do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-628/15: Action brought on 11 November 2015 — Frame v OHIM — Bianca-Moden (BiancalunA)
Date: 2015-11-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, cosmetic product, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016007EN.01003302.xml










11.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/33





Action brought on 11 November 2015 — Frame v OHIM — Bianca-Moden (BiancalunA)
(Case T-628/15)
(2016/C 007/45)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Frame Srl (San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy) (represented by: M. Borghese, R. Giordano, E. Montelione, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bianca-Moden GmbH & Co. KG (Ochtrup, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘BiancalunA’ — Application for registration No 11 246 204

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 August 2015 in Case R 2720/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision; and/or










—


remit the case to OHIM so that the likelihood of confusion is properly analyzed taking into account the results of the proof of use filed by Bianca-Moden GmbH & Co. KG;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs both at the first instance and on the present proceedings;










—


in the alternative, reform the contested decision so that the following goods in class 25 would be registered: underwear, pyjama’s, t-shirts, panties, undues.





Pleas in law







—


Erroneous interpretation of Regulation No 207/2009 in selecting just one earlier right;










—


Erroneous interpretation of Regulation No 207/2009 in evaluating the likelihood of confusion amongst the signs in comparison.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7737 — Honeywell/Elster) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-11-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronic component, industrial manufacturing, measuring equipment, merger control








C_2015374EN.01000401.xml










11.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 374/4





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7737 — Honeywell/Elster)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 374/05)






1.


On 4 November 2015, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Honeywell International Inc. of the USA (‘Honeywell’) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the Elster Division (‘Elster’) of Melrose Industries PLC of the United Kingdom by way of purchase of shares. The same concentration was already notified to the European Commission on 9 October 2015, but subsequently withdrawn on 3 November 2015.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


Honeywell is a diversified technology and manufacturing company that is active worldwide in three business segments: (i) Aerospace; (ii) Automation and Control Solutions; and (iii) Performance Materials and Technologies. Amongst others it manufactures and distributes integrated systems and components such as valves, burners and meters for heating applications and the measurement and regulation of gas flows.










—


Elster is a global supplier of integrated systems and components such as valves, burners and meters for heating applications and the measurement and regulation of gas flows. Elster also manufactures and supplies electricity and water metering products.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7737 — Honeywell/Elster, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case T-544/13: Judgment of the General Court of 11 November 2015 — Dyson v Commission (Directive 2010/30/EU — Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 — Competence of the Commission — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2015-11-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: eco-label, energy consumption, equal treatment, household electrical appliance, labelling, marketing standard








C_2016007EN.01002201.xml










11.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 7/22





Judgment of the General Court of 11 November 2015 — Dyson v Commission
(Case T-544/13) (1)

((Directive 2010/30/EU - Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 - Competence of the Commission - Equal treatment - Obligation to state reasons))
(2016/C 007/30)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Dyson Ltd (Malmesbury, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Carlin, Barrister, E. Batchelor and M. Healy, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. White and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 of 3 May 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of vacuum cleaners (OJ 2013 L 192, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Dyson Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7631 — Royal Dutch Shell/BG Group) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-11-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy industry, merger control, natural gas, petrochemicals, pipeline transport








C_2015374EN.01000101.xml










11.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 374/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7631 — Royal Dutch Shell/BG Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 374/01)
On 2 September 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7631. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7523 — CMA CGM/OPDR) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-11-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: carrier, economic concentration, logistics, maritime shipping, merger control, port administration








C_2015374EN.01000102.xml










11.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 374/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7523 — CMA CGM/OPDR)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 374/02)
On 29 June 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7523. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case F-81/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 November 2015 — GM and GN v Commission
Date: 2015-11-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: administrator, pay scale, promotion, staff regulations (EU)








C_2015429EN.01003004.xml










21.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 429/30





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 November 2015 — GM and GN v Commission
(Case F-81/15) (1)

(2015/C 429/43)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 262, 10/8/2015, p. 42.