Decision 2012/389/CFSP is replaced as follows:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP NESTOR for the period from 16 July 2012 to 15 November 2013 shall be EUR 22 880 000.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP NESTOR for the period from 16 November 2013 to 15 October 2014 shall be EUR 11 950 000.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP NESTOR for the period from 16 October 2014 to 15 December 2015 shall be EUR 17 900 000.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP NESTOR for the period from 16 December 2015 to 12 December 2016 shall be EUR 12 000 000.’.



Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 7 December 2015.


For the Council


The President

C. CAHEN
            





(1)  Council Decision 2012/389/CFSP of 16 July 2012 on the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR) (OJ L 187, 17.7.2012, p. 40).

(2)  Council Decision 2014/485/CFSP of 22 July 2014 amending Decision 2012/389/CFSP on the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR) (OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 39).

(3)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1793 of 6 October 2015 amending Decision 2012/389/CFSP on the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR) (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 30).
Case C-652/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Furkan Tedemir, legally represented by his parents Derya Tekdemir and Nedim Tekdemir v Kreis Bergstraße
Date: 2015-12-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU migration policy, Germany, Türkiye, migratory movement, national, residence permit








C_2016118EN.01000202.xml










4.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/2





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Furkan Tedemir, legally represented by his parents Derya Tekdemir and Nedim Tekdemir v Kreis Bergstraße
(Case C-652/15)
(2016/C 118/03)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Furkan Tedemir, legally represented by his parents Derya Tekdemir and Nedim Tekdemir

Defendant: Kreis Bergstraße

Questions referred







1.


Does the aim of efficient management of migration flows constitute an overriding reason in the public interest capable of denying exemption for a Turkish national born in federal territory from the requirement for a residence permit which he could claim by virtue of the standstill clause of Article 13 of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC/Turkey Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the Development of the Association?










2.


If the Court of Justice of the European Union answers the above question in the affirmative: What are the qualitative requirements for the existence of an ‘overriding reason in the public interest’ in relation to the aim of efficient management of migration flows?
Case T-482/15: Order of the General Court of 7 December 2015 — Ahrend Furniture v Commission
Date: 2015-12-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, award of contract, furniture industry, supplies contract, technology assessment








C_2016059EN.01005101.xml










15.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 59/51





Order of the General Court of 7 December 2015 — Ahrend Furniture v Commission
(Case T-482/15) (1)

(2016/C 059/59)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
Case C-654/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Länsförsäkringar AB v A/S Matek
Date: 2015-12-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016048EN.01002601.xml










8.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/26





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Länsförsäkringar AB v A/S Matek
(Case C-654/15)
(2016/C 048/31)
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta domstolen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Länsförsäkringar AB

Defendant: A/S Matek

Questions referred

The questions concern the interpretation and application of Article 9(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark where third parties use, without consent, in the course of trade, a sign similar to a Community trade mark (1).
The questions are:






1.


Does it affect the proprietor’s exclusive right that, within a period of five years following registration, he has not made genuine use of the Community trade mark in the European Union for goods or services covered by the registration?










2.


If the answer to question 1 is in the affirmative, in what circumstances and in what way does that situation affect the exclusive right?






(1)  OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1.
Case C-653/15 P: Appeal brought on 7 December 2015 by Mr Carsten Bopp against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 September 2015 in Case T-209/14 Carsten Bopp v European Union Intellectual Property Office
Date: 2015-12-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, business administration, business management, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016191EN.01000303.xml










30.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/3





Appeal brought on 7 December 2015 by Mr Carsten Bopp against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 September 2015 in Case T-209/14 Carsten Bopp v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-653/15 P)
(2016/C 191/06)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Carsten Bopp (represented by: C. Russ, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 7 April 2016, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and decided that the appellant must bear his own costs.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2276 of 7 December 2015 amending and extending Decision 2013/233/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya)
Date: 2015-12-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU police mission, Libya, border control, cross-border cooperation, international security




L_2015322EN.01005101.xml










8.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 322/51








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2015/2276
of 7 December 2015
         
amending and extending Decision 2013/233/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 22 May 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/233/CFSP (1) establishing the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya).












(2)


On 21 May 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/800 (2) amending and extending Decision 2013/233/CFSP, in particular by extending EUBAM Libya until 21 November 2015 and providing for a financial reference amount for the same period.












(3)


EUBAM Libya should be extended for a further period of three months, until 21 February 2016.












(4)


Decision 2013/233/CFSP should be amended accordingly.












(5)


EUBAM Libya will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Council Decision 2013/233/CFSP is amended as follows:






(1)


In Article 13, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUBAM Libya for the period from 22 May 2013 to 21 May 2014 shall be EUR 30 300 000.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUBAM Libya for the period from 22 May 2014 to 21 February 2016 shall be EUR 26 200 000.’.











(2)


In Article 16, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:
‘It shall apply until 21 February 2016.’.






Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall apply from 22 November 2015.




Done at Brussels, 7 December 2015.


For the Council


The President

C. CAHEN
            





(1)  Council Decision 2013/233/CFSP of 22 May 2013 on the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya) (OJ L 138, 24.5.2013, p. 15).

