do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-674/14: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2015 — SEA v Commission
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, aid to undertakings, airport, control of State aid, equal treatment, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality








C_2015381EN.01006101.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/61





Order of the General Court of 2 September 2015 — SEA v Commission
(Case T-674/14) (1)

(2015/C 381/84)
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 388, 3.11.2014.
Case T-507/15: Action brought on 2 September 2015 — Poland v Commission
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, EU financing arrangements, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, financial loss, principle of legal certainty, rural development








C_2015354EN.01004401.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/44





Action brought on 2 September 2015 — Poland v Commission
(Case T-507/15)
(2015/C 354/54)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


annul Commission Implementing Decision (EU) No 2015/1119 of 22 June 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2015) 4076) (OJ 2015 L 182, p. 39) in so far as it excludes from European Union financing the amounts of EUR 1 42  446,05 and EUR 5 5 3 75  053,74 paid by the accredited paying agency of the Republic of Poland;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law: infringement of Article 52(1) of Regulation No 1306/2013 (1) and breach of the principle of legal certainty and the principle of protection of legitimate expectations by applying a financial correction on the basis of incorrect findings of fact and incorrect interpretation of the law, even though the expenditure was carried out by the Polish authorities in accordance with the EU provisions.










2.


Second plea in law: infringement of Article 52(2) of Regulation No 1306/2013 by applying a flat-rate correction in an amount grossly disproportionate to the risk of possible financial loss to the EU budget.






(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 549).
Case T-504/15: Action brought on 2 September 2015 — Rafhaelo Gutti v OHIM — Transformados del Sur (CAMISERIA LA ESPAÑOLA)
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015354EN.01004302.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/43





Action brought on 2 September 2015 — Rafhaelo Gutti v OHIM — Transformados del Sur (CAMISERIA LA ESPAÑOLA)
(Case T-504/15)
(2015/C 354/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Rafhaelo Gutti, SL (Loja, Spain) (represented by: I. L. Sempere Massa, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Transformados del Sur, SA (Seville, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘CAMISERIA LA ESPAÑOLA’ — Application for registration No 11 641 818

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 July 2015 in Case R 2424/2014-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM in Case R 2424/2014-4, in turn annul Opposition B 2 226 655 and grant the application for Community trade mark 11 641 818 CAMISERIA LA ESPAÑOLA for goods in Class 25 which have been refused registration.










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/294/14 — Administrators (AD 6) in the field of data protection
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, competition (EU), data protection








CA2015288EN.01000201.xml










2.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 288/2





RESERVE LIST
OPEN COMPETITION
EPSO/AD/294/14
ADMINISTRATORS (AD 6) IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROTECTION
(2015/C 288 A/02)
 






BYK


Guillaume




COSTA


Graça




D’CUNHA


Christian




DE LOCHT


Priscilla




SZILVASSY


Zsofia




FIERRO SEDANO


Elena




GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ


Manuel




GAYREL


Claire




HOMANN


Dirk




KAMPOURAKI


Kostoula




LANGFELDT


Owe




LAREO


Xabier




LIM


Laurent




MATTER


Olivier




PAVESI


Francesca




PEREZ GUTIERREZ


Nayra




ROBERT


Romain




SCHILMOLLER


Anne




SPINA


Alessandro




TEPINA


Polona




VEREECKEN


Isabelle




The reserve list will be valid until 14 July 2018.
Case C-386/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles — France) — Groupe Steria SCA v Ministère des Finances et des Comptes publics (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tax legislation — Freedom of establishment — Directive 90/435/EEC — Article 4(2) — Cross-border distributions of dividends — Corporation tax — Group taxation (French intégration fiscale) — Tax exemption for dividends paid by subsidiaries belonging to the tax-integrated group — Residence qualification — Dividends paid by non-resident subsidiaries — Non-deductible costs and expenses relating to the holding)
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: corporation tax, parent company, right of establishment, subsidiary, tax exemption, tax law, tax relief








