do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-451/15 P: Appeal brought on 17 August 2015 by Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 16 June 2015 in Case T-395/14: Best-Lock (Europe) v EUIPO
Date: 2015-08-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2016270EN.01001401.xml










25.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/14





Appeal brought on 17 August 2015 by Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 16 June 2015 in Case T-395/14: Best-Lock (Europe) v EUIPO
(Case C-451/15 P)
(2016/C 270/18)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd (represented by: J. Becker, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 14 April 2016 the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
Action brought on 17 August 2015 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Principality of Liechtenstein (Case E-23/15)
Date: 2015-08-17
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: EFTA, Liechtenstein, infringement of EU law, medicine, national implementing measure, organ transplantation, public health, quality standard, safety standard








C_2015410EN.01000801.xml










10.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 410/8





Action brought on 17 August 2015 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Principality of Liechtenstein
(Case E-23/15)
(2015/C 410/07)
An action against the Principality of Liechtenstein was brought before the EFTA Court on 17 August 2015 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, represented by Markus Schneider, Clémence Perrin and Marlene Lie Hakkebo, acting as Agents of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, 35 Rue Belliard, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority requests the EFTA Court to:






1.


Declare that by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement Articles 15 and 16 of the Act referred to at 15zn of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2010/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantion, as corrected), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, within the time prescribed, Liechtenstein has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 31 of that Act and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement.










2.


Order Liechtenstein to bear the costs of these proceedings.





Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:







—


The application addresses the failure by the Principality of Liechtenstein to comply, no later than on 11 April 2015, with a reasoned opinion delivered by the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 11 February 2015 regarding that State’s failure to implement into its national legal order Directive 2010/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantation, as corrected, as referred to at point 15zn of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and as adapted to that Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto (‘the Act’).










—


The EFTA Surveillance Authority submits that Liechtenstein has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 31 of the Act and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement Articles 15 and 16 of the Acts within the time prescribed.
Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
Date: 2015-08-17
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union








C_2015270EN.01000101.xml










17.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/1






Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 270/01)

Last publication


OJ C 262, 10.8.2015


Past publications


OJ C 254, 3.8.2015


OJ C 245, 27.7.2015


OJ C 236, 20.7.2015


OJ C 228, 13.7.2015


OJ C 221, 6.7.2015


OJ C 213, 29.6.2015

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
Action brought on 17 August 2015 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Principality of Liechtenstein (Case E-22/15)
Date: 2015-08-17
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: EFTA, Liechtenstein, distributive trades, drug surveillance, illicit trade, industrial counterfeiting, infringement of EU law, market approval, medicinal product, national implementing measure








C_2015410EN.01000701.xml










10.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 410/7





Action brought on 17 August 2015 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Principality of Liechtenstein
(Case E-22/15)
(2015/C 410/06)
An action against the Principality of Liechtenstein was brought before the EFTA Court on 17 August 2015 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, represented by Markus Schneider, Clémence Perrin and Íris Ísberg, acting as Agents of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, 35 Rue Belliard, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority requests the EFTA Court to:






1.


Declare that by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 15q of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2011/62/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, as regards the prevention of entry into the legal supply chain of falsified medicinal products and Directive 2012/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 amending Directive 2001/83/EC as regards pharmacovigilance), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, within the time prescribed, Liechtenstein has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of the Acts and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement.










2.


Order Liechtenstein to bear the costs of these proceedings.





Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:







—


The application addresses the failure by the Principality of Liechtenstein to comply, no later than on 11 April 2015, with a reasoned opinion delivered by the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 11 February 2015 regarding that State’s failure to implement into its national legal order Directive 2011/62/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, as regards the prevention of entry into the legal supply chain of falsified medicinal products,

and

Directive 2012/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 amending Directive 2001/83/EC as regards pharmacovigilance, as referred to at point 15q of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and as adapted to that Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto (‘the Act’).










—


The EFTA Surveillance Authority submits that Liechtenstein has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of the Acts and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Acts within the time prescribed.
Case F-116/15: Action brought on 17 August 2015 — ZZ v OHIM
Date: 2015-08-17
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, change of job








C_2015328EN.01003701.xml










5.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 328/37





Action brought on 17 August 2015 — ZZ v OHIM
(Case F-116/15)
(2015/C 328/35)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to transfer the applicant from the department ‘International Cooperation and Legal Affairs’ to the department ‘Operations’

Form of order sought







—


Annul OHIM’s decision of 2 October 2014 to transfer the applicant from the ‘International Cooperation and Legal Affairs’ department to the ‘Operations’ department;










—


Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.
Case C-452/15 P: Appeal brought on 17 August 2015 by Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 16 June 2015 in Case T-396/14: Best-Lock (Europe) v EUIPO
Date: 2015-08-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2016270EN.01001402.xml










25.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/14





Appeal brought on 17 August 2015 by Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 16 June 2015 in Case T-396/14: Best-Lock (Europe) v EUIPO
(Case C-452/15 P)
(2016/C 270/19)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd (represented by: J. Becker, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 14 April 2016 the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.