do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2111 of 12 November 2015 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Echalote d'Anjou (PGI))
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, Loire Region, bulb vegetable, designation of origin, fresh product, labelling, product designation








L_2015306EN.01000301.xml










24.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 306/3








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/2111
of 12 November 2015
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Echalote d'Anjou (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Echalote d'Anjou’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Echalote d'Anjou’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Echalote d'Anjou’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. — Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 November 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 218, 3.7.2015, p. 6.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case T-253/13: Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2015 — Orthogen v OHIM — Arthrex (IRAP) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark IRAP — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, veterinary drug, veterinary medicine








C_2016007EN.01001801.xml










11.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/18





Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2015 — Orthogen v OHIM — Arthrex (IRAP)
(Case T-253/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark IRAP - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2016/C 007/24)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Orthogen AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Finger and S. Krüger, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by D. Walicka and A. Schifko, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Arthrex GmbH (Garching, Germany) (represented by: R. Greiffenberg and O. Stöckel, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 February 2013 (Case R 382/2012-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Arthrex GmbH and Orthogen AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Orthogen AG to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and by Arthrex GmbH.






(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Case T-634/15: Action brought on 12 November 2015 — Frinsa del Noroeste v OHIM — Frigoríficos Unidos (Frinsa LA CONSERVA)
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, fishery product, foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016016EN.01004801.xml










18.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/48





Action brought on 12 November 2015 — Frinsa del Noroeste v OHIM — Frigoríficos Unidos (Frinsa LA CONSERVA)
(Case T-634/15)
(2016/C 016/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Frinsa del Noroeste, SA (Santa Eugenia de Ribeira, Spain) (represented by: J. Botella Reyna, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Frigoríficos Unidos, SA (Riudellots de la Selva, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘FRINSA LA CONSERVA’ — Application for registration No 11 495 728

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 July 2015 in Case R 2382/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision.





Pleas in law







—


Priority rights in respect of the term FRINSA and peaceful coexistence on the market and in the registration of the allegedly conflicting marks.










—


Well-known character of the mark FRINSA.










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7752 — ACE/Chubb) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, merger control, pension scheme, reinsurance








C_2015375EN.01000101.xml










12.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 375/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7752 — ACE/Chubb)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 375/01)
On 6 November 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7752. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-499/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2015 — HSH Investment Holdings Coinvest-C and HSH Investment Holdings FSO v Commission (State aid — Banking sector — Restructuring of HSH Nordbank — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market on certain conditions — Action for annulment — Lack of individual concern — Minority shareholder of the aid beneficiary — Concept of distinctive interest — Partial inadmissibility — capital dilution)
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, aid for restructuring, bank, control of State aid, shareholder








C_2016007EN.01001601.xml










11.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/16





Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2015 — HSH Investment Holdings Coinvest-C and HSH Investment Holdings FSO v Commission
(Case T-499/12) (1)

((State aid - Banking sector - Restructuring of HSH Nordbank - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market on certain conditions - Action for annulment - Lack of individual concern - Minority shareholder of the aid beneficiary - Concept of distinctive interest - Partial inadmissibility - capital dilution))
(2016/C 007/22)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: HSH Investment Holdings Coinvest-C Sàrl (Luxembourg); and HSH Investment Holdings FSO Sàrl (Luxembourg) (represented by: H.-J. Niemeyer, H. Ehlers and C. Kovács, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2012/477/EU of 20 September 2011 on State aid granted by Germany to HSH Nordbank AG SA.29338 (C 29/09 (ex N 264/09)) (OJ 2012 L 225, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders HSH Investment Holdings Coinvest-C Sàrl and HSH Investment Holdings FSO Sàrl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
Case F-41/15 DISS I: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 November 2015 — FL, FM and FO v CEPOL
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, damages, indemnification, rights of civil servants, termination of employment








C_2015429EN.01003001.xml










21.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 429/30





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 November 2015 — FL, FM and FO v CEPOL
(Case F-41/15 DISS I)
(2015/C 429/40)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.
Case T-449/13: Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2015 — CEDC International v OHIM — Fabryka Wódek Polmos Łańcut (WISENT) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark WISENT — Earlier national three-dimensional mark ŹUBRÓWKA — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the marks — Articles 53(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, spirits, trade-mark law








C_2016007EN.01002001.xml










11.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/20





Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2015 — CEDC International v OHIM — Fabryka Wódek Polmos Łańcut (WISENT)
(Case T-449/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark WISENT - Earlier national three-dimensional mark ŹUBRÓWKA - Relative grounds for refusal - Similarity of the marks - Articles 53(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 007/27)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: CEDC International sp. z o.o. (Oborniki Wielkopolskie, Poland) (represented by: M. Siciarek, J. Mrozowski and G. Rząsa, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Fabryka Wódek Polmos Łańcut SA (Łańcut, Poland) (represented by: A. Gorzkiewicz, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 June 2013 (Case R 33/2012-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Przedsiębiorstwo Polmos Białystok and Fabryka Wodek Polmos Łańcut SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 10 June 2013 (Case R 33/2012-4);










2.


