do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-79/13: Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Accorinti and Others v ECB (Non-contractual liability — Economic and monetary policy — ECB — National central banks — Restructuring of Greek public debt — Programme for purchasing securities — Securities exchange agreement for the sole benefit of central banks in the Eurosystem — Private sector involvement — Collective action clauses — Credit enhancement in the form of a buyback programme intended to support the quality of the securities as collateral — Private creditors — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Liability for a lawful legislative measure — Unusual and special damage)
Date: 2015-10-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Greece, aid for restructuring, central bank, damage, indemnification, public debt, securities








C_2015398EN.01003301.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/33





Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Accorinti and Others v ECB
(Case T-79/13) (1)

((Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - ECB - National central banks - Restructuring of Greek public debt - Programme for purchasing securities - Securities exchange agreement for the sole benefit of central banks in the Eurosystem - Private sector involvement - Collective action clauses - Credit enhancement in the form of a buyback programme intended to support the quality of the securities as collateral - Private creditors - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Legitimate expectations - Equal treatment - Liability for a lawful legislative measure - Unusual and special damage))
(2015/C 398/42)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Alessandro Accorinti (Nichelino, Italy) and 214 other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex to the judgment (represented by: S. Sutti, R. Spelta and G. Sanna, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: initially S. Bening and P. Papapaschalis, then P. Senkovic and P. Papapaschalis, and finally P. Senkovic, acting as Agents, and by E. Castellani, B. Kaiser and T. Lübbig, lawyers)

Re:

Action for damages for the harm suffered by the applicants as a result of, in particular, the adoption by the ECB of Decision 2012/153/EU of 5 March 2012 on the eligibility of marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic in the context of the Hellenic Republic’s debt exchange offer (OJ 2012 L 77, p. 19) and of other decisions of the European Central Bank taken in the context of the restructuring of Greek debt.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders Mr Alessandro Accorinti and the other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.
Case T-658/14: Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Jurašinović v Council (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents exchange with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former-Yugoslavia in the course of legal proceedings — Decision taken following the partial annulment by the Tribunal of the initial decision — Partial refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of international relations)
Date: 2015-10-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: International Criminal Tribunal, access to EU information, judicial proceedings, provision of documents








C_2015398EN.01005501.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/55





Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Jurašinović v Council
(Case T-658/14) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents exchange with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former-Yugoslavia in the course of legal proceedings - Decision taken following the partial annulment by the Tribunal of the initial decision - Partial refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of international relations))
(2015/C 398/69)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Ivan Jurašinović (Angers, France) (represented by: O. Pfligersdorffer and S. Durieu, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Rebasti and A. Jensen, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Council decision of 8 July 2014 refusing to grant the applicant full access to certain documents exchanged with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the case against A. Gotovina, taken following the partial annulment of the initial decision by judgment of 3 October 2012 in Jurašinović v Council (T-63/10, Rec, EU:T:2012:516).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the action in so far as the form of order seeking annulment of the decision of the Council of the European Union of 8 July 2014 refusing to grant Mr Ivan Jurašinović full access to certain documents exchanged with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the proceedings against Mr A. Gotovina, taken following the partial annulment of the initial decision by judgment of 3 October 2012 in Jurašinović v Council (T-63/10, Rec, EU:T:2012:516)concern Documents No 7, 25, 33, 34 and 36.










2.


Dismisses the remainder of the action.










3.


Orders Mr Jurašinović to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council.






(1)  OJ C 380, 27.10.2014.
Case T-228/14: Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — CBM v OHIM — Aeronautica Militare (TRECOLORE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark TRECOLORE — Earlier Community and national word and figurative marks FRECCE TRICOLORI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-10-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, leather, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015398EN.01004801.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/48





Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — CBM v OHIM — Aeronautica Militare (TRECOLORE)
(Case T-228/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark TRECOLORE - Earlier Community and national word and figurative marks FRECCE TRICOLORI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 398/60)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Lüken, M. Grundmann and N. Kerger, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Aeronautica Militare — Stato Maggiore (Rome, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 January 2014 (Case R 594/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Aeronautica Militare — Stato Maggiore and CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.
Joined Cases T-292/14 and T-293/14: Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Cyprus v OHIM (XAΛΛOYMI and HALLOUMI) (Community trade mark — Applications for Community word marks XAΛΛOYMI and HALLOUMI — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-10-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cheese, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015398EN.01005201.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/52





Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Cyprus v OHIM (XAΛΛOYMI and HALLOUMI)
(Joined Cases T-292/14 and T-293/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Applications for Community word marks XAΛΛOYMI and HALLOUMI - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 398/65)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Re:

Two actions brought against two decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 February 2014 (Case R 1849/2013-4 and Case R 1503/2013-4), concerning applications for registration of the word sign XAΛΛOYMI and the word sign HALLOUMI, respectively, as Community trade marks.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Republic of Cyprus to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).






