do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 188, 18.7.2009)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: World Trade Organisation, countervailing charge, export subsidy, import policy, import restriction, third country








L_2015187EN.01009101.xml










15.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 187/91







Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 188 of 18 July 2009
)


On page 100, Article 9(2), second subparagraph:
for:

‘For the purpose of this paragraph, one producer shall be deemed to control another when the former is legally or operationally in a position to exercise restraint or direction over the latter.’,

read:

‘For the purpose of this paragraph, one shall be deemed to control another when the former is legally or operationally in a position to exercise restraint or direction over the latter.’.
Case T-215/13: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll v OHIM — Recticel (λ) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community figurative mark λ — Genuine use — Use as part of a composite mark — Proof of use — Articles 15 and 51(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building insulation, building materials, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015302EN.01004601.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/46





Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll v OHIM — Recticel (λ)
(Case T-215/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community figurative mark λ - Genuine use - Use as part of a composite mark - Proof of use - Articles 15 and 51(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 302/58)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG (Gladbeck, Germany) (represented by: J. Krenzel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially L. Rampini, and subsequently P. Bullock and N. Bambara, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Recticel SA (Brussels, Belgium)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 February 2013 (Case R 112/2012-5), relating to cancellation proceedings between Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG and Recticel SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.
Case T-333/13: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Westermann Lernspielverlag v OHIM — Diset (bambinoLÜK) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark bambinoLÜK — Earlier Community figurative mark BAMBINO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2015302EN.01004701.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/47





Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Westermann Lernspielverlag v OHIM — Diset (bambinoLÜK)
(Case T-333/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark bambinoLÜK - Earlier Community figurative mark BAMBINO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 302/60)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Westermann Lernspielverlag GmbH (Brunswick, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann and M. Maier, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Diset, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 April 2013 (Case R 1323/2012-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Diset, SA and Westermann Lernspielverlag GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Westermann Lernspielverlag GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
Case C-374/15 P: Appeal brought on 15 July 2015 by Harper Hygienics S.A. against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 13 May 2015 in Case T-363/12 Harper Hygienics v OHIM — Clinique Laboratories (CLEANIC natural beauty)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2016145EN.01001401.xml










25.4.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 145/14






Appeal brought on 15 July 2015 by Harper Hygienics S.A. against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 13 May 2015 in Case T-363/12 Harper Hygienics v OHIM — Clinique Laboratories (CLEANIC natural beauty)
(Case C-374/15 P)
(2016/C 145/17)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Appellant: Harper Hygienics S.A. (represented by: D. Rzążewska)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Clinique Laboratories, LLC
By order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 the appeal was dismissed in its entirety.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7656 — CD&R Group/Scimitar Topco Limited) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, fuel, holding company, investment company, merger control








C_2015231EN.01000102.xml










15.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 231/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7656 — CD&R Group/Scimitar Topco Limited)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 231/02)
On 6 July 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7656. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-323/12: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Knauf Insulation Technology v OHIM — Saint Gobain Cristalería (ECOSE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark ECOSE — Earlier national word mark ECOSEC FACHADAS — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building insulation, building materials, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015302EN.01004101.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/41





Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Knauf Insulation Technology v OHIM — Saint Gobain Cristalería (ECOSE)
(Case T-323/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark ECOSE - Earlier national word mark ECOSEC FACHADAS - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 302/52)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Knauf Insulation Technology (Visé, Belgium) (represented by: K. Manhaeve, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Saint Gobain Cristalería, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by M. Montañá, S. Sebé and I. Carulla, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 April 2012 (Case R 259/2011-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Saint Gobain Cristalería, SL and Knauf Insulation Technologies.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Knauf Insulation Technology to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.
Case T-45/10: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — GEA Group v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price fixing, market allocation and exchange of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Attribution of the infringement — Shareholding presumption — Duration and proof of the infringement — Limitation period — Duration of the administrative procedure — Reasonable time — Rights of the defence)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrative procedure, cartel, chemical industry, competition policy, fine, infringement of EU law, limitation of legal proceedings, restriction on competition, rights of the defence








C_2015302EN.01003001.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/30





Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — GEA Group v Commission
(Case T-45/10) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for ESBO/esters heat stabilisers - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Price fixing, market allocation and exchange of commercially sensitive information - Fines - Attribution of the infringement - Shareholding presumption - Duration and proof of the infringement - Limitation period - Duration of the administrative procedure - Reasonable time - Rights of the defence))
(2015/C 302/38)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: GEA Group AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Kallmayer, I. du Mont, G. Schiffers and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Sauer and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents, and W. Berg, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 8682 final of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C38.589 — Heat stabilisers), or, in the alternative, a reduction in the fine imposed.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders GEA Group AG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.
Case T-24/13: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Cactus v OHIM — Del Rio Rodríguez (CACTUS OF PEACE CACTUS DE LA PAZ) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark CACTUS OF PEACE CACTUS DE LA PAZ — Earlier Community word mark CACTUS and earlier figurative mark Cactus — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 76(1) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, means of agricultural production, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015302EN.01004401.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/44





Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Cactus v OHIM — Del Rio Rodríguez (CACTUS OF PEACE CACTUS DE LA PAZ)
(Case T-24/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark CACTUS OF PEACE CACTUS DE LA PAZ - Earlier Community word mark CACTUS and earlier figurative mark Cactus - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 76(1) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 302/56)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Cactus SA (Bertrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: K. Manhaeve, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Isabel Del Rio Rodríguez (Malaga, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 October 2012 (Case R 2005/2011-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Cactus SA and Isabel Del Rio Rodríguez.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls point 1 of the operative part of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 19 October 2012 (Case R 2005/2011-2) in so far as it rejected the opposition on the grounds that ‘retailing of natural plants and flowers, grains; fresh fruits and vegetables’ services in Class 35 were not covered by the earlier marks;










2.


