do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-436/15 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — Consorzio Vivaisti viticoli pugliesi and Negro v Commission (Interim measures — Agriculture — Protective measures against pests of plants — Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the European Union of Xylella fastidiosa — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Failure to comply with the procedural requirements — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: import (EU), import restriction, plant disease, plant health control, vineyard








C_2015381EN.01004302.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/43





Order of the President of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — Consorzio Vivaisti viticoli pugliesi and Negro v Commission
(Case T-436/15 R)
((Interim measures - Agriculture - Protective measures against pests of plants - Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the European Union of Xylella fastidiosa - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility))
(2015/C 381/52)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicants: Consorzio Vivaisti viticoli pugliesi (Otrante, Italy) and Negro Daniele (Otrante) (represented by: V. Pellegrino and A. Micolani, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 of 18 May 2015 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) (OJ 2015 L 125, p. 36) in so far as that decision encompasses grapevine varieties grown in the province of Lecce.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


Costs are reserved.
Case F-72/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 21 September 2015 — Anagnostu and Others v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Promotion — 2010 and 2011 promotion procedures — Reference multiplication rates — Article 6(2) of the Staff Regulations — Transitional measures for the period between 1 May 2004 and 30 April 2011 — Article 9 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — General Implementing Provisions of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Setting of promotion thresholds — Not included in the list of promoted officials — Interest in bringing proceedings)
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: administrator, directory, promotion, staff regulations (EU)








C_2015363EN.01004601.xml










3.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 363/46





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 21 September 2015 — Anagnostu and Others v Commission
(Case F-72/11) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Promotion - 2010 and 2011 promotion procedures - Reference multiplication rates - Article 6(2) of the Staff Regulations - Transitional measures for the period between 1 May 2004 and 30 April 2011 - Article 9 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - General Implementing Provisions of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Setting of promotion thresholds - Not included in the list of promoted officials - Interest in bringing proceedings))
(2015/C 363/54)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Anastasios Anagnostu (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Belgium) and 24 other applicants (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application, firstly, for annulment of the decisions setting the promotion thresholds for the 2010 and 2011 procedures as regards grades AD 13 and AD 14 and, secondly, for annulment of the list of officials promoted to grades AD 13 and AD 14 for the 2010 exercise and annulment of the Commission’s implied decision not to promote a larger number of other officials to grades AD 12 or AD 13.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decisions of the European Commission of 26 November 2010 not to promote Mr Antoulas, Ms Bruni, Ms Nicolaidou-Kallergis and Mr Xanthopoulos;










2.


Dismisses the remainder of the action;










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear four twenty-fifths of its own costs and to pay four twenty-fifths of the costs incurred by the applicants;










4.


Orders the applicants other than Mr Antoulas, Ms Bruni, Ms Nicolaidou-Kallergis and Mr Xanthopoulos to bear twenty-one twenty-fifths of their own costs and to pay twenty-one twenty-fifths of the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 290, 1.10.2011, p. 20.
Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union








C_2015311EN.01000101.xml










21.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/1





Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 311/01)

Last publication


OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.

Past publications


OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

OJ C 279, 24.8.2015.

OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.

OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.

OJ C 254, 3.8.2015.

OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.
These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
Case F-123/15: Action brought on 21 September 2015 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, competition (EU)








C_2015398EN.01007901.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/79





Action brought on 21 September 2015 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-123/15)
(2015/C 398/94)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the selection board in competition EPSO/AD/293/14 not to award the applicant a sufficient number of points for admission to the assessment centre.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:






—


annul the decision of 11 June 2015 by which the selection board in competition EPSO/AD/293/14 refused to admit the applicant to the selection tests held at the assessment centre;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.
Case C-493/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 21 September 2015 — Agenzia delle Entrate v Marco Identi
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, bankruptcy, basis of tax assessment, debt








C_2015406EN.01002001.xml










7.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 406/20






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 21 September 2015 — Agenzia delle Entrate v Marco Identi
(Case C-493/15)
(2015/C 406/20)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Agenzia delle Entrate

Respondent: Marco Identi

Question referred

Must Article 4(3) TEU and Articles 2 and 22 of Sixth Directive 77/388 (1) on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes be interpreted as precluding the application, in relation to value added tax, of a provision of national law which provides for the extinguishment of debts arising from VAT in favour of taxable persons admitted to the bankruptcy discharge procedure governed by Articles 142 and 143 of Royal Decree No 267/1942?


(1)  Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).
Case T-10/15 P: Order of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Appeal — Civil service — EIB staff — Psychological harassment — Inquiry procedure — Report of the Committee of Inquiry — Incorrect definition of psychological harassment — Decision of the President of the EIB not to follow up the complaint)
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, disciplinary proceedings, medical report, psychological harassment








C_2015381EN.01004002.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/40





Order of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — De Nicola v EIB
(Case T-10/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - EIB staff - Psychological harassment - Inquiry procedure - Report of the Committee of Inquiry - Incorrect definition of psychological harassment - Decision of the President of the EIB not to follow up the complaint))
(2015/C 381/48)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: G. Nuvoli and E. Raimond, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 11 November in De Nicola v EIB (F-52/11, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:243), and seeking that that judgment be set aside.

Operative part of the order

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal.










2.


