do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7668 — Harng Central Department Store/KS Premium Holding) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: catering industry, economic concentration, holding company, merger control, real estate business, retail trade








C_2015233EN.01000102.xml










17.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 233/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7668 — Harng Central Department Store/KS Premium Holding)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 233/02)
On 9 July 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7668. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Commission Directive 98/15/EC of 27 February 1998 amending Council Directive 91/271/EEC with respect to certain requirements established in Annex I thereof (OJ L 67, 7.3.1998)
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: directive (EU), urban area, wastewater, water treatment








L_2015189EN.01004101.xml










17.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 189/41







Corrigendum to Commission Directive 98/15/EC of 27 February 1998 amending Council Directive 91/271/EEC with respect to certain requirements established in Annex I thereof

(
Official Journal of the European Communities L 67 of 7 March 1998
)


On page 30, Annex, Table 2, in the title:
for:

               ‘Requirements for discharges from urban waste water treatment plants to sensitive areas which are subject to cutrophication as identified in Anex II.A(a).’,
read:

               ‘Requirements for discharges from urban waste water treatment plants to sensitive areas which are subject to eutrophication as identified in Annex II.A(a).’
Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2014/93/EU of 18 July 2014 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (OJ L 220, 25.7.2014)
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: International Maritime Organisation, carriage of passengers, maritime safety, maritime transport, prevention of pollution, safety standard








L_2015189EN.01004201.xml










17.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 189/42







Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2014/93/EU of 18 July 2014 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 220 of 25 July 2014
)


On page 44, point ‘4. Navigation equipment’, table, entry ‘A.1/4.34’:
for:











‘A.1/4.34


Radar equipment CAT 1








—


Reg. V/18.












—


Reg. V/19.










—


IMO Res. A.278(VIII),










—


IMO Res. A.694(17),












—


EN 60945 (2002) including IEC 60945 Corrigendum 1 (2008),






B + D
B + E
B + F
G’





read:











‘A.1/4.34


Radar equipment CAT 1








—


Reg. V/18.












—


Reg. V/19.










—


IMO Res. A.278(VIII),










—


IMO Res. A.694(17),










—


IMO Res. A.823(19),










—


IMO Res. MSC.191(79),










—


IMO Res. MSC.192(79),










—


ITU-R M. 1177-4(04/11).












—


EN 60945 (2002) including IEC 60945 Corrigendum 1 (2008),










—


EN 61162 Series,










—


EN 62288 (2008),










—


EN 62388 (2008).




Or,






—


IEC 60945 (2002) including IEC 60945 Corrigendum 1 (2008),










—


IEC 61162 Series,










—


IEC 62288 Ed.1.0(2008).










—


IEC 62388 Ed.1.0(2007).






B + D
B + E
B + F
G’
Case C-389/15: Action brought on 17 July 2015 — European Commission v Council of the European Union
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU competence, designation of origin, majority voting, negotiation of an agreement (EU), power to negotiate, product designation








C_2015311EN.01004201.xml










21.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/42





Action brought on 17 July 2015 — European Commission v Council of the European Union
(Case C-389/15)
(2015/C 311/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, J. Guillem Carrau, B. Hartmann, Agents)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

The applicant claims that the Court should:







—


annul the decision of the Council of 7 May 2015 authorising the opening of negotiations on a revised Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications as regards matters falling within the competence of the European Union;










—


maintain the effects of the contested decision, where appropriate, until the entry into force, within a reasonable period from the delivery of the present judgment, of a new decision that is to be adopted by the Council of the European Union pursuant to Article 218(3), (4) and (8) TFEU;










—


order the Council of the European Union to bear the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


First plea: The contested Decision acknowledges the existence of competence of the Member States, in breach of Article 3 TFEU, since the negotiation concerns an agreement which falls within the exclusive competence of the Union

Second plea: Infringement of Articles 207(3) and 218(3), (4) and (8) TFEU because the Council has appointed Member States as ‘negotiators’, in a matter of EU competence, and has not adopted the contested Decision in accordance with the applicable majority
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7643 — CNRC/Pirelli) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry, rubber industry