C_2015354EN.01001001.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/10





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles — France) — Groupe Steria SCA v Ministère des Finances et des Comptes publics
(Case C-386/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Tax legislation - Freedom of establishment - Directive 90/435/EEC - Article 4(2) - Cross-border distributions of dividends - Corporation tax - Group taxation (French intégration fiscale) - Tax exemption for dividends paid by subsidiaries belonging to the tax-integrated group - Residence qualification - Dividends paid by non-resident subsidiaries - Non-deductible costs and expenses relating to the holding))
(2015/C 354/12)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Groupe Steria SCA

Defendant: Ministère des Finances et des Comptes publics

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding rules of a Member State that govern a tax integration regime under which a tax-integrated parent company is entitled to neutralisation as regards the add-back of a proportion of costs and expenses, fixed at 5 % of the net amount of the dividends received by it from tax-integrated resident companies, when such neutralisation is refused to it under those rules as regards the dividends distributed to it from subsidiaries located in another Member State, which, had they been resident, would have been eligible in practice, if they so elected.


(1)  OJ C 372, 20.10.2014.
Addendum to the reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AST-SC/01/14 — Assistants (SC 1/SC 2) in the secretarial field
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, France, assistant, competition (EU), secretarial staff








CA2015288EN.01000101.xml










2.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 288/1





ADDENDUM TO THE RESERVE LISTS (1)

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST-SC/01/14
ASSISTANTS (SC 1/SC 2)
IN THE SECRETARIAL FIELD
(2015/C 288 A/01)
 

Having French as their main language (SC 1)







BURZIC


Azra




CARRERA MURILLO


Sonia




GUEZ


Léa




This addendum will be valid until 17 July 2016.


(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly have requested her/his name not be published.
Case C-309/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL), Istituto Nazionale Confederale Assistenza (INCA) v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero dell’Interno, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents — Directive 2003/109/EC — National legislation — Issue and renewal of a residence permit — Condition — Obligatory financial contribution — Amount eight times higher than that for obtaining a national identity card — Infringement of the principles of Directive 2003/109/EC)
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: foreign national, legal status, payment, residence permit








C_2015354EN.01000801.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/8





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL), Istituto Nazionale Confederale Assistenza (INCA) v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero dell’Interno, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze
(Case C-309/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents - Directive 2003/109/EC - National legislation - Issue and renewal of a residence permit - Condition - Obligatory financial contribution - Amount eight times higher than that for obtaining a national identity card - Infringement of the principles of Directive 2003/109/EC))
(2015/C 354/09)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL), Istituto Nazionale Confederale Assistenza (INCA)

Defendants: Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero dell’Interno, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents, as amended by Directive 2011/51/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2011, precludes national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires third-country nationals, when applying for the issue or renewal of a residence permit in the Member State concerned, to pay a fee which varies in amount between EUR 80 and EUR 200, inasmuch as such a fee is disproportionate in the light of the objective pursued by that directive and is liable to create an obstacle to the exercise of the rights conferred by that directive.


(1)  OJ C 339, 29.9.2014.
Case C-527/14: Order of the President of the Court of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Ukamaka Mary Jecinta Oruche, Nzubechukwu Emmanuel Oruche v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, in the presence of: Oberbürgermeister der Stadt Potsdam, Emeka Emmanuel Mary Oruche
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admission of aliens, family migration, foreign language, foreign national, integration of migrants








C_2015398EN.01002401.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/24





Order of the President of the Court of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Ukamaka Mary Jecinta Oruche, Nzubechukwu Emmanuel Oruche v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, in the presence of: Oberbürgermeister der Stadt Potsdam, Emeka Emmanuel Mary Oruche
(Case C-527/14) (1)

(2015/C 398/32)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.
Case C-127/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā Tiesa — Latvia) — Andrejs Surmačs v Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija (Request for a preliminary ruling — Directive 94/19/EC — Point 7 of Annex I — Deposit-guarantee scheme — Exclusion of certain depositors from the deposit-guarantee scheme — Exclusion of a ‘manager’)
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: bank deposit, credit institution, guarantee, manager








