do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2015-11-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Thailand, anti-dumping duty, book trade, import (EU), originating product








C_2015384EN.01000701.xml










18.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 384/7





Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2015/C 384/06)
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.
Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Certain ring binder mechanisms


Thailand


Anti-dumping duty


Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 792/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain ring binder mechanisms originating Thailand (OJ L 204, 9.8.2011, p. 11)


10.8.2016






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7797 — Michelin/Fives/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-11-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, mechanical engineering, merger control, rubber industry








C_2015384EN.01000801.xml










18.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 384/8





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7797 — Michelin/Fives/JV)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 384/07)






1.


On 12 November 2015, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin (‘Michelin’), through its wholly owned subsidiary Spika SAS (France) and Fives SA (‘Fives’, France) acquire(s) within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Fives Michelin Additive Solutions SAS (France) by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Michelin: manufacture and distribution of tires for automotive and other industries,
—   for Fives: design and manufacture of industrial machines, process equipment and production lines,
—   for Fives Michelin Additive Solutions SAS: development, manufacture, and sale of additive manufacturing machines and parts, as well as provision of related services.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7797 — Michelin/Fives/JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case F-26/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 18 November 2015 — FH v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Installation allowance — Article 5(2) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Transfer to a new place of employment — Last sentence of Article 5(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Non-payment of the installation allowance if an official entitled to the household allowance is transferred to the place where his family resides — Need for the official to be installed with his family in the place of employment — Spouses effectively separated — Consequences — Inapplicability of the last sentence of Article 5(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations)
Date: 2015-11-18
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, allowances and expenses, change of job, interest, occupational migration, separated person, staff regulations (EU)








C_2016007EN.01003501.xml










11.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/35





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 18 November 2015 — FH v Parliament
(Case F-26/15) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Installation allowance - Article 5(2) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to a new place of employment - Last sentence of Article 5(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Non-payment of the installation allowance if an official entitled to the household allowance is transferred to the place where his family resides - Need for the official to be installed with his family in the place of employment - Spouses effectively separated - Consequences - Inapplicability of the last sentence of Article 5(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations))
(2016/C 007/46)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: FH (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and N. Chemaï, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to reject the applicant’s application to be paid the installation allowance, following his relocation from Yemen to Brussels, where his spouse, from whom he is separated, lives, and an application seeking that the defendant be ordered to pay the applicant that installation allowance together with interest.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decision of 15 April 2014 by which the European Parliament rejected the application for the installation allowance submitted by FH;










2.


Orders the European Parliament to pay FH, in respect of the installation allowance due to him, a sum corresponding to one month of his basic salary; that sum is to be paid together with default interest calculated at the rate set by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations and applicable during the period concerned, increased by two points, from 11 February 2014 until the date of actual payment;










3.


Declares that the European Parliament is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by FH.






(1)  OJ C 127, 20/4/2015, p. 44.