do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 163/2011 of 19 December 2011 amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement (OJ L 76, 15.3.2012)
Date: 2015-09-08
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Aviation Safety Agency, European Economic Area, air safety, air traffic, aircraft, civil aviation, crew, operation of the Institutions, revision of an agreement, transport authorisation, transport licence








L_2015234EN.01002702.xml










8.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 234/27







Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 163/2011 of 19 December 2011 amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 76 of 15 March 2012
)


On page 53, in the Annex, point 3(d)(ii):
for:

               ‘… on the basis of certificates issue …’,
read:

               ‘… on the basis of certificates issued …’.
Case T-564/12: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Ministry of Energy of Iran v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Breach of fundamental rights — Proportionality)
Date: 2015-09-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Iran, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, fundamental rights, international sanctions, nuclear non-proliferation, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence, trade restriction








C_2015346EN.01001502.xml










19.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/15





Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Ministry of Energy of Iran v Council
(Case T-564/12) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Error of assessment - Breach of fundamental rights - Proportionality))
(2015/C 346/17)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ministry of Energy of Iran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: M. Lester, Barrister)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and A. De Elera, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 58) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2012 of 15 October 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 16).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Ministry of Energy of Iran to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 55, 23.2.2013.
Information concerning the extension of the International Sugar Agreement, 1992
Date: 2015-09-08
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: commodity agreement, renewal of an agreement, sugar, trade agreement (EU)








L_2015234EN.01000601.xml










8.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 234/6







Information concerning the extension of the International Sugar Agreement, 1992

At its 47th session (Antigua, Guatemala, 25 June 2015), the International Sugar Council decided to extend the International Sugar Agreement (1992) (1) for a period of two years until 31 December 2017.


(1)  
            OJ L 379, 23.12.1992, p. 16.
Case C-13/15: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 September 2015 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Criminal proceedings against Cdiscount SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Directive 2005/29/EC — Consumer protection — Unfair commercial practices — Price reduction — Marking or display of reference price)
Date: 2015-09-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, reference price, restriction on competition, single market








C_2015398EN.01000901.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/9





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 September 2015 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Criminal proceedings against Cdiscount SA
(Case C-13/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Directive 2005/29/EC - Consumer protection - Unfair commercial practices - Price reduction - Marking or display of reference price))
(2015/C 398/11)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Criminal proceedings against

Cdiscount SA

Operative part of the order

Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) must be interpreted as precluding provisions of national law, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which lay down a general prohibition of announcements of price reductions which do not show the reference price when the price is marked or displayed, without providing for an assessment case by case allowing it to be determined whether the announcements are unfair, in so far as those provisions pursue objectives relating to consumer protection. It is for the referring court to determine whether that is so in the case in the main proceedings.


(1)  OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7756 — Providence Equity/Chime) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-09-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: advertising, communications industry, economic concentration, financial institution, merger control, sport








C_2015295EN.01000401.xml










8.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/4





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7756 — Providence Equity/Chime)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 295/05)






1.


On 28 August 2015, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Providence Equity Partners L.L.C. (‘Providence Equity’, US) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Chime Communications plc (‘Chime’, UK), by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Providence Equity: private equity fund,
—   for Chime: international communications and sports marketing group.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7756 — Providence Equity/Chime, to the following address :





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.