Orders OHIM and Fabryka Wódek Polmos Łańcut SA to bear their own costs and to pay those of CEDC International sp. z o.o.






(1)  OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.
Case C-439/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 November 2015 — Elitaliana SpA v Eulex Kosovo (Appeal — Public service contracts — Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP — Call for tenders for helicopter support for the Eulex Mission in Kosovo — Action brought against the decision awarding the contract — Article 24(1), second subparagraph, TEU — Article 275, first subparagraph, TFEU — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 263, first paragraph, TFEU — Meaning of ‘bodies, offices or agencies of the Union’ — Measures attributable to the European Commission — Excusable error)
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU military mission, Kosovo, award of contract, helicopter, invitation to tender, services contract








C_2016016EN.01000201.xml










18.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/2





Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 November 2015 — Elitaliana SpA v Eulex Kosovo
(Case C-439/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Public service contracts - Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP - Call for tenders for helicopter support for the Eulex Mission in Kosovo - Action brought against the decision awarding the contract - Article 24(1), second subparagraph, TEU - Article 275, first subparagraph, TFEU - Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) - Jurisdiction of the Court - Article 263, first paragraph, TFEU - Meaning of ‘bodies, offices or agencies of the Union’ - Measures attributable to the European Commission - Excusable error))
(2016/C 016/02)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Elitaliana SpA (represented by: R. Colagrande, avvocato)

Other party to the proceedings: Eulex Kosovo (represented by: G. Brosadola Pontotti, Solicitor)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Elitaliana SpA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2110 of 12 November 2015 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Mojama de Barbate (PGI)]
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Andalusia, Spain, designation of origin, dried product, fish product, labelling, product designation, sea fish








L_2015306EN.01000101.xml










24.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 306/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/2110
of 12 November 2015
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Mojama de Barbate (PGI)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Mojama de Barbate’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Mojama de Barbate’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Mojama de Barbate’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.7. — Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 November 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 223, 8.7.2015, p. 10.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case T-255/13: Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2015 — Italy v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Flat rate financial corrections — Direct payments — Conditionality — Aid for the processing of citrus fruit — Conditions for accreditation of a paying agency)
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, EAGGF Guarantee Section, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, citrus fruit, eligibility criteria, food processing, principle of legal certainty








C_2016007EN.01001802.xml










11.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/18





Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2015 — Italy v Commission
(Case T-255/13) (1)

((EAGGF - Guarantee Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Flat rate financial corrections - Direct payments - Conditionality - Aid for the processing of citrus fruit - Conditions for accreditation of a paying agency))
(2016/C 007/25)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Italy (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, and by B. Tidore and M. Salvatorelli, avvocati dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and P. Rossi, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2013/123/EU of 26 February 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2013 L 67, p. 20), in so far as it contains flat rate financial corrections concerning expenditure incurred by the Republic of Italy.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Republic of Italy to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.
Case T-638/15: Action brought on 12 November 2015 — Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) v OHIM — Lion Laboratories (ALCOLOCK)
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, safety device, trade-mark law








C_2016016EN.01005001.xml










18.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/50





Action brought on 12 November 2015 — Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) v OHIM — Lion Laboratories (ALCOLOCK)
(Case T-638/15)
(2016/C 016/60)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) Inc. (Toronto, Canada) (represented by: E. Baud, P. Marchiset, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lion Laboratories Ltd (Barry, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ALCOLOCK’ — Community trade mark No 8 443 301

Procedure before OHIM: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 August 2015 in Case R 1323/2014-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


declare valid the CTM Trademark owned and registered in the name of Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International), Inc.;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Articles 8(2) and 15(2) of Regulation No 207/2009, Article 10(2) of Directive No 2008/95 and Article 19(2) of TRIPS, lack of motivation and misrepresentation of the facts;










—


Infringement of Articles 57(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and insufficient motivation;










—


Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 296 TFEU and violation of the definition of genuine use pursuant to Regulation No. 207/2009.
Case T-633/15: Action brought on 12 November 2015 — JT International v OHIM — Habanos (PUSH)
Date: 2015-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, tobacco, trade-mark law








C_2016027EN.01007001.xml










25.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 27/70





Action brought on 12 November 2015 — JT International v OHIM — Habanos (PUSH)
(Case T-633/15)
(2016/C 027/88)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: JT International SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, K. Gilbert and M. Gilbert, Solicitors)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Corporación Habanos, SA (La Habana, Cuba)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘PUSH’ — Application for registration No 11 639 903

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 August 2015 in Case R 3046/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.