do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 on the denomination of an interparliamentary delegation (2015/2842(RSO))
Date: 2015-09-09
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: EP delegation, EU relations, Palestine question, interparliamentary delegation








C_2017316EN.01027401.xml










22.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 316/274





P8_TA(2015)0297
Denomination of an interparliamentary delegation
European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 on the denomination of an interparliamentary delegation (2015/2842(RSO))
(2017/C 316/33)

The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the proposal of the Conference of Presidents,










—


having regard to its decision of 12 March 2014 on the number of interparliamentary delegations, delegations to joint parliamentary committees and delegations to parliamentary cooperation committees and to multilateral parliamentary assemblies (1),










—


having regard to Rule 212 of its Rules of Procedure,












1.


Decides that its delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council shall be renamed ‘Delegation for relations with Palestine’;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.






(1)  Texts adopted of that date, P7_TA(2014)0217.
Case T-584/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Inditex v OHIM — Ansell (ZARA) (Community trade mark — Proceedings for revocation — Community word mark ZARA — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2015346EN.01002901.xml










19.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/29





Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Inditex v OHIM — Ansell (ZARA)
(Case T-584/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Proceedings for revocation - Community word mark ZARA - Genuine use - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 346/34)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Industria de Diseño Textil (Inditex) (Arteixo, Spain) (represented by: C. Duch Fonoll, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Zainab Ansell and Roger Ansell (Moshi, Tanzania)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 May 2014 (Case R 1118/2013-2), relating to proceedings for revocation between Zainab Ansell and Roger Ansell, on one hand, and Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex), on the other hand.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 339, 29.9.2014.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 9 September 2015 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Protocol between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Cape Verde (15848/2014 — C8-0003/2015 — 2014/0329(NLE))
Date: 2015-09-09
Institutions: Committee on Budgets, Committee on Development, Committee on Fisheries, European Parliament
Subjects: Cabo Verde, agreement (EU), catch quota, financial compensation of an agreement, fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing rights, protocol to an agreement, ratification of an agreement, sea fishing








C_2017316EN.01028801.xml










22.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 316/288





P8_TA(2015)0300
Fisheries partnership agreement with Cape Verde: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (consent) ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 9 September 2015 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Protocol between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Cape Verde (15848/2014 — C8-0003/2015 — 2014/0329(NLE))
(Consent)
(2017/C 316/39)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (15848/2014),










—


having regard to the draft protocol between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Cape Verde (15849/2014),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43, Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0003/2015),










—


having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 9 September 2015 (1) on the draft Council decision,










—


having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets (A8-0201/2015),












1.


Gives its consent to conclusion of the Protocol;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Cape Verde.






(1)  Texts adopted of that date, P8_TA(2015)0301.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7622 — Dufry/World Duty Free) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-09-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: airport, economic concentration, merger control, retail trade, tourism








C_2015297EN.01000101.xml










9.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7622 — Dufry/World Duty Free)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 297/01)
On 5 August 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7622. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the suspension or closure of a sitting (interpretation of Rule 191 of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2153(REG))
Date: 2015-09-09
Institutions: Committee on Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: interpretation of the law, rules of procedure








C_2017316EN.01027301.xml










22.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 316/273





P8_TA(2015)0296
Suspension or closure of a sitting (interpretation of Rule 191 of the Rules of Procedure)
European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the suspension or closure of a sitting (interpretation of Rule 191 of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2153(REG))
(2017/C 316/32)

The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the letter of 4 September 2015 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,










—


having regard to Rule 226 of its Rules of Procedure,












1.


Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 191 of the Rules of Procedure:
‘If a request to suspend or close the sitting is presented, the procedure to vote on that request is to be initiated without undue delay. The usual means of announcing plenary votes should be used and, in line with existing practice, sufficient time should be given for Members to reach the Chamber.
By analogy with the second subparagraph of Rule 152(2), if such a request has been rejected, a similar request cannot be tabled again during the same day. In accordance with the interpretation to Rule 22(1), the President has the right to put an end to excessive use of requests presented under this Rule.’












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.
Case T-168/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Pérez Gutiérrez v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Public health — Directive 2011/37/EC — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products — Colour photographs proposed by the Commission as health warnings to appear on tobacco packages — Decision 2003/641/EC — Unauthorised use of the image of a deceased person — Harm suffered personally by the widow of the deceased person)
Date: 2015-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: copyright, labelling, protection of privacy, public health, tobacco industry








C_2015346EN.01002502.xml










19.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/25





Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Pérez Gutiérrez v Commission
(Case T-168/14) (1)

((Non-contractual liability - Public health - Directive 2011/37/EC - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products - Colour photographs proposed by the Commission as health warnings to appear on tobacco packages - Decision 2003/641/EC - Unauthorised use of the image of a deceased person - Harm suffered personally by the widow of the deceased person))
(2015/C 346/29)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Ana Pérez Gutiérrez (Mataró, Spain) (represented by: J. Soler Puebla, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and C. Cattabriga, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for damages seeking, firstly, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a consequence of the unauthorised use of her late husband’s picture among the photographs proposed by the Commission for the health warnings to be shown on tobacco packages pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 5(3) of Directive 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products (OJ 2001 L 194, p. 26) and Commission Decision 2003/641/EC of 5 September 2003 on the use of colour photographs or other illustrations as health warnings on tobacco packages (OJ 2003 L 226, p. 24) and, secondly, the withdrawal of her late husband’s picture and a prohibition on its use within the European Union.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ms Ana Pérez Gutiérrez to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 9 September 2015 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Republic of Madagascar and the European Community (15225/2014 — C8–0002/2015 — 2014/0319(NLE))
Date: 2015-09-09
Institutions: Committee on Budgets, Committee on Development, Committee on Fisheries, European Parliament
Subjects: Madagascar, agreement (EU), catch quota, financial compensation of an agreement, fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing rights, protocol to an agreement, ratification of an agreement, sea fishing








C_2017316EN.01028901.xml










22.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 316/289





P8_TA(2015)0302
Fisheries partnership agreement with Madagascar: fishing opportunities and financial contribution ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 9 September 2015 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Republic of Madagascar and the European Community (15225/2014 — C8–0002/2015 — 2014/0319(NLE))
(Consent)
(2017/C 316/40)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (15225/2014),










—


having regard to the draft protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Republic of Madagascar and the European Community (15226/2014),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43, Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 218(7), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8–0002/2015),










—


having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets (A8-0196/2015),












1.


Gives its consent to conclusion of the Protocol;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Madagascar.
Case T-66/15: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Alsharghawi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya — Action for failure to act — Council’s position — Subject-matter of the action ceasing to exist — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Libya, economic sanctions, international sanctions, powers of the institutions (EU)








C_2015381EN.01004101.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/41





Order of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Alsharghawi v Council
(Case T-66/15) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya - Action for failure to act - Council’s position - Subject-matter of the action ceasing to exist - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 381/49)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Bashir Saleh Bashir Alsharghawi (Johannesburg (South Africa) (represented by: E. Moutet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and A. Vitro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Declare, on the basis of Article 265 TFEU, that the Council unlawfully refrained from re-examining its decision to include the applicant’s name on the list of persons and entities covered by the restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 146, 4.5.2015.