C_2015354EN.01000702.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/7





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā Tiesa — Latvia) — Andrejs Surmačs v Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija
(Case C-127/14) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Directive 94/19/EC - Point 7 of Annex I - Deposit-guarantee scheme - Exclusion of certain depositors from the deposit-guarantee scheme - Exclusion of a ‘manager’))
(2015/C 354/08)
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā Tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Andrejs Surmačs

Defendant: Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija

Operative part of the judgment







1)


The deposits excluded under point 7 of Annex I to Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes, as amended by Directive 2009/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009, are listed exhaustively in that provision, so that the Member States cannot provide, in their national law, for other categories of depositors who are not covered, in terms of the functions carried out, by the concepts listed in that point, in order for the exclusion from the deposit-guarantee to be applied to them.










2)


Point 7 of Annex I to Directive 94/19, as amended by Directive 2009/14, must be interpreted as meaning that the Member States may exclude from the guarantee laid down by that directive, as a manager, persons who, because of the function exercised within the credit institution, have, irrespective of the title of that function, a level of information and expertise which enables them to assess the actual financial situation and the risks associated with the activity of the credit institution.






(1)  OJ C 159, 26.5.2014.
Case C-464/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt (Austria) lodged on 2 September 2015 — Admiral Casinos & Entertainment AG v Balmatic Handelsgesellschaft m.b.H and Others
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: freedom to provide services, game of chance, monopoly, national law, principle of proportionality, right of establishment








C_2015398EN.01001601.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/16





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt (Austria) lodged on 2 September 2015 — Admiral Casinos & Entertainment AG v Balmatic Handelsgesellschaft m.b.H and Others
(Case C-464/15)
(2015/C 398/20)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Admiral Casinos & Entertainment AG

Defendants: Balmatic Handelsgesellschaft m.b.H, Robert Schnitzer, Suayip Polat KG, Ülkü Polat, Attila Juhas, Milazim Rexha

Question referred

Is Article 56 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that, in an assessment of the proportionality of a rule of national law which provides for a monopoly in the market for games of chance, the validity of that rule under EU law depends not only on the objective which it pursues but also on its effects, as definitively and empirically determined?
Case C-196/14: Order of the President of the Court of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Aachen — Germany) — Horst Hoeck v Hellenic Republic
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: official document, public debt, redemption








C_2015398EN.01002202.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/22





Order of the President of the Court of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Aachen — Germany) — Horst Hoeck v Hellenic Republic
(Case C-196/14) (1)

(2015/C 398/28)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 194, 24.6.2014.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7652 — Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich/Valida Holding) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, financial institution, financial services, merger control, pension scheme








C_2015288EN.01000102.xml










2.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7652 — Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich/Valida Holding)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 288/02)
On 26 August 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7652. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-463/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 2 September 2015 — Openbaar Ministerie v A
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, application of EU law, offence








C_2015363EN.01002501.xml










3.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 363/25





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 2 September 2015 — Openbaar Ministerie v A
(Case C-463/15)
(2015/C 363/31)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie

Defendant: A

Question referred

Do Article 2(4) and Article 4, paragraph 1, of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (1) permit the executing Member State to transpose those provisions into its national law in such a manner as to require that the act should be punishable under its law and that, under its law, a custodial sentence of a maximum period of at least twelve months is laid down for that act?


(1)  2002/584/JHA: Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7720 — Mahindra World City Developers/Sumitomo/JV) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, property development, property leasing, provision of services, real estate business








C_2015288EN.01000101.xml










2.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7720 — Mahindra World City Developers/Sumitomo/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 288/01)
On 26 August 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7720. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-09-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: carcinogenic substance, chemical compound, chemical product, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, toxic substance








C_2015288EN.01000301.xml










2.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/3





Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)
(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 288/04)

Decisions granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2015) 6004


1 September 2015


Diarsenic trioxide
EC No 215-481-4
CAS No 1327-53-3


Boliden Kokkola Oy, Outokummuntie 8, 67 101 Kokkola, Finland


REACH/15/2/0


The use of diarsenic trioxide in the purification of metal impurities from the leaching solution in the zinc electrowinning process


21 May 2027


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their economic feasibility for the applicant.






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm