do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
P8_TA(2015)0396 Repealing certain acts from the Schengen acquis ***I European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2015 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing certain acts in the Area of Freedom Security and Justice (COM(2014)0713 — C8-0277/2014 — 2014/0337(COD)) P8_TC1-COD(2014)0337 Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 24 November 2015 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2016/… of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing certain acts from the Schengen acquis
Date: 2015-11-24
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Community acquis, EU visa policy, Frontex, Schengen Information System, border control, cross-border cooperation, external border of the EU, foreign national, illegal migration, passport








C_2017366EN.01016101.xml










27.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 366/161





P8_TA(2015)0396
Repealing certain acts from the Schengen acquis ***I
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2015 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing certain acts in the Area of Freedom Security and Justice (COM(2014)0713 — C8-0277/2014 — 2014/0337(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
(2017/C 366/19)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2014)0713),










—


having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 77(2)(a),(b) and (d), Article 78(2)(e) and (g), Article 79(2)(c) and (d) and Article 87(2)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8-0277/2014),










—


having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 21 October 2015 to approve Parliament’s position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to Rules 59 and 50(2) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0250/2015),












1.


Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;












2.


Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;












3.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.






P8_TC1-COD(2014)0337
Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 24 November 2015 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2016/… of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing certain acts from the Schengen acquis

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EU) 2016/93.)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2196 of 24 November 2015 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Torta del Casar (PDO))
Date: 2015-11-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Extremadura, Spain, designation of origin, foodstuff, labelling, product designation, sheep's milk cheese








L_2015313EN.01002901.xml










28.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 313/29








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/2196
of 24 November 2015
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Torta del Casar (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Spain's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Torta del Casar’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1491/2003 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Torta del Casar’ (PDO) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 November 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1491/2003 of 25 August 2003 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 (Ficodindia dell'Etna, Monte Etna, Colline di Romagna, Pretuziano delle Colline Teramane, Torta del Casar, Manzana de Girona or Poma de Girona) (OJ L 214, 26.8.2003, p. 6).

(3)  
            OJ C 235, 18.7.2015, p. 5.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7789 — The Carlyle Group/PA Consulting) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-11-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control








C_2015390EN.01000201.xml










24.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 390/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7789 — The Carlyle Group/PA Consulting)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 390/03)
On 18 November 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7789. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7748 — Magna/Getrag) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-11-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry, vehicle parts








C_2015390EN.01002401.xml










24.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 390/24





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7748 — Magna/Getrag)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 390/07)






1.


On 12 November 2015, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Magna International Inc. (‘Magna’, Canada) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking GETRAG Getriebe- und Zahnradfabrik Hermann Hagenmeyer GmbH & Cie KG (‘GETRAG’, Germany) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Magna: the manufacture and supply, at a global level, of a wide range of automotive components that relate to various parts of the vehicle, including the body, chassis, exterior, seating, powertrain, electronics, vision, and closure and roof systems,
—   for GETRAG: the manufacture and supply, at a global level, of transmission systems for passenger cars, light commercial vehicles and motorcycles and the provision of related after sales services.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7748 — Magna/Getrag, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2267 of 24 November 2015 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pampapato di Ferrara/Pampepato di Ferrara (PGI))
Date: 2015-11-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Emilia-Romagna, Italy, bread, confectionery product, designation of origin, foodstuff, labelling, product designation








L_2015322EN.01001301.xml










8.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 322/13








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/2267
of 24 November 2015
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pampapato di Ferrara/Pampepato di Ferrara (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Pampapato di Ferrara’/‘Pampepato di Ferrara’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pampapato di Ferrara’/‘Pampepato di Ferrara’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Pampapato di Ferrara’/‘Pampepato di Ferrara’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name referred to in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 2.3 Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker's wares, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 November 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 238, 21.7.2015, p. 9.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case T-670/13 P: Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2015 — Commission v D’Agostino (Appeal — Cross-appeal — Civil service — Member of the contract staff — Decision not to renew the contract — Duty of care — Infringement of Article 12a(2) of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the file)
Date: 2015-11-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: servant (EU), staff regulations (EU), termination of employment, work contract








C_2016016EN.01002801.xml










18.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/28





Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2015 — Commission v D’Agostino
(Case T-670/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Cross-appeal - Civil service - Member of the contract staff - Decision not to renew the contract - Duty of care - Infringement of Article 12a(2) of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons - Distortion of the file))
(2016/C 016/34)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, and subsequently by G. Gattinara, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Luigi D’Agostino (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 23 October 2013 in Case F-93/12 D’Agostino v Commission (F-93/12, ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:155), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 23 October 2013 in D’Agostino v Commission (F-93/12) in so far the Civil Service Tribunal incorrectly applied the duty of care;










2.


Dismisses the remainder of the main appeal;










3.


Sets aside the judgment in D’Agostino v Commission in so far as the Civil Service Tribunal failed to adjudicate on the first part of the second ground of appeal and distorted it;










4.


Dismisses the cross-appeal for the remainder;










5.


Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;










6.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  OJ C 78, 15.3.2014.