Orders Mr Carlo De Nicola to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.
Case T-437/15 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — Eden Green Vivai Piante di Verdesca Giuseppe and Others v Commission (Interim measures — Agriculture — Protective measures against pests of plants — Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the European Union of Xylella fastidiosa — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Failure to comply with the procedural requirements — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: import (EU), import restriction, plant disease, plant health control








C_2015381EN.01004401.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/44





Order of the President of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — Eden Green Vivai Piante di Verdesca Giuseppe and Others v Commission
(Case T-437/15 R)
((Interim measures - Agriculture - Protective measures against pests of plants - Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the European Union of Xylella fastidiosa - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility))
(2015/C 381/53)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicants: Eden Green Vivai Piante di Verdesca Giuseppe and Others (Copertino, Italy) and the other 37 applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: G. Manelli, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 of 18 May 2015 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) (OJ 2015 L 125, p. 36).

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


Costs are reserved.
Case C-492/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 21 September 2015 — R v S and T
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: custody, enforcement of ruling, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, matrimonial law, mutual recognition principle, parental responsibility, private international law








C_2015398EN.01001801.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/18





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 21 September 2015 — R v S and T
(Case C-492/15)
(2015/C 398/23)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Respondent and applicant: R

Applicants and respondents: S and T

Question referred

Does Article 35(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (1) of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility (Brussels IIa Regulation) preclude a stay, by the appellate court, of proceedings for non-recognition under Article 21(3) of the regulation or for a declaration of enforceability under Article 28 et seq. of the regulation if an application is lodged in the Member State of enforcement for amendment of the judgment on rights of custody of the State of origin which is to be declared enforceable and the Member State of enforcement has international jurisdiction for that application for amendment?


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1).
Case F-71/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 September 2015 — De Simone v ECDC
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, report, staff assessment








C_2015363EN.01004902.xml










3.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 363/49





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 September 2015 — De Simone v ECDC
(Case F-71/15) (1)

(2015/C 363/59)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015, p. 50.
Case T-848/14 P: Order of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Appeal — Civil service — EIB staff — Reports — Promotion — 2006 evaluation and assessment exercises — Psychological harassment — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, promotion, psychological harassment








C_2015381EN.01003902.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/39





Order of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — De Nicola v EIB
(Case T-848/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - EIB staff - Reports - Promotion - 2006 evaluation and assessment exercises - Psychological harassment - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))
(2015/C 381/46)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: G. Nuvoli and E. Raimond, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 11 November 2014 in De Nicola v EIB (F-55/08 RENV, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:244), and seeking that that judgment be set aside.

Operative part of the order

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal.










2.


Orders Mr Carlo De Nicola to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.
Opinion 3/15: Request for an opinion submitted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: Court of Justice, Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: EU competence, facilities for people with disabilities, international convention, interpretation of the law, physically disabled person, ratification of an agreement








C_2015311EN.01001301.xml










21.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/13





Request for an opinion submitted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU
(Opinion 3/15)
(2015/C 311/15)
Language of procedure: all the official languages

Applicant

European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, B. Hartmann, J. Samnadda, Agents)

Question submitted to the Court

Does the European Union have exclusive competence to conclude the Marrakesh Treaty to facilitate access to published works for persons who are blind, visually impaired, or otherwise print disabled?
Case T-849/14 P: Order of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Appeal — Civil service — EIB staff — Annual assessment — Internal rules — Appeals procedure — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, psychological harassment, staff assessment








C_2015381EN.01004001.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/40





Order of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — De Nicola v EIB
(Case T-849/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - EIB staff - Annual assessment - Internal rules - Appeals procedure - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))
(2015/C 381/47)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: G. Nuvoli and E. Raimond, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 18 November 2014 in De Nicola v EIB (F-59/09 RENV, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:248), and seeking that that judgment be set aside.

Operative part of the order

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal.










2.


Orders Mr Carlo De Nicola to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.
Case C-500/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2015 by TVR Italia Srl against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 July 2015 in TVR Automotive v OHIM — TVR Italia (Case T-398/13)
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016090EN.01000201.xml










7.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 90/2





Appeal brought on 21 September 2015 by TVR Italia Srl against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 July 2015 in TVR Automotive v OHIM — TVR Italia (Case T-398/13)
(Case C-500/15 P)
(2016/C 090/02)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: TVR Italia Srl (represented by: F. Caricato, avvocato)

Other parties to the proceedings: TVR Automotive Ltd and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
By order of 14 January 2016 the Court (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1756 of 21 September 2015 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Citron de Menton (PGI))
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, citrus fruit, designation of origin, labelling, product designation








L_2015257EN.01001101.xml










2.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 257/11








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1756
of 21 September 2015
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Citron de Menton (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Citron de Menton’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Citron de Menton’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Citron de Menton’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 21 September 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 147, 5.5.2015, p. 11.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case C-1/15 SA: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2015 — La Chaîne hôtelière La Frontière, Shotef SPRL v European Commission (Application for authorisation to serve an attachment order on the European Commission)
Date: 2015-09-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, claim, seizure of goods








C_2016038EN.01001602.xml










1.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/16





Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2015 — La Chaîne hôtelière La Frontière, Shotef SPRL v European Commission
(Case C-1/15 SA) (1)

((Application for authorisation to serve an attachment order on the European Commission))
(2016/C 038/23)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: La Chaîne hôtelière La Frontière, Shotef SPRL (represented by: J.-Y. Steyt, avocat)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the order







1.


The application is dismissed.










2.


La Chaîne hôtelière La Frontière, Shotef SPRL is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.