C_2015233EN.01000202.xml










17.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 233/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7643 — CNRC/Pirelli)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 233/04)
On 1 July 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7643. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Joined Cases C-512/14 P and C-513/14 P: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 17 July 2015 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Unibail Management
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, graphic illustration, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015320EN.01002602.xml










28.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/26





Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 17 July 2015 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Unibail Management
(Joined Cases C-512/14 P and C-513/14 P) (1)

(2015/C 320/39)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
Case T-391/15: Action brought on 17 July 2015 — Aldi v OHIM — Società Cooperativa Agricola Cantina Sociale Tollo (ALDIANO)
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wine








C_2015302EN.01006601.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/66





Action brought on 17 July 2015 — Aldi v OHIM — Società Cooperativa Agricola Cantina Sociale Tollo (ALDIANO)
(Case T-391/15)
(2015/C 302/82)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, C. Fürsen and N. Bertram, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Società Cooperativa Agricola Cantina Sociale Tollo (Tollo, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ALDIANO’ — Application No 10 942 274

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 May 2015 in Case R 1612/2014-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 1051/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 in order to provide for common rules on the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in exceptional circumstances (OJ L 295, 6.11.2013)
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: EU police cooperation, Schengen Agreement, border control, derogation from EU law, external border of the EU, internal border of the EU, threat to national security




L_2015191EN.01000801.xml










17.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 191/8







Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 1051/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 in order to provide for common rules on the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in exceptional circumstances

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 295 of 6 November 2013
)


On page 4, Article 1(1):
for:






‘(1)


in Title II, the following Chapter is added:

“CHAPTER IVa



Specific measures in the case of serious deficiencies relating to external border control



Article 19a
Measures at external borders and support by the Agency

1.   (…)’,






read:






‘(1)


in Title II, the following Chapter is added:

“CHAPTER IVa



Specific measures in the case of serious deficiencies relating to external border control



Article 19b
Measures at external borders and support by the Agency

1.   (…)’.
Case T-685/14: Order of the General Court of 17 July 2015 — EEB v Commission (Environment — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Commission decision concerning the notification by Bulgaria of a transitional national plan as referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions — Refusal of internal review — Measure of individual scope — Aarhus Convention — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Lateness — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any foundation in law)
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bulgaria, access to EU information, air quality, industrial pollution, national planning, pollution control








C_2015381EN.01003602.xml










16.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/36





Order of the General Court of 17 July 2015 — EEB v Commission
(Case T-685/14) (1)

((Environment - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Commission decision concerning the notification by Bulgaria of a transitional national plan as referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions - Refusal of internal review - Measure of individual scope - Aarhus Convention - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Lateness - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any foundation in law))
(2015/C 381/42)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Podskalská, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin, S. Petrova and G. Wilms, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2002 final of 31 March 2014 on the notification by the Republic of Bulgaria of a transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU, on industrial emissions, and, secondly, for annulment of the Commission Decision of 11 July 2014 (Ares (2014) 2317513) declaring inadmissible the applicant’s request that the Commission review its decision of 31 March 2014.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.










3.


European Environmental Bureau (EEB) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.










4.


EEB, the Commission, the Parliament and the Council shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.






(1)  OJ C 431, 1.12.2014.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7650 — Katara Hospitality/Starwood Hotel & Resorts Worldwide/Westin Excelsior Hotel) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, franchising, hotel industry, investment company, merger control








C_2015233EN.01000301.xml










17.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 233/3





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7650 — Katara Hospitality/Starwood Hotel & Resorts Worldwide/Westin Excelsior Hotel)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 233/05)
On 7 July 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7650. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-397/15: Action brought on 17 July 2015 — PAL-Bullermann v OHMI — Symaga (PAL)
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, fattening, poultry farming, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015302EN.01006801.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/68





