do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-613/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 5 de Alcobendas (Spain) lodged on 20 November 2015 — Ibercaja Banco S.A.U. v José Cortés González
Date: 2015-11-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: interest, loan, mortgage, national law, unfair terms of contract








C_2016048EN.01001701.xml










8.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 5 de Alcobendas (Spain) lodged on 20 November 2015 — Ibercaja Banco S.A.U. v José Cortés González
(Case C-613/15)
(2016/C 048/23)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 5 de Alcobendas

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ibercaja Banco S.A.U.

Defendant: José Cortés González

Questions referred







1.


Do Articles 3(1), 4(1), 6(1) and 7(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 (1) preclude a provision of national law, such as Article 114 of the Law on Mortgages, under which the national court, when assessing the unfairness of a term fixing default interest, may examine only whether the agreed interest rate exceeds three times the statutory interest rate and may take account of no other circumstances?










2.


Do Articles 3(1), 4(1), 6(1) and 7(1) of Directive 93/13 preclude a provision of national law, such as Article 693 LEC, which allows a claim to be made for accelerated repayment of the total amount of the loan on the grounds of failure to pay three monthly instalments, without account being taken of other factors such as the duration or amount of the loan or any other relevant matters, and which also makes the possibility of avoiding the effects of such accelerated repayment dependent on the will of the creditor except in cases in which the mortgage is secured on the mortgagor’s permanent residence?










3.


Is the Fourth Transitional Provision of Law 1/1203 contrary to the line of decided cases following Cofidis? (2)







(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).

(2)  Case C-473/00 EU:C:2002:705.
Case T-680/15: Action brought on 20 November 2015 — Les Éclaires v OHIM — L’éclaireur International (L’ECLAIREUR)
Date: 2015-11-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, cosmetic product, fancy leather goods and glove-making industry, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016038EN.01006601.xml










1.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/66





Action brought on 20 November 2015 — Les Éclaires v OHIM — L’éclaireur International (L’ECLAIREUR)
(Case T-680/15)
(2016/C 038/89)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Les Éclaires GmbH (Nürnberg, Germany) (represented by: S. Bund, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: L’éclaireur International (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘L’ECLAIREUR’ — Community trade mark No 3 494 028

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2015 in Case R 2266/2014-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 15(1) Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Discordance with the Guidelines for Examination of the OHIM Part C Section 6.