do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-345/15 P: Appeal brought on 7 July 2015 by Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 28 April 2015 in Case T-169/12: Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) v Council of the European Union
Date: 2015-07-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Russia, anti-dumping measure, ferro-alloy, import (EU), originating product, semi-metal








C_2015311EN.01003301.xml










21.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/33





Appeal brought on 7 July 2015 by Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 28 April 2015 in Case T-169/12: Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) v Council of the European Union
(Case C-345/15 P)
(2015/C 311/38)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK), Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) (represented by: B. Evtimov, lawyer, D. O'Keeffe, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Commission, Euroalliages

Form of order sought

The appellants claim that the Court should:






—


Set aside the Judgment of the General Court;










—


Give a final judgment on the matter where the stage of the procedure so permits;










—


In the alternative, refer the case for reconsideration to the General Court;










—


Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs;










—


Order the interveners to bear their own costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellants submit that the General Court infringed EU law in its appraisal of the appellants’ pleas in law in its judgment as follows:






—


In their first plea in law on appeal, the appellants contend that the General Court erred in its interpretation of Article 11(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (1) (‘the Basic Anti-dumping Regulation’) and erred in its legal appraisal when it rejected the plea at first instance that Article 11(9) of the Basic Anti-dumping Regulation and its reference to Article 2 of the Basic Anti-dumping Regulation require the institutions to calculate a dumping margin in all interim reviews of dumping, thereby also infringing the legal principles of good administration, transparency and legal certainty;










—


In their second plea in law on appeal, the appellants contend that the General Court erred in its interpretation of the reasoning of the General Court in its judgment in Case T-143/06 MTZ Polyfilms v Council of the European Union.






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community OJ L 343, p. 51.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 740/2014 of 8 July 2014 implementing Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ L 200, 9.7.2014)
Date: 2015-07-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belarus, economic sanctions, international sanctions








L_2015176EN.01004001.xml










7.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 176/40







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 740/2014 of 8 July 2014 implementing Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 200 of 9 July 2014
)


On page 2, Annex, point II, sole entry (as corrected by corrigendum published in OJ L 328, 13.11.2014, p. 60):
for:










 


‘Name


Name
(Belarussian spelling)


Name
(Russian Spelling)


Reasons




233.


Volkov, Vitaliy Nikolayevich


Волкаў, Віталь Мiкалаевiч


Волков, Виталий Николаевич


Judge at the regional court in Shklov. In January 2012 he decided to transfer former Presidential candidate and opposition activist N. Statkevich to a closed-type prison in Mogilov on the mere basis of alleged violations of the rules of imprisonment in Shklov penal colony IK-17. This decision has thus led to breaches of N. Statkevich's human rights including sleep deprivation and threatening his health.’





read:











 


‘Names
Transcription of Belarusian spelling
Transcription of Russian spelling


Names
(Belarusian spelling)


Names
(Russian spelling)


Identifying Information


Reasons for listing




233.


Volkau, Vital Mikalayevich
Volkov, Vitaliy Nikolayevich


Волкаў, Віталь Мiкалаевiч


Волков, Виталий Николаевич


 


Judge at the regional court in Shklov. In January 2012 he decided to transfer former Presidential candidate and opposition activist N. Statkevich to a closed-type prison in Mogilov on the mere basis of alleged violations of the rules of imprisonment in Shklov penal colony IK-17. This decision has thus led to breaches of N. Statkevich's human rights including sleep deprivation and threatening his health.’
Case T-521/13: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2015 — Alpinestars Research v OHIM — Tung Cho and Wang Yu (A ASTER) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark A ASTER — Earlier Community word mark A-STARS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, sports equipment, textile industry, trade-mark law, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2015279EN.01003302.xml










24.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/33






Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2015 — Alpinestars Research v OHIM — Tung Cho and Wang Yu (A ASTER)
(Case T-521/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark A ASTER - Earlier Community word mark A-STARS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 279/41)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Alpinestars Research Srl (Coste di Maser, Italy) (represented by: G. Dragotti, R. Valenti and S. Balice, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Kean Tung Cho (Taichung City, Taiwan) and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu (Wuci Township, Taiwan)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 July 2013 (Case R 2309/2012-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Alpinestars Research Srl, on the one hand, and Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu, on the other hand.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 15 July 2013 (Case R 2309/2012-4);










2.