Action brought on 17 July 2015 — PAL-Bullermann v OHMI — Symaga (PAL)
(Case T-397/15)
(2015/C 302/85)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: PAL-Bullermann GmbH (Friesoythe-Markhausen, Germany) (represented by: J. Eberhardt, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Symaga, SA (Villarta de San Juan, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark ‘PAL’— Community trade mark registration No 690 750

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 May 2015 in Case R 1626/2014-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


alter the contested decision so that the application for revocation is upheld in its entirety;










—


impose the costs to the defendant and the other party.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Rule 22(3)(4) of Regulation No 2868/95.
Case T-394/15: Action brought on 17 July 2015 — KPN v Commission
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Europe, Internet, Netherlands, economic concentration, merger control, telecommunications industry, telephone, television








C_2015302EN.01006701.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/67





Action brought on 17 July 2015 — KPN v Commission
(Case T-394/15)
(2015/C 302/83)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: KPN BV (Den Haag, Netherlands) (represented by: J. de Pree and C. van der Hoeven, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Commission decision C (2014) 7241 final of 10 October 2014 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA agreement (Case M.7000 — Liberty Global/Ziggo), and










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 2 and Article 8 of the Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) in that the Commission committed a manifest error in the assessment of the vertical effects of the concentration on the market for Premium Pay TV sports channels.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 296 TFEU in that the Commission failed to state its reasons for not assessing the possible vertical anti-competitive effects on the market for Premium Pay TV sports channels.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 2 and Article 8 of the Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 in that the Commission committed a manifest error of assessment in the Decision with respect to the role and influence of Mr Malone in other undertakings active on the same markets.






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (OJ 2004 L 24, p. 1).
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015233EN.01000401.xml










17.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 233/4





Euro exchange rates (1)

16 July 2015
(2015/C 233/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0867




JPY


Japanese yen


134,90




DKK


Danish krone


7,4617




GBP


Pound sterling


0,69810




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2787




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0407




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,8580




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,116




HUF


Hungarian forint


309,15




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1084




RON


Romanian leu


4,4274




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8840




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4713




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4070




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4229




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6674




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4854




KRW


South Korean won


1 248,24




ZAR


South African rand


13,4938




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,7496




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5915




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 548,21




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1311




PHP


Philippine peso


49,165




RUB


Russian rouble


61,9145




THB


Thai baht


37,187




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4219




MXN


Mexican peso


17,1981




INR


Indian rupee


69,0173






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/228 of 17 February 2015 replacing Annexes I to VII to Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations (OJ L 49, 20.2.2015)
Date: 2015-07-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Latvia, Lithuania, United Kingdom, application of EU law, enforcement of ruling, euro, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, maintenance obligation, participating country (euro area), private international law








L_2015189EN.01004202.xml










17.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 189/42







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/228 of 17 February 2015 replacing Annexes I to VII to Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 49 of 20 February 2015
)


On page 21, Annex III, point 2.2.2.3:
for:


                  ‘☐ Belgium ☐ Bulgaria ☐ Czech Republic ☐ Germany ☐ Estonia ☐ Ireland ☐ Greece ☐ Spain ☐ France ☐ Croatia ☐ Italy ☐ Cyprus ☐ Latvia ☐ Lithuania ☐ Luxembourg ☐ Hungary ☐ Malta ☐ Netherlands ☐ Austria ☐ Poland ☐ Portugal ☐ Romania ☐ Slovenia ☐ Finland ☐ Sweden’,

read:


                  ‘☐ Belgium ☐ Bulgaria ☐ Czech Republic ☐ Germany ☐ Estonia ☐ Ireland ☐ Greece ☐ Spain ☐ France ☐ Croatia ☐ Italy ☐ Cyprus ☐ Latvia ☐ Lithuania ☐ Luxembourg ☐ Hungary ☐ Malta ☐ Netherlands ☐ Austria ☐ Poland ☐ Portugal ☐ Romania ☐ Slovenia ☐ Slovakia ☐ Finland ☐ Sweden’.