do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Method of designation of the Judge replacing a Judge prevented from acting
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: General Court (EU), appointment of members, judge, president of an institution, rules of procedure








C_2015213EN.01000201.xml










29.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/2





Method of designation of the Judge replacing a Judge prevented from acting
(2015/C 213/02)
On 13 May 2015, the General Court, considering the forthcoming entry into force on 1 July 2015 of the Rules of Procedure of 4 March 2015, decided that, with effect from 1 July 2015, where a Judge is prevented from acting in the circumstances referred to in Article 17(2) and Article 24(2) respectively of the Rules of Procedure, the President of the General Court is to designate the Judge replacing the Judge prevented from acting following the order laid down in Article 8 of the Rules of Procedure, with the exception of the Vice-President and the Presidents of Chambers. However, in order to ensure an even spread of the workload, the President of the General Court may derogate from that order.
Having regard to any urgency and to special circumstances, the President of the General Court may designate himself to replace the Judge who is prevented from acting.
Case F-64/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 June 2015 — Campanella v Commission
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, admission to examinations, competition (EU), translation








C_2015262EN.01004402.xml










10.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/44





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 June 2015 — Campanella v Commission
(Case F-64/14) (1)

(2015/C 262/61)
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014, p. 31.
Composition of the Grand Chamber
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: General Court (EU), appointment of members, judge, president of an institution, vice-president of an institution








C_2015213EN.01000202.xml










29.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/2





Composition of the Grand Chamber
(2015/C 213/03)
On 13 May 2015, the General Court, considering the forthcoming entry into force on 1 July 2015 of the Rules of Procedure of 4 March 2015, decided that, for the period from 1 July 2015 to 31 August 2016, in accordance with Article 15(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the fifteen Judges of which the Grand Chamber is composed are to be the President of the General Court, the Vice-President, the eight Presidents of Chambers, the two Judges sitting in the formation of three Judges initially seised of the case, the two Judges who would additionally have had to sit in the case in question if it had been assigned to a Chamber of five Judges, and another Judge. The latter is to be designated according to the order laid down in Article 8 of the Rules of Procedure.
Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union








C_2015213EN.01000101.xml










29.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/1





Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 213/01)

Last publication


OJ C 205, 22.6.2015


Past publications


OJ C 198, 15.6.2015


OJ C 190, 8.6.2015


OJ C 178, 1.6.2015


OJ C 171, 26.5.2015


OJ C 155, 11.5.2015


OJ C 146, 4.5.2015

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
Case C-319/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Paris (France) lodged on 29 June 2015 — Overseas Financial Limited, Oaktree Finance Limited v Ministre de l’économie, de l'industrie et du numérique
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Iran, claim, damages, economic sanctions, enforcement of ruling, international sanctions, ownership, right to justice








C_2015279EN.01002501.xml










24.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/25






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Paris (France) lodged on 29 June 2015 — Overseas Financial Limited, Oaktree Finance Limited v Ministre de l’économie, de l'industrie et du numérique
(Case C-319/15)
(2015/C 279/31)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour administrative d'appel de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Overseas Financial Limited, Oaktree Finance Limited

Defendant: Ministre de l'économie, de l'industrie et du numérique

Question referred

Do the provisions of Article 17 of Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010
             (1) infringe Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the first article of the first additional protocol to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which protect the right to property, read together with Article 47 of that Charter and the first paragraph of Article 6 of the Convention, which guarantee the implementation of a judicial decision within a reasonable period of time, particularly to the extent that those provisions do not provide for the release of frozen funds where a third person relies on a right to payment of debt acquired by virtue of a judicial decision ordering a person designated in a freezing measure to pay an indemnity to him, given at the end of proceedings commenced before that designation, and that those two persons have no relationship, even indirect, connected to the activities covered by the regulation?


(1)  Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1).
Case T-212/14: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — PSL v OHIM — Consortium Ménager Parisien (Representation of a watch)
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015311EN.01006102.xml










21.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/61





Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — PSL v OHIM — Consortium Ménager Parisien (Representation of a watch)
(Case T-212/14) (1)

(2015/C 311/68)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.
Case C-322/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 29 June 2015 — Google Ireland Limited, Google Italy Srl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: accounting, competition law, freedom to provide services, provision of services, restriction on competition, telecommunications








C_2015320EN.01001501.xml










28.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/15





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 29 June 2015 — Google Ireland Limited, Google Italy Srl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni
(Case C-322/15)
(2015/C 320/21)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Google Ireland Limited, Google Italy Srl

Defendant: Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni

Question referred

Does Article 56 TFEU preclude application of contested Resolution No 397/13/CONS of the Autorità di garanzia delle Telecomunicazioni, and of the related provisions of national law, as interpreted along the lines proposed by that authority, which require the submission of complex ‘economic system information’ (which must be drawn up in accordance with Italian accounting standards) on the economic activities carried out in relation to Italian consumers, motivated by objectives of protecting competition but necessarily connected to the various and more limited institutional functions of that authority of safeguarding pluralism within the sector concerned, to operators which none the less do not come within the scope of the national legislation governing that sector (the Testo Unico dei Servizi di Media Audiovisivi e Radiofonici), and in particular, in the case under review here, to a national operator carrying out only services for its fellow subsidiary governed by Irish law and also, as regards the latter, to an operator not having its headquarters and not carrying on any business using employees within national territory; alternatively, does this constitute a measure restricting freedom to provide services within the European Union in breach of Article 56 TFEU?
Case T-337/15: Action brought on 29 June 2015 — Bach Flower Remedies v OHIM — Durapharma (RESCUE)
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, agricultural product, beverage, cosmetic product, foodstuff, pharmaceutical product, processed food product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015294EN.01007801.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/78






