do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7606 — Grupo Antolín/Magna Interiors) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-07-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry, vehicle parts








C_2015223EN.01000601.xml










8.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 223/6





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7606 — Grupo Antolín/Magna Interiors)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 223/07)






1.


On 30 June 2015, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Grupo Antolín-Irausa SA (‘Grupo Antolín’, Spain) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over identified businesses of Magna Interiors (‘Magna Interiors’), a wholly-owned operating unit of Magna International, Inc. (Canada), by way of a combined purchase of assets and shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Grupo Antolín: the global manufacturing and supply of automotive interior components, including overhead systems and components, doors, seats, lighting and trims,
—   for Magna Interiors: the global manufacturing and supply of automotive interior components, including overhead systems and components, sidewall and trim systems, cargo management systems and cockpit systems.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7606 — Grupo Antolín/Magna Interiors, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7648 — eBook.de/Hugendubel/JV) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-07-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: bookshop, economic concentration, electronic commerce, electronics industry, merger control, toy industry








C_2015223EN.01000201.xml










8.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 223/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7648 — eBook.de/Hugendubel/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 223/03)
On 22 June 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7648. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-3/15: Order of the President of the Court of 8 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Alexandra Stück v Swiss International Air Lines AG
Date: 2015-07-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Switzerland, agreement (EU), airline, carriage of passengers, carrier, civil aviation, consumer protection, indemnification, interpretation of the law, traveller








C_2015398EN.01002402.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/24





Order of the President of the Court of 8 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Alexandra Stück v Swiss International Air Lines AG
(Case C-3/15) (1)

(2015/C 398/33)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1122 of 8 July 2015 establishing a prohibition of fishing for sandeel in Union waters of sandeel management area 1 by vessels flying the flag of Denmark
Date: 2015-07-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, EU waters, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2015184EN.01000101.xml










11.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 184/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2015/1122
of 8 July 2015
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for sandeel in Union waters of sandeel management area 1 by vessels flying the flag of Denmark


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) 2015/104 (2) lays down quotas for 2015.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2015.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2015 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 July 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) 2015/104 of 19 January 2015 fixing for 2015 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters, amending Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 779/2014 (OJ L 22, 28.1.2015, p. 1).




ANNEX






No


05/TQ104




Member State


Denmark




Stock


SAN/234_1




Species


Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.)




Zone


Union waters of sandeel management area 1




Closing date


21.5.2015
Case C-342/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 8 July 2015 — Leopoldine Gertraud Piringer
Date: 2015-07-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, Czechia, freedom to provide services, land register, lawyer, mutual recognition principle, notary, right of establishment, transfer of property








C_2015354EN.01001102.xml










26.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/11





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 8 July 2015 — Leopoldine Gertraud Piringer
(Case C-342/15)
(2015/C 354/14)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant: Leopoldine Gertraud Piringer

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 1(1), second sentence, of Council Directive 77/249/EEC (1) of 22 March 1977 to facilitate the effective exercise by lawyers of freedom to provide services to be interpreted as enabling a Member State to exclude certification of the authenticity of signatures on instruments which are necessary for the creation or transfer of rights to property from the freedom to provide services by lawyers and to reserve the provision of this service to public notaries?










2.


Is Article 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as not precluding a national provision of the State of registry (Austria) under which certification of the authenticity of signatures on instruments which are necessary for the creation or transfer of rights to property is reserved to public notaries, with the effect that a declaration of the authenticity of a signature by a lawyer established in the Czech Republic made in his State of establishment is not recognised in the State of registry, despite this declaration being accorded the legal effect of an official certification under Czech law,
in particular because,






a.


the question of the recognition of a declaration of the authenticity of a signature on a request for entry in the land register of the State of registry made in the Czech Republic by a lawyer established there relates to the provision of a service by a lawyer the content of which is not possible for lawyers established in the State of registry, and the refusal to recognise it is therefore not subject to the prohibition of restrictions on recognition




or






b.


such a reservation is justified to ensure the legality and legal certainty of acts (instruments relating to legal transactions) and as a consequence is required for reasons of public interest and is also necessary to achieve this objective in the State of registry?










(1)  Council Directive 77/249/EEC of 22 March 1977 to facilitate the effective exercise by lawyers of freedom to provide services (OJ 1977 L 78, p. 17).
Case T-536/11: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2015 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v Commission (Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of computing services for the development and maintenance of software, consultancy and assistance for different types of IT applications — Ranking of a tenderer’s bid in the cascade for different lots and ranking of the bids of other tenderers — Obligation to state reasons — Award criterion — Manifest error of assessment — Non-contractual liability)
Date: 2015-07-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Publications Office of the European Union, computer applications, indemnification, provision of services, public contract, software








C_2015279EN.01003001.xml










24.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/30






Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2015 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v Commission
(Case T-536/11) (1)

((Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of computing services for the development and maintenance of software, consultancy and assistance for different types of IT applications - Ranking of a tenderer’s bid in the cascade for different lots and ranking of the bids of other tenderers - Obligation to state reasons - Award criterion - Manifest error of assessment - Non-contractual liability))
(2015/C 279/36)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Ettelbrück, Luxembourg); European Dynamics Belgium SA (Brussels, Belgium); and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, M. Dermitzakis and N. Theologou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially by S. Delaude and V. Savov, and subsequently by S. Delaude, acting as Agents, and by O. Graber-Soudry, Solicitor)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Publications Office of the European Union of 22 July 2011 to rank the applicants, in respect of the bids they submitted in response to the call for tenders AO 10340, concerning the provision of computing services for the development and maintenance of software, consultancy and assistance for different types of IT applications (OJ 2011/S 66-106099), in the third place in the cascade for lot 1, in the third place in the cascade for lot 4 and in the second place in the cascade for lot 3, as well as the decisions awarding the contracts at issue to other tenderers in as much as they refer to their ranking, and, second, for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, European Dynamics Belgium SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1123 of 8 July 2015 establishing a prohibition of fishing for sandeel in Union waters of sandeel management area 6 by vessels flying the flag of Denmark
Date: 2015-07-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, EU waters, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, fishing vessel, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2015184EN.01000301.xml










11.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 184/3








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2015/1123
of 8 July 2015
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for sandeel in Union waters of sandeel management area 6 by vessels flying the flag of Denmark


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) 2015/104 (2), lays down quotas for 2015.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2015.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2015 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 July 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) 2015/104 of 19 January 2015 fixing for 2015 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters, amending Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 779/2014 (OJ L 22, 28.1.2015, p. 1).




ANNEX






No


06/TQ104




Member State


Denmark




Stock


SAN/234_6




Species


Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.)




Zone


Union waters of sandeel management area 6




Closing date


6.6.2015
European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 July 2015 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (06682/2014 — C8-0098/2014 — 2014/0039(NLE))
Date: 2015-07-08
Institutions: Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Committee on Fisheries, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: Croatia, Serbia, accession to the European Union, consent procedure, protocol to an agreement, ratification of an agreement, stabilisation and association agreement








C_2017265EN.01017401.xml










11.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 265/174





P8_TA(2015)0254
Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Serbia (protocol to take account of the accession of Croatia) ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 July 2015 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (06682/2014 — C8-0098/2014 — 2014/0039(NLE))
(Consent)
(2017/C 265/32)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (06682/2014),










—


having regard to the draft Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (06681/2014),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 217, Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(i), and Article 218(8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0098/2014),










—


having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A8-0189/2015),












1.


Gives its consent to conclusion of the Protocol;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Serbia.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 July 2015 on the draft Council decision concerning the renewal of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of India (05872/2015 — C8-0074/2015 — 2014/0293(NLE))
Date: 2015-07-08
Institutions: Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, European Parliament
Subjects: India, consent procedure, cooperation agreement (EU), renewal of an agreement, scientific cooperation, technical cooperation








C_2017265EN.01017501.xml










11.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 265/175





P8_TA(2015)0255
Scientific and technological cooperation with India: renewal of the agreement ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 July 2015 on the draft Council decision concerning the renewal of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of India (05872/2015 — C8-0074/2015 — 2014/0293(NLE))
(Consent)
(2017/C 265/33)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision concerning the renewal of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of India (05872/2015),










—


having regard to Council Decision 2002/648/EC of 25 June 2002 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of India (1),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 186 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0074/2015),










—


having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), Rule 108(7) and Rule 50(1) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A8-0179/2015),












1.


Gives its consent to renewal of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of India.






(1)  OJ L 213, 9.8.2002, p. 29.
Case T-548/12: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2015 — Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll v OHIM — Redrock Construction (REDROCK) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark REDROCK — Earlier national word marks ROCK, KEPROCK, FLEXIROCK, FORMROCK, FLOOR-ROCK, TERMAROCK, KLIMAROCK, SPEEDROCK, DUROCK, SPLITROCK, PLANAROCK, TOPROCK, KLEMMROCK, FIXROCK, SONOROCK PLUS, VARIROCK, SONOROCK and MASTERROCK — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-07-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building materials, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015279EN.01003101.xml










24.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/31






Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2015 — Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll v OHIM — Redrock Construction (REDROCK)
(Case T-548/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark REDROCK - Earlier national word marks ROCK, KEPROCK, FLEXIROCK, FORMROCK, FLOOR-ROCK, TERMAROCK, KLIMAROCK, SPEEDROCK, DUROCK, SPLITROCK, PLANAROCK, TOPROCK, KLEMMROCK, FIXROCK, SONOROCK PLUS, VARIROCK, SONOROCK and MASTERROCK - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 279/38)
Language of the case: Czech

Parties


Applicant: Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG (Gladbeck, Germany) (represented by: J. Krenzel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Mahelka, P. Geroulakos and M. Rajh, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Redrock Construction s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: D. Krofta, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 October 2012 (Case R 1596/2011-4), concerning invalidity proceedings between Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG and Redrock Construction s.r.o.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.