do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-509/15: Action brought on 3 September 2015 — Kessel medintim v OHIM — Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Premeno)
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medicinal product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015354EN.01004501.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/45





Action brought on 3 September 2015 — Kessel medintim v OHIM — Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Premeno)
(Case T-509/15)
(2015/C 354/55)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Kessel medintim GmbH (Mörfelden-Walldorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Jacob and U. Staudenmaier, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Neuss, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Premeno’ — Application No 6 408 926

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 July 2015 in Case R 349/2015-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and dismiss the opposition;










—


in the alternative: refer the opposition back to OHIM for a new decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the cost of the proceedings in accordance with Article 134(1) TFEU.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 75(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-110/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Oradea — Romania) — Horațiu Ovidiu Costea v SC Volksbank România SA (Request for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 2(b) — Concept of ‘consumer’ — Credit agreement concluded by a natural person who practises as a lawyer — Repayment of a loan secured on a building owned by the borrower’s law firm — Borrower who has the necessary knowledge to assess the unfairness of a term before signing the agreement)
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, lawyer, mortgage, mortgage bank, real estate credit, unfair terms of contract








C_2015354EN.01000601.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/6





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Oradea — Romania) — Horațiu Ovidiu Costea v SC Volksbank România SA
(Case C-110/14) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Article 2(b) - Concept of ‘consumer’ - Credit agreement concluded by a natural person who practises as a lawyer - Repayment of a loan secured on a building owned by the borrower’s law firm - Borrower who has the necessary knowledge to assess the unfairness of a term before signing the agreement))
(2015/C 354/06)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Judecătoria Oradea

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Horațiu Ovidiu Costea

Defendant: SC Volksbank România SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(b) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that a natural person who practises as a lawyer and concludes a credit agreement with a bank, in which the purpose of the credit is not specified, may be regarded as a ‘consumer’ within the meaning of that provision, where that agreement is not linked to that lawyer’s profession. The fact that the debt arising out of the same contract is secured by a mortgage taken out by that person in his capacity as representative of his law firm and involving goods intended for the exercise of that person’s profession, such as a building belonging to that firm, is not relevant in that regard.


(1)  OJ C 175, 10.6.2014.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015289EN.01000501.xml










3.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/5





Euro exchange rates (1)

2 September 2015
(2015/C 289/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1255




JPY


Japanese yen


135,21




DKK


Danish krone


7,4632




GBP


Pound sterling


0,73690




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4968




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0867




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,3015




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,023




HUF


Hungarian forint


313,95




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2359




RON


Romanian leu


4,4403




TRY


Turkish lira


3,3126




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6061




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4919




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7226




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7766




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5938




KRW


South Korean won


1 332,76




ZAR


South African rand


15,1480




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1537




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5535




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 920,10




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7391




PHP


Philippine peso


52,647




RUB


Russian rouble


75,8536




THB


Thai baht


40,250




BRL


Brazilian real


4,1992




MXN


Mexican peso


19,0198




INR


Indian rupee


74,5011






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-520/13: Order of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — Philip Morris Benelux v Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Draft impact assessment report prepared in the context of the proposal for a revision of the directive on tobacco products — Refusal to grant access — Disclosure after commencement of the action — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, environmental impact, provision of documents, tobacco industry








C_2015381EN.01002702.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/27





Order of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — Philip Morris Benelux v Commission
(Case T-520/13) (1)

((Access to documents of the institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Draft impact assessment report prepared in the context of the proposal for a revision of the directive on tobacco products - Refusal to grant access - Disclosure after commencement of the action - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 381/29)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Philip Morris Benelux (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: K. Nordlander, lawyer, and P. Harrison, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 15 July 2013 refusing the request for access to preliminary drafts of the impact assessment report attached to the Commission’s proposal for a revised directive on tobacco products.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The European Commission shall pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by Philip Morris Benelux.






(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Case C-321/14: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Krefeld — Germany) — Colena AG v Karnevalservice Bastian GmbH (Request for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Cosmetic products — Consumer protection — Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 — Scope — Non-corrective colour contact lenses featuring designs — Statement on the outer packaging describing the product in question as a cosmetic product — Consumer protection)
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: approximation of laws, consumer protection, cosmetic product, labelling, optical industry








C_2015354EN.01000901.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/9





Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Krefeld — Germany) — Colena AG v Karnevalservice Bastian GmbH
(Case C-321/14) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Cosmetic products - Consumer protection - Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 - Scope - Non-corrective colour contact lenses featuring designs - Statement on the outer packaging describing the product in question as a cosmetic product - Consumer protection))
(2015/C 354/10)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Krefeld

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Colena AG

Defendant: Karnevalservice Bastian GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products must be interpreted as meaning that non-corrective colour contact lenses featuring designs do not fall within the scope of that regulation, notwithstanding the fact that their outer packaging bears the statement ‘cosmetic eye accessory, subject to the EU Cosmetics Directive’.


