do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-500/15: Action brought on 31 August 2015 — LG Electronics v OHIM — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (VIEWTY PRO)
Date: 2015-08-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, mobile phone, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015354EN.01004201.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/42





Action brought on 31 August 2015 — LG Electronics v OHIM — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (VIEWTY PRO)
(Case T-500/15)
(2015/C 354/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘VIEWTY PRO’ — Application for registration No 9 125 071

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2015 in Case R 1940/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea(s) in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-462/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 31 August 2015 — Verners Pudāns
Date: 2015-08-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aid to agriculture, common agricultural policy, eligibility criteria, tax collection, tax on income








C_2015381EN.01001801.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/18





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 31 August 2015 — Verners Pudāns
(Case C-462/15)
(2015/C 381/21)
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Verners Pudāns

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Question referred

Must Article 29(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 (1) establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, be interpreted as allowing, in principle, a Member State to apply income tax to payments under the support schemes listed in Annex I to that regulation?


(1)  OJ 2009 L 30, p. 16.
Case T-499/15: Action brought on 31 August 2015 — LG Electronics v OHIM — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (VIEWTY SMILE)
Date: 2015-08-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, mobile phone, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015354EN.01004101.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/41





Action brought on 31 August 2015 — LG Electronics v OHIM — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (VIEWTY SMILE)
(Case T-499/15)
(2015/C 354/50)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘VIEWTY SMILE’ — Application for registration No 9 125 601

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2015 in Joined Cases R 1565/2014-2 and R 1939/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea(s) in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-498/15: Action brought on 31 August 2015 — LG Electronics v OHIM — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (Viewty)
Date: 2015-08-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, mobile phone, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015337EN.01004501.xml










12.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 337/45





Action brought on 31 August 2015 — LG Electronics v OHIM — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (Viewty)
(Case T-498/15)
(2015/C 337/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Viewty’ — Application for registration No 6 266 531

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2015 in Joined Cases R 1935/2014-2 and R 1563/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.