(1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7756 — Providence Equity/Chime) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-10-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: advertising, communications industry, economic concentration, financial institution, merger control, sport








C_2015330EN.01000102.xml










7.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 330/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7756 — Providence Equity/Chime)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 330/02)
On 25 September 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7756. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-528/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 7 October 2015 — Policie ČR v Salah Al Chodor and Others
Date: 2015-10-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: foreign national, imprisonment, right of asylum, right to justice








C_2016016EN.01001602.xml










18.1.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/16





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 7 October 2015 — Policie ČR v Salah Al Chodor and Others
(Case C-528/15)
(2016/C 016/20)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Policie České republiky, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie

Other parties: Salah Al Chodor, Ajlin Al Chodor, Ajvar Al Chodor

Question referred

Does the sole fact that a law has not defined objective criteria for assessment of a significant risk that a foreign national may abscond (Article 2(n) of Regulation No 604/2013 (1)) render detention under Article 28(2) of that regulation inapplicable?


(1)  OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7716 — Pfizer/GSK Menacwy Business) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-10-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, pharmaceutical industry








C_2015330EN.01000101.xml










7.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 330/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7716 — Pfizer/GSK Menacwy Business)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 330/01)
On 9 September 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7716. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-365/14: Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — CBM v OHIM — Aeronautica Militare (TRECOLORE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark TRECOLORE — Earlier Community and national word and figurative marks FRECCE TRICOLORI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-10-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, leather, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015398EN.01005301.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/53





Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — CBM v OHIM — Aeronautica Militare (TRECOLORE)
(Case T-365/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark TRECOLORE - Earlier Community and national word and figurative marks FRECCE TRICOLORI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 398/67)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Lüken, M. Grundmann and N. Kerger, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Aeronautica Militare — Stato Maggiore (Rome, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 April 2014 (Case R 411/2013-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Aeronautica Militare — Stato Maggiore and CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.
Case T-187/14: Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Sonova Holding v OHIM (Flex) (Community trade mark — Community word mark FLEX — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-10-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical device, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015398EN.01004601.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/46





Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Sonova Holding v OHIM (Flex)
(Case T-187/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Community word mark FLEX - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 398/58)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sonova Holding AG (Stäfa, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Hawkes, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 December 2013 (Case R 357/2013-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign FLEX as a community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Sonova Holding AG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1865 of 7 October 2015 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Cipolla bianca di Margherita (PGI))
Date: 2015-10-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Apulia, Italy, bulb vegetable, designation of origin, fresh product, labelling, product designation








L_2015275EN.01000301.xml










20.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 275/3








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1865
of 7 October 2015
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Cipolla bianca di Margherita (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Cipolla bianca di Margherita’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cipolla bianca di Margherita’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Cipolla bianca di Margherita’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. — Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 7 October 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 189, 6.6.2015, p. 17.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case T-534/13: Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Panrico v OHIM — HDN Development (Krispy Kreme DOUGHNUTS) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark Krispy Kreme DOUGHNUTS — Earlier national and international word and figurative marks DONUT, DOGHNUTS, donuts and donuts cream — Relative ground of refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Likelihood of profit derived unduly from the distinctive character or reputation — Risk of detriment — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))
Date: 2015-10-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015398EN.01003501.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/35





Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Panrico v OHIM — HDN Development (Krispy Kreme DOUGHNUTS)
(Case T-534/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark Krispy Kreme DOUGHNUTS - Earlier national and international word and figurative marks DONUT, DOGHNUTS, donuts and donuts cream - Relative ground of refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Likelihood of profit derived unduly from the distinctive character or reputation - Risk of detriment - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)))
(2015/C 398/45)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Panrico SA (Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: D. Pellisé Urquiza, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: HDN Development Corp. (Frankfort, Kentucky, United States) (represented by: H. Granado Carpenter and M. Polo Carreňo, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 July 2013 (Case R 623/2011-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Panrico SA and HDN Development Corp.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action.










2.


Orders Panrico SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2014.