(1)  OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7676 — GKN/Fokker) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aeronautical industry, economic concentration, electronic equipment, merger control, motor vehicle industry, powder metallurgy, provision of services








C_2015289EN.01000101.xml










3.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7676 — GKN/Fokker)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 289/01)
On 28 August 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7676. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-250/15: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Vivium SA v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Insufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, appeal to an administrative authority, constitutional court, judgment of the Court (EU), legislation








C_2015381EN.01001102.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/11





Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Vivium SA v Belgische Staat
(Case C-250/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Insufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2015/C 381/13)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Vivium SA

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling brought by the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (Belgium) by decision of 13 May 2015 (Case C-250/15) is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.
Case T-676/14: Order of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — Spain v Commission (Action for annulment — Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1173/2011 — Effective enforcement of budgetary surveillance in the euro area — Manipulation of statistics — Commission decision to initiate an investigation — Act not amenable to review — Preparatory act — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: budget deficit, budgetary control, euro area, financial statistics, infringement procedure (EU), public debt, sanction (EU), statistics








C_2015381EN.01003501.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/35





Order of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — Spain v Commission
(Case T-676/14) (1)

((Action for annulment - Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1173/2011 - Effective enforcement of budgetary surveillance in the euro area - Manipulation of statistics - Commission decision to initiate an investigation - Act not amenable to review - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility))
(2015/C 381/40)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, Abogado del Estado)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne, J. Baquero Cruz and M. Clausen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 4856 final of 11 July 2014 on launching of an investigation related to the manipulation of statistics in Spain as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 1173/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the effective enforcement of budgetary surveillance in the euro area.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


The Kingdom of Spain shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 388, 3.11.2014.
Case C-89/14: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — A2A SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate (Request for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Determination of the calculation of interest relating to the recovery of aid that is incompatible with the common market — Simple or compound interest — National legislation referring, for the calculation of interest, to Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 — Recovery decision notified before that regulation entered into force)
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, interest, reimbursement of aid








C_2015354EN.01000502.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/5





Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — A2A SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate
(Case C-89/14) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Determination of the calculation of interest relating to the recovery of aid that is incompatible with the common market - Simple or compound interest - National legislation referring, for the calculation of interest, to Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 - Recovery decision notified before that regulation entered into force))
(2015/C 354/05)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: A2A SpA

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate

Operative part of the judgment

Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, and Articles 11 and 13 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Regulation No 659/1999, do not preclude national legislation, such as Article 24(4) of Decree-Law No 185/2008 of 29 November 2008, on urgent measures to support families, work, employment and business, and to restructure the national strategic framework to combat the crisis, converted into law, with amendments, by Law No 2 of 28 January 2009, which, by means of a reference to Regulation No 794/2004, provides for the application of compound interest to the recovery of State aid, even though the decision declaring that aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery was adopted and notified to the Member State concerned before that regulation entered into force.


(1)  OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
Case C-383/14: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) v Société Sodiaal International (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the European Union’s financial interests — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Article 3 — Recovery of Community aid — Administrative penalty — Administrative measures — Limitation period)
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative measure, administrative procedure, administrative sanction, limitation of legal proceedings, reimbursement of aid








C_2015354EN.01000902.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/9





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) v Société Sodiaal International
(Case C-383/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 - Article 3 - Recovery of Community aid - Administrative penalty - Administrative measures - Limitation period))
(2015/C 354/11)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer)

Defendant: Société Sodiaal International

Operative part of the judgment

The fourth subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests must be interpreted as meaning that the limitation which it lays down is applicable not only to proceedings concerning irregularities which lead to the imposition of administrative penalties within the meaning of Article 5 thereof but also to proceedings which lead to the adoption of administrative measures within the meaning of Article 4 thereof.


(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014.
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1485 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic apply
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Central African Republic, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2015289EN.01000401.xml










3.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/4





Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1485 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic apply
(2015/C 289/04)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1485 (3).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union, represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council, and the department entrusted with the processing operation is Unit 1C, which can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 224/2014, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1485.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 70, 11.3.2014, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 229, 3.9.2015, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
Case C-466/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 3 September 2015 — Jean-Michel Adrien, Frédéric Baron, Catherine Blanchin, Marc Bouillaguet, Anne-Sophie Chalhoub, Denis d’Ersu, Laurent Gravière, Vincent Cador, Roland Moustache, Jean Richard de la Tour, Anne Schneider, Bernard Stamm and Eléonore von Bardeleben v Premier ministre, Ministre des finances et des comptes publics, Ministre de la décentralisation et de la fonction publique
Date: 2015-09-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU institution, EU law - national law, European official, expatriate worker, pension scheme, social-security contribution








C_2015381EN.01001802.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/18





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 3 September 2015 — Jean-Michel Adrien, Frédéric Baron, Catherine Blanchin, Marc Bouillaguet, Anne-Sophie Chalhoub, Denis d’Ersu, Laurent Gravière, Vincent Cador, Roland Moustache, Jean Richard de la Tour, Anne Schneider, Bernard Stamm and Eléonore von Bardeleben v Premier ministre, Ministre des finances et des comptes publics, Ministre de la décentralisation et de la fonction publique
(Case C-466/15)
(2015/C 381/22)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Jean-Michel Adrien, Frédéric Baron, Catherine Blanchin, Marc Bouillaguet, Anne-Sophie Chalhoub, Denis d’Ersu, Laurent Gravière, Vincent Cador, Roland Moustache, Jean Richard de la Tour, Anne Schneider, Bernard Stamm and Eléonore von Bardeleben

Defendants: Premier ministre, Ministre des finances et des comptes publics, Ministre de la décentralisation et de la fonction publique

Question referred

Is national legislation which permits an official on secondment to an institution of the European Union to choose, for the duration of his secondment, either to suspend his payment of contributions to the pension scheme in his State of origin, in which case his pension under that scheme is fully aggregated with the retirement benefits connected with the secondment, or to continue with the payments, in which case his pension under that scheme is limited to the amount required in order to bring the total amount of the pensions, including the pension acquired under the scheme applicable to the position to which he is seconded, to the amount of the pension he would have acquired if he had not been seconded contrary to the obligations under Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, read in the light of Article 48 TFEU, and to the principle of sincere cooperation referred to in Article 4 of the Treaty on the European Union?