Orders OHIM to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.
Case T-677/13: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2015 — Axa Versicherung v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a procedure pursuant to the competition rules — Request relating to a collection of documents — Refusal to grant access — Request relating to a single document — Table of contents — Obligation to undertake a concrete, individual examination — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — Overriding public interest — Claim for damages — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2015-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, competition law, glass, motor vehicle industry, protection of privacy, provision of documents








C_2015279EN.01003401.xml










24.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/34






Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2015 — Axa Versicherung v Commission
(Case T-677/13) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a procedure pursuant to the competition rules - Request relating to a collection of documents - Refusal to grant access - Request relating to a single document - Table of contents - Obligation to undertake a concrete, individual examination - Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Overriding public interest - Claim for damages - Obligation to state reasons))
(2015/C 279/42)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Axa Versicherung AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Bahr, S. Dethof and A. Malec, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and H. Krämer, acting as Agents, and by R. Van der Hout and A. Köhler, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Saint-Gobain Sekurit Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG (Aix-la-Chapelle, Germany) (represented by: B. Meyring and E. Venot, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2012/817 and 2012/3021 Gestdem of 29 October 2013, rejecting two requests for access to documents in the file of Case COMP/39.125 (Car glass).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Decision 2012/817 and 2012/3021 Gestdem of 29 October 2013, rejecting two requests for access to documents in the file of Case COMP/39.125 (Car glass) in so far as it refuses to grant Axa Versicherung AG access to the ‘leniency documents’ included in the table of contents of that file;










2.


Dismisses the remainder of the action;










3.


Orders Axa Versicherung and the European Commission to each bear their own costs;










4.


Orders Saint-Gobain Sekurit Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.
European Parliament decision of 7 July 2015 on the nomination of Bettina Michelle Jakobsen as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0122/2015 — 2015/0803(NLE))
Date: 2015-07-07
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: European Court of Auditors, appointment of members








C_2017265EN.01015801.xml










11.8.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 265/158





P8_TA(2015)0239
Nomination of a Member of the Court of Auditors — Bettina Michelle Jakobsen
European Parliament decision of 7 July 2015 on the nomination of Bettina Michelle Jakobsen as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0122/2015 — 2015/0803(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2017/C 265/22)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0122/2015),










—


having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0198/2015),










A.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










B.


whereas at its meeting of 17 June 2015 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Bettina Michelle Jakobsen as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-07-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015222EN.01000301.xml










7.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

6 July 2015
(2015/C 222/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1008




JPY


Japanese yen


135,11




DKK


Danish krone


7,4610




GBP


Pound sterling


0,70800




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3699




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0422




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,9095




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,135




HUF


Hungarian forint


316,13




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2005




RON


Romanian leu


4,4863




TRY


Turkish lira


2,9622




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4688




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3914




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5338




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6440




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4876




KRW


South Korean won


1 241,95




ZAR


South African rand


13,6731




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,8337




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5750




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 700,08




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2018




PHP


Philippine peso


49,651




RUB


Russian rouble


62,1340




THB


Thai baht


37,257




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4659




MXN


Mexican peso


17,4537




INR


Indian rupee


69,8398






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-293/15: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2015 — Banimmo v Commission (Public service contracts — Withdrawal of the contested measure — No need to adjudicate on the action)
Date: 2015-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: equal treatment, public contract, right to justice, transparency in decision-making








C_2015320EN.01003002.xml










28.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/30





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2015 — Banimmo v Commission
(Case T-293/15) (1)

((Public service contracts - Withdrawal of the contested measure - No need to adjudicate on the action))
(2015/C 320/47)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Banimmo SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: V. Ost and M. Vanderstraeten, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 9 April 2015 by which the Commission rejected the offer which Banimmo had submitted following a property prospecting notice to meet the office space requirements of the Commission in Brussels (OJ 2014/S 130-231896).

Operative part of the order







1)


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2)


There is no longer any need to rule on Banimmo’s application that the present action be adjudicated under an expedited procedure.










3)


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Banimmo, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures.






(1)  OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/1129 of 7 July 2015 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (EUPOL COPPS/2/2015)
Date: 2015-07-07
Institutions: Political and Security Committee
Subjects: EU police mission, Palestine, appointment of members








L_2015184EN.01001701.xml










11.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 184/17








            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/1129
of 7 July 2015
         
extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (EUPOL COPPS/2/2015)


THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision 2013/354/CFSP of 3 July 2013 on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (1), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Decision 2013/354/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.












