do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Decision adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2015 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund for Romania, Bulgaria and Italy
Date: 2015-06-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Bulgaria, EU aid, Italy, Romania, amending budget, budgetary expenditure, budgetary resources, draft budget (EU), financial aid








C_2015207EN.01000501.xml










24.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 207/5





COUNCIL DECISION
adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2015 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund for Romania, Bulgaria and Italy
(2015/C 207/05)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,
Whereas:














HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Sole Article
The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2015 was adopted on 19 June 2015.
The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Luxembourg, on 19 June 2015.


For the Council


The President

J. REIRS




(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 69, 13.3.2015, p. 1.
Case T-358/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2015 — Italy v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Public storage of sugar — Increase in costs in connection with warehousing rental — Annual inventory of stocks — Physical inspections of storage areas — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons — Risk of financial damage to the funds — Effectiveness)
Date: 2015-06-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAGGF Guarantee Section, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, storage cost, storage of food, sugar








C_2015262EN.01001302.xml










10.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/13





Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2015 — Italy v Commission
(Case T-358/11) (1)

((EAGGF - Guarantee Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Public storage of sugar - Increase in costs in connection with warehousing rental - Annual inventory of stocks - Physical inspections of storage areas - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons - Risk of financial damage to the funds - Effectiveness))
(2015/C 262/17)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and P. Marchini, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2011/244/EU of 15 April 2011 of excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2011 L 102, p. 33), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic, and of the Commission’s letters of 3 February 2010 and 3 January 2011 as acts preparatory to that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.
Case C-300/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administratif (Luxembourg) lodged on 19 June 2015 — Charles Kohll, Sylvie Kohll-Schlesser v Director of the Administration des Contributions Directes
Date: 2015-06-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: free movement of workers, tax on income, tax relief








C_2015294EN.01003402.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/34






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administratif (Luxembourg) lodged on 19 June 2015 — Charles Kohll, Sylvie Kohll-Schlesser v Director of the Administration des Contributions Directes
(Case C-300/15)
(2015/C 294/43)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal Administratif

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Charles Kohll, Sylvie Kohll-Schlesser

Defendant: Director of the Administration des Contributions Directes

Question referred

Does the principle of freedom of movement for workers, as enshrined in particular in Article 45 TFEU, preclude the provisions of Article 139ter(1) of the Law of 4 December 1967 on income tax, as amended, in so far as they restrict eligibility for the tax credit established there to persons in possession of a tax deduction form?
Case C-136/15 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2015 — Mohammad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Article 169(2) — Content required in the application initiating an appeal — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2015-06-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Syria, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2015398EN.01001101.xml










30.11.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/11





Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2015 — Mohammad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union
(Case C-136/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 169(2) - Content required in the application initiating an appeal - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2015/C 398/13)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Mohammad Makhlouf (represented by: G. Karouni, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and M.-M. Joséphidès, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Mr Mohammad Makhlouf shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.






(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.