Action brought on 29 June 2015 — Bach Flower Remedies v OHIM — Durapharma (RESCUE)
(Case T-337/15)
(2015/C 294/93)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Bach Flower Remedies Ltd (Wimbledon, United Kingdom) (represented by: I. Fowler, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Durapharma ApS (Stenstrup, Denmark)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘RESCUE’ — Community trade mark registration No 6 473 755

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 March 2015 in Case R 2551/2013-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant, and in case the other party before the Board of Appeal joins the proceedings, the intervener.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Articles 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case F-62/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 June 2015 — Chezzi v Commission
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, admission to examinations, competition (EU), translation








C_2015262EN.01004401.xml










10.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/44





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 June 2015 — Chezzi v Commission
(Case F-62/14) (1)

(2015/C 262/60)
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014, p. 31.
Case T-73/13: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — InterMune UK and Others v EMA
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to information, industrial secret, pharmaceutical product








C_2015311EN.01006002.xml










21.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/60





Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — InterMune UK and Others v EMA
(Case T-73/13) (1)

(2015/C 311/66)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.
Revocation of the decision of 23 September 2013 designating the Judge replacing the President of the General Court as the Judge hearing applications for interim measures
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: General Court (EU), appointment of members, judge, president of an institution








C_2015213EN.01000203.xml










29.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/2





Revocation of the decision of 23 September 2013 designating the Judge replacing the President of the General Court as the Judge hearing applications for interim measures
(2015/C 213/04)
On 13 May 2015, the General Court, considering the forthcoming entry into force on 1 July 2015 of the Rules of Procedure of 4 March 2015, decided, in the light of Article 157(4) of those Rules, to revoke with effect from 1 July 2015 the decision of 23 September 2013 designating Judge Forwood to replace the President of the General Court for the purpose of deciding applications for interim measures where the latter is absent or prevented from dealing with them, for the period from 23 September 2013 to 31 August 2016 (OJ 2013 C 313, p. 5).
Case T-19/13: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — Frank Bold v Commission (Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Decision granting the Czech Republic an option for transitional free allocation for the modernisation of electricity generation — Request for internal review of that decision — Lack of measure of individual scope — Commission decision declaring the request for a review inadmissible — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Czechia, EU Emissions Trading Scheme, EU emission allowance, greenhouse gas, modernisation of industry, pollution control measures, power plant, tradeable emission permit








C_2015311EN.01004401.xml










21.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/44





Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — Frank Bold v Commission
(Case T-19/13) (1)

((Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Decision granting the Czech Republic an option for transitional free allocation for the modernisation of electricity generation - Request for internal review of that decision - Lack of measure of individual scope - Commission decision declaring the request for a review inadmissible - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2015/C 311/47)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Frank Bold Society, formerly Ekologický právní servis (Brno, Czech Republic) (represented by: P. Černý, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: P. Oliver and L. Pignataro-Nolin, and subsequently by: L. Pignataro-Nolin and J. Tomkin, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, T. Müller and D. Hadroušek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of (i) Commission Decision C(2012) 8382 final of 12 November 2012 rejecting as inadmissible the request for internal review of Commission decision C(2012) 4576 final of 6 July 2012 granting the Czech Republic an option for transitional free allocation for the modernisation of electricity generation, and (ii) the latter decision.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Frank Bold Society is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.










3.


The Czech Republic shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
Case C-321/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Luxembourg) lodged on 29 June 2015 — ArcelorMittal Rodange et Schifflange SA v State of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Emissions Trading Scheme, EU emission allowance, greenhouse gas, reduction of gas emissions, tradeable emission permit








C_2015294EN.01003902.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/39






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Luxembourg) lodged on 29 June 2015 — ArcelorMittal Rodange et Schifflange SA v State of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg
(Case C-321/15)
(2015/C 294/51)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour constitutionnelle

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ArcelorMittal Rodange et Schifflange SA

Defendant: State of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Question referred

Is Article 13(6) of the amended Law of 23 December 2004 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading, in so far as it allows the competent minister to order the surrender, without full or partial compensation of allowances issued in accordance with Article 12(2) and (4) of that law, but not used, compatible with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (1), and more particularly with the broad logic of the emissions trading scheme provided for by that directive, that question encompassing the issue of the legal validity of the surrender of allowances which have been issued but not used, and, if that question is answered in the affirmative, of their classification, as well as that of the possible classification of such allowances as property?


(1)  
            OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32.
Case T-815/14: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — Closet Clothing v OHIM — Closed Holding (CLOSET)
Date: 2015-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2015311EN.01006201.xml










21.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/62





Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — Closet Clothing v OHIM — Closed Holding (CLOSET)
(Case T-815/14) (1)

(2015/C 311/71)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.