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/800 of 21 May 2015 amending and extending Decision 2013/233/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya) (OJ L 127, 22.5.2015, p. 22).
Case F-136/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 7 December 2015 — Probst v Commission (Civil service — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Former parliamentary assistant — Commission’s decision to grant the expatriation allowance to former parliamentary assistants as of the date of publication of the information given to staff — Judgments annulling a measure — Substantial new facts — Limited temporal effect — Res judicata — Administrative decisions which have become final — Equal treatment)
Date: 2015-12-07
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, expatriate worker, indemnification, regulations for civil servants, retroactivity of a law








C_2016048EN.01010001.xml










8.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/100





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 7 December 2015 — Probst v Commission
(Case F-136/14) (1)

((Civil service - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Former parliamentary assistant - Commission’s decision to grant the expatriation allowance to former parliamentary assistants as of the date of publication of the information given to staff - Judgments annulling a measure - Substantial new facts - Limited temporal effect - Res judicata - Administrative decisions which have become final - Equal treatment))
(2016/C 048/115)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Norbert Probst (Genval, Belgium) (represented by: D. de Abreu Caldas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially J. Currall and T.S. Bohr, Agents, and subsequently T.S. Bohr, Agent)

Re:

Application by the applicant for annulment of the Commission’s decision granting him, with retrospective effect, the expatriation allowance, in so far as the retrospective effect extends merely to 1 September 2013, and the applicant claims that the Commission should grant him that allowance as of his recruitment by the Commission on 1 July 1999.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.










2.


Mr Probst shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 34, 2.2.2015, p. 54.
Case C-656/15 P: Appeal brought on 7 December 2015 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2015 in Case T-674/11 TV2/Danmark A/S v European Commission
Date: 2015-12-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Denmark, State aid, advertising, control of State aid, interpretation of the law, public sector, services of general interest, television








C_2016048EN.01002701.xml










8.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/27





Appeal brought on 7 December 2015 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2015 in Case T-674/11 TV2/Danmark A/S v European Commission
(Case C-656/15 P)
(2016/C 048/32)
Language of the case: Danish

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: ved B. Stromsky, T. Maxian Rusche and L. Grønfeldt, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: TV2/Danmark A/S, Kingdom of Denmark, Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd

Form of order sought

Set aside the judgment of the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2015 in Case T-674/11 TV2/Danmark A/S v European Commission, in so far as it annuls Commission Decision 2011/839/EU of 20 April 2011 concerning Danish measures (C 2/03) in favour of TV2/Danmark (1) in so far as that decision finds that advertising revenue from 1995 and 1996 constitutes State aid.
Dismiss the third alternative claim of the applicant at first instance on its merits.
Order the applicant at first instance to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that the General Court erred by misinterpreting the concept of ‘State resources’ in Article 107(1) TFEU, including the concept of ‘control’, and in failing to provide a proper statement of reasons.
The essential points of the appellant’s arguments put forward in support of its appeal are as follows:






—


The General Court erred in paragraphs 210 and 211 by failing to recognise that TV2 Reklame’s resources are State resources because TV2 Reklame is a State-owned company; the General Court applied an overly narrow interpretation of the case-law concerning the concept of State resources from State-owned businesses.










—


The General Court erred in law by applying an overly narrow interpretation of the concept of ‘control’ in its assessment of the State’s control over TV2 Reklame’s resources. Similarly, it erred in paragraph 215 by also interpreting too narrowly the concept of ‘control’ in its assessment of the State’s control of the resources in the TV2 Fund.










—


The General Court erred in law by misinterpreting the judgment in PreussenElektra, C-379/98, ECLI:EU:C:2001:160. That misinterpretation plays a central role in the general Court’s reasons for annulling the contested decision.






(1)  OJ 2011 L 340, p. 1.
Case C-658/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Robeco Hollands Bezit NV and Others v Stichting Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM)
Date: 2015-12-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: broker, investment company, official market, purchase, sale, sales representative, share








C_2016098EN.01001901.xml










14.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/19





Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Robeco Hollands Bezit NV and Others v Stichting Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM)
(Case C-658/15)
(2016/C 098/24)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: Robeco Hollands Bezit NV, Robeco Duurzaam Aandelen NV, Robeco Safe Mix NV, Robeco Solid Mix NV, Robeco Balanced Mix NV, Robeco Growth Mix NV, Robeco Life Cycle Funds NV, Robeco Afrika Fonds NV, Robeco Global Stars Equities, Robeco All Strategy Euro Bonds, Robeco High Yield Bonds, Robeco Property Equities

Respondent: Stichting Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM)

Question referred

Must a system in which multiple fund agents and brokers participate who, within that system, represent respectively ‘open end’ investment funds and investors in commercial transactions, and which, in fact, facilitates exclusively those ‘open end’ investment funds in their obligation to execute the purchase and selling orders for shares placed by investors, be regarded as a regulated market within the meaning of Article 4(1).14 of the MiFID (1) and, if so, what characteristics are determinant in that regard?


(1)  Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments, amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC (OJ 2004 L 145, p. 1).
Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
Date: 2015-12-07
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union








C_2015406EN.01000101.xml










7.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 406/1







Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 406/01)


Last publication


OJ C 398, 30.11.2015


Past publications


OJ C 389, 23.11.2015


OJ C 381, 16.11.2015


OJ C 371, 9.11.2015


OJ C 363, 3.11.2015


OJ C 354, 26.10.2015


OJ C 346, 19.10.2015

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu