do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1204 of 22 July 2015 on a temporary derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Kenya with regard to tuna loins (OJ L 195, 23.7.2015)
Date: 2015-07-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Kenya, derogation from EU law, import (EU), originating product, sea fish








L_2015196EN.01006701.xml










24.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 196/67







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1204 of 22 July 2015 on a temporary derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Kenya with regard to tuna loins

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 195 of 23 July 2015
)


On page 47, Article 5:
for:


                  ‘
                  “Derogation — Commission Implementing Decision 2015/…/EU”.’,

read:


                  ‘
                  “Derogation — Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1204”.’
Case C-404/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen (Germany) lodged on 24 July 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Pál Aranyosi
Date: 2015-07-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, arrest, criminal proceedings, extradition, fundamental rights, judicial cooperation, jurisdiction, mutual recognition principle








C_2015320EN.01001802.xml










28.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/18





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen (Germany) lodged on 24 July 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Pál Aranyosi
(Case C-404/15)
(2015/C 320/26)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen

Party/parties to the main proceedings

Pál Aranyosi

Other party: Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bremen

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 1(3) of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (2002/584/JHA) (1) to be interpreted as meaning that extradition for the purposes of prosecution is impermissible where there are strong indications that detention conditions in the issuing Member State infringe the fundamental rights of the person concerned and the fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union, or is it to be interpreted as meaning that, in such circumstances, the executing Member State can or must make the decision on the permissibility of extradition conditional upon an assurance that detention conditions are compliant? To that end, can or must the executing Member State lay down specific minimum requirements applicable to the detention conditions in respect of which an assurance is sought?










2.


Are Articles 5 and 6(1) of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (2002/584/JHA) to be interpreted as meaning that the issuing judicial authority is also entitled to give assurances that detention conditions are compliant, or do assurances in this regard remain subject to the domestic rules of competence in the issuing Member State?






(1)  OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1.
Case T-408/15: Action brought on 24 July 2015 — Globo Comunicação e Participações v OHIM (‘PLIM PLIM’ sounds)
Date: 2015-07-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, telecommunications, television, trade-mark law








C_2015320EN.01003601.xml










28.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/36





Action brought on 24 July 2015 — Globo Comunicação e Participações v OHIM (‘PLIM PLIM’ sounds)
(Case T-408/15)
(2015/C 320/53)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A. (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (represented by: E. Gaspar, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Trade mark at issue: Community sound mark ‘PLIM PLIM’ — Application for registration No 12 826 368

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 May 2015 in Case R 2945/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that Community trade mark No 12 826 368 is valid for the designation of Classes 9, 38 and 41;










—


annul the contested decision in part, in so far as it rejected the Community trade mark application;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1313 of 24 July 2015 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Artichaut du Roussillon (PGI)]
Date: 2015-07-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, Languedoc-Roussillon, consumer information, designation of origin, foodstuff, labelling, perennial vegetable, product designation








L_2015203EN.01000401.xml










31.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 203/4








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1313
of 24 July 2015
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Artichaut du Roussillon (PGI)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Artichaut du Roussillon’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Artichaut du Roussillon’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Artichaut du Roussillon’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruits, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 July 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 92, 19.3.2015, p. 38.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Notice concerning the entry into force of Decisions Nos 1/2014 to 5/2014 of the EU-Central America Association Council of 7 November 2014
Date: 2015-07-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Association Council (EU), Central America








L_2015196EN.01000101.xml










24.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 196/1







Notice concerning the entry into force of Decisions Nos 1/2014 to 5/2014 of the EU-Central America Association Council of 7 November 2014
         







 



Decision No 1/2014 of the EU-Central America Association Council of 7 November 2014 adopting its Rules of Procedure and those of the Association Committee.

In accordance with the provisions of the Sole Article, Decision 1 of the Association Council enters into force on 7 May 2015.










 



Decision No 2/2014 of the EU-Central America Association Council of 7 November 2014 adopting the Rules of Procedure governing Dispute Settlement under Title X and the Code of Conduct for members of panels and mediators.

In accordance with the provisions of the Sole Article, Decision 2 of the Association Council enters into force on 7 May 2015.










 



Decision No 3/2014 of the EU-Central America Association Council of 7 November 2014 adopting the List of Panellists.

In accordance with the provisions of the Sole Article, Decision 3 of the Association Council enters into force on 7 May 2015.










 



Decision No 4/2014 of the EU-Central America Association Council of 7 November 2014 adopting the List of Trade and Sustainable Development Experts.

In accordance with the provisions of the Sole Article, Decision 4 of the Association Council enters into force on 7 May 2015.










 



Decision No 5/2014 of the EU-Central America Association Council of 7 November 2014 on the Geographical Indications to be included in Annex XVIII of the Agreement.

In accordance with the provisions of the Sole Article, Decision 5 of the Association Council enters into force on 5 August 2015.
Case C-406/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 24 July 2015 — Petya Milkova v Agentsia za privatizatsia i sledprivatizatsionen kontrol
Date: 2015-07-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: disabled person, dismissal, equal treatment, international convention, law of states, office worker, staff, worker with disabilities








C_2015337EN.01000701.xml










12.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 337/7





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 24 July 2015 — Petya Milkova v Agentsia za privatizatsia i sledprivatizatsionen kontrol
(Case C-406/15)
(2015/C 337/09)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven administrativen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Petya Milkova

Defendant: Agentsia za privatizatsia i sledprivatizatsionen control

Other party to the proceedings: Varhovna administrativna prokuratura

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 5(2) of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities permit the Member States to provide by law for specific advance protection against dismissal only for persons with disabilities who are employees, and not for civil servants with the same disabilities?










2.


Do Article 4 and the further provisions of Council Directive 2000/78/EC (1) of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation permit a national rule providing for specific protection against dismissal for persons with disabilities who are employees, but not for civil servants with the same disabilities?










3.


Does Article 7 of Directive 2000/78 permit persons with disabilities who are employees, but not civil servants with the same disabilities, to be afforded specific advance protection?










4.


If the first and third questions are answered in the negative: In light of the foregoing facts and circumstances of the present case, is it necessary in order to comply with the provisions of international and Community law that the specific advance protection against dismissal for persons with disabilities who are employees provided for by the national legislator also be applied to civil servants with the same disabilities?






(1)  OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16.
Case C-402/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 24 July 2015 — Adrien Kauffmann v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la recherche
Date: 2015-07-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Luxembourg, anti-discriminatory measure, education grant, family relationship, free movement of workers, frontier worker, higher education, maintenance obligation, student








C_2015302EN.01002801.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/28





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 24 July 2015 — Adrien Kauffmann v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la recherche
(Case C-402/15)
(2015/C 302/36)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour administrative

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Adrien Kauffmann

Respondent: Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la recherche

Questions referred

In order properly to meet the requirements of non-discrimination under Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 (1) on freedom of movement for workers within the Union, together with Article 45(2) TFEU, when taking into account the actual degree of attachment of a non-resident student, who has applied for financial aid for higher-education studies, with the society and with the labour market of Luxembourg, being the Member State in which a frontier worker has been employed or has carried out his activity in the conditions referred to in Article 2 bis of the Law of 22 June 2000 on State financial aid for higher-education studies, as added by the Law of 19 July 2013 in direct consequence of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 20 June 2013 (Case C-20/12) (2),






—


should the requirement that the student be the ‘child’ of that frontier worker be taken to mean that he must be the frontier worker’s ‘direct descendant in the first degree whose relationship with his parent is legally established’, with the emphasis being placed on the child-parent relationship established between the student and the frontier worker, which is supposed to underlie the abovementioned attachment, or










—


should the emphasis be placed on the fact that the frontier worker ‘continues to provide for the student’s maintenance’ without necessarily being connected to the student through a legal child-parent relationship, in particular where a sufficient link of communal life can be identified, of such a kind as to establish a connection between the frontier worker and one of the parents of the student with whom the child-parent relationship is legally established?










—


From the latter perspective, where the contribution — presumably, non-compulsory — of the frontier worker is not exclusive but made in parallel with that of the parent or parents connected with the student through a legal child-parent relationship, and therefore in principle under a legal duty to maintain the student, must that contribution satisfy certain criteria as regards its substance?






(1)  OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1.

(2)  EU:C:2013:411.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1311 of 24 July 2015 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Plate de Florenville (PGI)]
Date: 2015-07-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, Walloon region (Belgium), designation of origin, foodstuff, labelling, potato, product designation








L_2015203EN.01000101.xml










31.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 203/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1311
of 24 July 2015
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Plate de Florenville (PGI)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Belgium's application to register the name ‘Plate de Florenville’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Plate de Florenville’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Plate de Florenville’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 July 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 72, 28.2.2015, p. 26.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1312 of 24 July 2015 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Fesols de Santa Pau (PDO))
Date: 2015-07-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Catalonia, Spain, designation of origin, foodstuff, labelling, leguminous vegetable, product designation








L_2015203EN.01000301.xml










31.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 203/3








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1312
of 24 July 2015
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Fesols de Santa Pau (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Fesols de Santa Pau’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Fesols de Santa Pau’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Fesols de Santa Pau’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruits, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 July 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 82, 10.3.2015, p. 17.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-07-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015243EN.01000101.xml










24.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 243/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

23 July 2015
(2015/C 243/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0999




JPY


Japanese yen


136,15




DKK


Danish krone


7,4614




GBP


Pound sterling


0,70440




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4322




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0517




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,9630




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,039




HUF


Hungarian forint


309,60




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1229




RON


Romanian leu


4,4235




TRY


Turkish lira


2,9975




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4844




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4271




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5255




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6477




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5029




KRW


South Korean won


1 274,70




ZAR


South African rand


13,6702




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,8299




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5830




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 758,12




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1846




PHP


Philippine peso


49,873




RUB


Russian rouble


63,1740




THB


Thai baht


38,215




BRL


Brazilian real


3,5932




MXN


Mexican peso


17,6836




INR


Indian rupee


70,1379






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.