(2)


On 17 February 2015, the PSC adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/381 (2), appointing Mr Rodolphe MAUGET as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS from 16 February 2015 to 30 June 2015.












(3)


On 2 July 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1064 (3), extending the mandate of EUPOL COPPS from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016.












(4)


The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the extension of the mandate of Mr Rodolphe MAUGET as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The mandate of Mr Rodolphe MAUGET as Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) is hereby extended until 30 June 2016.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall apply from 1 July 2015.




Done at Brussels, 7 July 2015.


For the Political and Security Committee


The Chairperson

W. STEVENS
            





(1)  
            OJ L 185, 4.7.2013, p. 12.

(2)  Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/381 of 17 February 2015 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (EUPOL COPPS/1/2015) (OJ L 64, 7.3.2015, p. 37).

(3)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1064 of 2 July 2015 amending Decision 2013/354/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (OJ L 174, 3.7.2015, p. 21).
Case T-769/14: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2015 — CGI Luxembourg and Intrasoft International v Parliament (Action for annulment and for damages — Public service contracts — Development and maintenance of production information systems — Ranking of a tenderer in the cascade procedure — Annulment of the contested decisions — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrative transparency, award of contract, damages, information technology industry, information technology profession, invitation to tender








C_2015320EN.01002901.xml










28.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/29





Order of the General Court of 7 July 2015 — CGI Luxembourg and Intrasoft International v Parliament
(Case T-769/14) (1)

((Action for annulment and for damages - Public service contracts - Development and maintenance of production information systems - Ranking of a tenderer in the cascade procedure - Annulment of the contested decisions - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 320/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: CGI Luxembourg SA (Bertrange, Luxembourg); and Intrasoft International SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: B. Simon and L. Darie, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for, first, annulment of the Parliament’s decisions to rank the applicants’ tender second in the cascade for the purposes of awarding the contract in respect of Lot 3, ‘Development and maintenance of production information systems’, in the open call for tenders PE/ITEC/ITS14, ‘External Provision of IT Services’, and to award the first cascading contract in that tendering procedure to another consortium and, secondly, the award of damages.

Operative part of the order







1)


There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.










2)


The parties shall bear their own costs, including those incurred in connection with the interim proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.
Case C-244/14: Order of the President of the Court of 7 July 2015 — European Commission v Republic of Austria
Date: 2015-07-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Community certification, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, rail transport, safety standard, transport safety








C_2015320EN.01002501.xml










28.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/25





Order of the President of the Court of 7 July 2015 — European Commission v Republic of Austria
(Case C-244/14) (1)

(2015/C 320/34)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2014/439/CFSP of 8 July 2014 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ L 200, 9.7.2014)
Date: 2015-07-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belarus, economic sanctions, international sanctions, removal








L_2015176EN.01004101.xml










7.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 176/41







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2014/439/CFSP of 8 July 2014 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 200 of 9 July 2014
)


On page 14, Annex, point II, sole entry (as corrected by corrigendum published in OJ L 328, 13.11.2014, p. 61).
for:










 


Name


Name
(Belarusian spelling)


Name
(Russian Spelling)


Reasons




‘233.


Volkov, Vitaliy Nikolayevich


Волкаў, Віталь Мiкалаевiч


Волков, Виталий Николаевич


Judge at the regional court in Shklov. In January 2012 he decided to transfer former Presidential candidate and opposition activist N. Statkevich to a closed-type prison in Mogilov on the mere basis of alleged violations of the rules of imprisonment in Shklov penal colony IK-17. This decision has thus led to breaches of N. Statkevich's human rights including sleep deprivation and threatening his health.’





read:











 


Names
Transcription of Belarusian spelling
Transcription of Russian spelling


Names
(Belarusian spelling)


Names
(Russian Spelling)


Identifying Information


Reasons for listing




‘233.


Volkau, Vital Mikalayevich
Volkov, Vitaliy Nikolayevich


Волкаў, Віталь Мiкалаевiч


Волков, Виталий Николаевич


 


Judge at the regional court in Shklov. In January 2012 he decided to transfer former Presidential candidate and opposition activist N. Statkevich to a closed-type prison in Mogilov on the mere basis of alleged violations of the rules of imprisonment in Shklov penal colony IK-17. This decision has thus led to breaches of N. Statkevich's human rights including sleep deprivation and threatening his health.’