Annuls point 2 of the operative part of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 October 2012 referred to above in so far as it annulled the part of the decision of the Opposition Division allowing the opposition based on ‘natural plants and flowers, grains’ in Class 31, and point 1 of the operative part of that decision, which rejected the opposition based on those goods;










3.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










4.


Orders Cactus SA to pay one third of the costs incurred by the parties before the General Court and orders OHIM to pay two thirds of those costs.






(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.
Case T-462/12: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Pilkington Group v Commission (Competition — Administrative procedure — European automotive glass market — Publication of a decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Rejection of a request for confidential treatment of data allegedly covered by business secrecy — Obligation to state reasons — Confidentiality — Obligation of professional secrecy — Legitimate expectations)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, administrative procedure, competition policy, confidentiality, glass industry, industrial secret, motor vehicle industry








C_2015302EN.01004202.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/42





Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Pilkington Group v Commission
(Case T-462/12) (1)

((Competition - Administrative procedure - European automotive glass market - Publication of a decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Rejection of a request for confidential treatment of data allegedly covered by business secrecy - Obligation to state reasons - Confidentiality - Obligation of professional secrecy - Legitimate expectations))
(2015/C 302/54)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Pilkington Group Ltd (St Helens, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Scott, S. Wisking, K. Fountoukakos-Kyriakakos, Solicitors, and C. Puech Baron, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Kellerbauer, P. Van Nuffel and G. Meessen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 5718 final of 6 August 2012 rejecting a request for confidential treatment submitted by Pilkington Group Ltd under Article 8 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (Case COMP/39.125 — Car glass).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Decision C(2012) 5718 final of 6 August 2012 rejecting a request for confidential treatment submitted by Pilkington Group Ltd under Article 8 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (Case COMP/39.125 — Car glass), in so far as it relates to the request by Pilkington Group concerning recital 115 of Decision C(2008) 6815 final of 12 November 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders Pilkington Group to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.
Case T-352/14: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — The Smiley Company v OHIM — The Swatch Group Management Services (HAPPY TIME) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark HAPPY TIME — Earlier international word mark HAPPY HOURS — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015302EN.01005102.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/51





Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — The Smiley Company v OHIM — The Swatch Group Management Services (HAPPY TIME)
(Case T-352/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark HAPPY TIME - Earlier international word mark HAPPY HOURS - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 302/66)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: The Smiley Company SPRL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: I.-M. Helbig, P. Hansmersmann and S. Rengshausen, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: The Swatch Group Management Services AG (Biel, Switzerland)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 February 2014 (Case R 1497/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between The Swatch Group Management Services AG and The Smiley Company SPRL.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders The Smiley Company SPRL to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.
Case T-337/13: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — CSF v Commission (Approximation of the laws — Directive 2006/42/EC — Machinery bearing the ‘EC’ marking — Essential safety requirements — Risks to the safety of persons — Safeguard clause — Commission decision declaring a national measure prohibiting the placing on the market to be justified — Conditions governing the implementation of the safeguard clause — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: approximation of laws, equal treatment, machinery, market approval, product designation, product safety, protective clause








C_2015302EN.01004801.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/48





Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — CSF v Commission
(Case T-337/13) (1)

((Approximation of the laws - Directive 2006/42/EC - Machinery bearing the ‘EC’ marking - Essential safety requirements - Risks to the safety of persons - Safeguard clause - Commission decision declaring a national measure prohibiting the placing on the market to be justified - Conditions governing the implementation of the safeguard clause - Manifest error of assessment - Equal treatment))
(2015/C 302/61)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: CSF Srl (Grumolo delle Abbadesse, Italy) (represented by: R. Santoro, S. Armellini and R. Bugaro, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Zavvos, acting as Agent, and M. Pappalardo, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: initially V. Pasternak Jørgensen and M. Wolff, then M. Wolff, C. Thorning, U. Melgaard and N. Lyshøj, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2013/173/EU of 8 April 2013 on a measure taken by Denmark according to Article 11 of Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council prohibiting a type of multi-purpose earthmoving machinery (OJ 2013 L 101, p. 29).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders CSF Srl to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission in the context of the present action and the proceedings for interim relief;










3.


Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 233, 10.8.2013.
Case T-398/13: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — TVR Automotive v OHIM — TVR Italia (TVR ITALIA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark TVR ITALIA — Earlier national and Community word marks TVR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Revocation proceedings — Genuine use of the earlier trade mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-07-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015302EN.01004802.xml










14.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 302/48





Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — TVR Automotive v OHIM — TVR Italia (TVR ITALIA)
(Case T-398/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark TVR ITALIA - Earlier national and Community word marks TVR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Revocation proceedings - Genuine use of the earlier trade mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 302/62)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: TVR Automotive Ltd (Whiteley, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by G. Schneider and S. Hanne, and subsequently by J. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: TVR Italia Srl (Canosa, Italy) (represented by: F. Caricato, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 May 2013 (Case R 823/2011-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Muadib Beteiligung GmbH and TVR Italia Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 14 May 2013 (Case R 823/2011-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Muadib Beteiligung GmbH and TVR Italia Srl;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders OHIM and TVR Italia Srl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.