do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU — Suspension of the deadline — Request made by a Contracting Entity
Date: 2015-07-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Austria, airport, award of contract, market access








C_2015217EN.01002301.xml










2.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 217/23





Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU — Suspension of the deadline
Request made by a Contracting Entity
(2015/C 217/09)
On 16 January 2015 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 19 January 2015.
This request is made by Flughafen Wien and concerns activities relating to the exploitation of a geographical area for the purposes of provision of airports or other terminal facilities to carriers by air on the territory of Austria. The relevant notice was published in the OJ C 93 of 20 March 2015, page 22.
Pursuant to Annex IV, paragraph 1, point b of Directive 2014/25/EU, the Commission is allowed a period of 130 working days to take a decision on this request. This initial period expires on 30 July 2015.
Pursuant to Annex IV, point 2 of Directive 2014/25/EU, the Commission may require the Member State or the applicant or the independent national authority competent or any other competent national authority to provide all necessary information or to supplement or clarify information given within the appropriate time limit. On 27 February 2015 the Commission asked Flughafen Wien to provide additional information by 13 March 2015. On 20 April 2015 the Commission asked the Austrian authorities to provide additional information by 18 May 2015.
Pursuant to Annex IV, point 2, second phrase of Directive 2014/25/EU in case of late or incomplete answers to the Commission’s request for clarification or for the additional information, the period of 130 days as set out above, shall be suspended for the period between the expiry of the time limit set in the request for information and the receipt of the complete and correct information.
The final deadline will therefore expire after 90 working days after the receipt of complete and correct information.


(1)  OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.
Case C-334/14: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons (Belgium)) — The Belgian State v Nathalie De Fruytier (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Sixth VAT Directive — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Article 13(A)(1)(b) and (c) — Hospital and medical care — Closely related activities — Activity of transporting human organs and samples of human origin for the purposes of medical analysis or medical or therapeutic care — Self-employed activity — Hospitals, centres for medical treatment and diagnosis — Establishment of a similar nature)
Date: 2015-07-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, basis of tax assessment, health care, medical institution, provision of services, self-employment, services of general interest, tax exemption








C_2015294EN.01001401.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/14






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons (Belgium)) — The Belgian State v Nathalie De Fruytier
(Case C-334/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Sixth VAT Directive - Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest - Article 13(A)(1)(b) and (c) - Hospital and medical care - Closely related activities - Activity of transporting human organs and samples of human origin for the purposes of medical analysis or medical or therapeutic care - Self-employed activity - Hospitals, centres for medical treatment and diagnosis - Establishment of a similar nature))
(2015/C 294/18)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Mons

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: The Belgian State

Defendant: Nathalie De Fruytier

Operative part of the judgment

Neither Article 13(A)(1)(b) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, nor Article 13(A)(1)(c) thereof, can be interpreted as applying to the transportation, for clinics and laboratories, of human organs and samples of human origin for the purposes of medical analysis or medical or therapeutic care, by a third party who is self-employed and whose services are covered by the reimbursement made by the social security system. In particular, such an activity does not qualify for an exemption from value added tax as an activity closely related to services of a medical nature as provided for in Article 13(A)(1)(b), since that self-employed third party cannot be characterised as a ‘body governed by public law’ or fall within the definition of a ‘hospital’, a ‘centre for medical treatment’ or a centre for ‘diagnosis’ or any ‘other duly recognised establishment of a similar nature’, operating under social conditions comparable to those applicable to bodies governed by public law.


(1)  
            OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1151 of 2 July 2015 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (De Meerlander (PGI))
Date: 2015-07-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, North Holland, designation of origin, labelling, potato, product designation








L_2015187EN.01000401.xml










15.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 187/4








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1151
of 2 July 2015
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (De Meerlander (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Netherlands' application to register the name ‘De Meerlander’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘De Meerlander’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘De Meerlander’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. — Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 2 July 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 70, 27.2.2015, p. 16.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).