do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-54/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2015 — Nunes v Court of Auditors (Civil Service — Contract staff — Dispute concerning the terms of employment — Claim out of time — Failure to comply with the pre-litigation procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2015-09-30
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, contract staff, pay, staff regulations (EU), work contract








C_2015371EN.01004701.xml










9.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 371/47





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2015 — Nunes v Court of Auditors
(Case F-54/15)
((Civil Service - Contract staff - Dispute concerning the terms of employment - Claim out of time - Failure to comply with the pre-litigation procedure - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2015/C 371/49)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Carlos Nunes (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Petit, lawyer)

Defendant: European Court of Auditors

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision adopted by the European Court of Auditors in April 2009 to amend the applicant’s employment status and remuneration and application retroactively to adjust his remuneration from April 2009.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Mr Nunes shall bear his own costs.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1745 of 30 September 2015 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Hollandse maatjesharing/Hollandse Nieuwe/Holländischer Matjes (TSG))
Date: 2015-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, designation of origin, fresh fish, labelling, product designation








L_2015256EN.01000401.xml










1.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 256/4








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1745
of 30 September 2015
         
entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Hollandse maatjesharing/Hollandse Nieuwe/Holländischer Matjes (TSG))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Netherlands' application to register the name ‘Hollandse maatjesharing’/‘Hollandse Nieuwe’/‘Holländischer Matjes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Hollandse maatjesharing’/‘Hollandse Nieuwe’/‘Holländischer Matjes’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Hollandse maatjesharing’/‘Hollandse Nieuwe’/‘Holländischer Matjes’ (TSG) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.7. — Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.





This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 30 September 2015.


For the Commission


The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 156, 12.5.2015, p. 19.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7484 — Plastipak/APPE) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, plastics industry, waste recycling








C_2015322EN.01000102.xml










30.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 322/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7484 — Plastipak/APPE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 322/02)
On 11 June 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7484. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7379 — Mylan/Abbott EPD-DM) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, pharmaceutical industry








C_2015322EN.01000101.xml










30.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 322/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7379 — Mylan/Abbott EPD-DM)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 322/01)
On 28 January 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7379. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7734 — Lockheed Martin/Sikorsky Aircraft) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aeronautical industry, economic concentration, merger control








C_2015322EN.01000901.xml










30.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 322/9





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7734 — Lockheed Martin/Sikorsky Aircraft)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 322/09)






1.


On 22 September 2015 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Lockheed Martin Corporation (‘Lockheed Martin’, United States) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of a part of the undertaking United Technologies Corporation (‘UTC’, United States) — the business unit Sikorsky Aircraft (‘Sikorksy Aircraft’) and other parts of the undertaking - by way of a purchase of assets.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   Lockheed Martin: Lockheed Martin is a global security and aerospace company mainly active in the development, manufacture and sale of advanced technology systems;
—   UTC: UTC is a multinational corporation that provides high technology products and services for building systems and the aerospace industry;
—   Sikorsky Aircraft: Sikorsky Aircraft is specialised in the manufacturing and sale of military and civil helicopters and the supply of related services.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2), it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7734 — Lockheed Martin/Sikorsky Aircraft, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-385/14: Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2015 — Volkswagen v OHIM (ULTIMATE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word ULTIMATE — Absolute ground for refusal — Absence of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-09-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015389EN.01005102.xml










23.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 389/51





Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2015 — Volkswagen v OHIM (ULTIMATE)
(Case T-385/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word ULTIMATE - Absolute ground for refusal - Absence of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 389/57)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: U. Sander, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 March 2014 (Case R 1787/2013-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign ULTIMATE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders Volkswagen AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).






(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.
Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest








C_2015322EN.01000601.xml










30.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 322/6





Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 322/06)






Member State


France




Route concerned


Brest (Guipavas)-Ouessant




Period of validity of the contract


from 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2020




Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders


2 December 2015, 16.00, Paris time (France)




Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained







Conseil départemental du Finistère




Direction des Déplacements




M. Stéphane Marsille




32, boulevard Dupleix




CS 29029




29196 Quimper cedex




FRANCE




Tel. +33 298762052




E-mail: stephane.marsille@finistere.fr
Case T-720/13: Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2015 — GAT Microencapsulation v OHIM — BASF (KARIS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark KARIS — Earlier Community marks and earlier international word mark CARYX — Earlier national marks and earlier Benelux word mark AKRIS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-09-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, chemical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015389EN.01004202.xml










23.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 389/42





Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2015 — GAT Microencapsulation v OHIM — BASF (KARIS)
(Case T-720/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark KARIS - Earlier Community marks and earlier international word mark CARYX - Earlier national marks and earlier Benelux word mark AKRIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 389/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: GAT Microencapsulation GmbH (formerly GAT Microencapsulation AG) (Ebenfurth, Austria) (represented by: S. Soler Lerma and C. March Cabrelles, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. Harrington, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: BASF SE (Ludwigshafen, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 October 2013 (Case R 1862/2012-5) relating to opposition proceedings between BASF SE and GAT Microencapsulation GmbH (formerly GAT Microencapsulation AG).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Gat Microencapsulation GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7767 — FIS/SunGard) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, financial services, information technology industry, merger control








C_2015322EN.01000801.xml










30.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 322/8





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7767 — FIS/SunGard)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 322/08)






1.


On 22 September 2015, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Fidelity National Information Services Inc. (‘FIS’, USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertakings SunGard and SunGard Capital Corp. II (‘SunGard’, USA) by way of merging SunGard with a subsidiary of FIS.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for FIS: global provider of banking and payment technologies and services to the financial services industry
—   for SunGard: global provider of software and processing solutions.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7767 — FIS/SunGard, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.