do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-296/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil (Slovenia) lodged on 18 June 2015 — Medisanus d.o.o. v Splošna Bolnišnica Murska Sobota
Date: 2015-06-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, Slovenia, application of EU law, award of contract, equal treatment, freedom to provide services, medicinal product, pharmaceutical legislation, right of establishment








C_2015346EN.01000201.xml










19.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/2





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil (Slovenia) lodged on 18 June 2015 — Medisanus d.o.o. v Splošna Bolnišnica Murska Sobota
(Case C-296/15)
(2015/C 346/02)
Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Medisanus d.o.o.

Defendant: Splošna Bolnišnica Murska Sobota

Question referred







1)


Must Directive 2004/18/EC (1), in particular Article 23(2), Article 23(8) and Article 2 thereof, read in conjunction with






—


Directive 2001/83/EC (2), in particular Article 83 thereof,










—


Directive 2002/98/EC (3), in particular Article 4(2) thereof,










—


the TFEU, in particular Article 18 thereof,








be interpreted as precluding a specification that industrially manufactured medicinal products must be ‘obtained from Slovenian plasma’, (a specification based on the domestic legislation of the Republic of Slovenia, namely Article 6(71) of the ZZdr-2)?


(1)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114).

(2)  Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001 L 311, p. 67).

(3)  Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 setting standards of quality and safety for the collection, testing, processing, storage and distribution of human blood and blood components and amending Directive 2001/83/EC (OJ 2003 L 33, p. 30).
Case C-535/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — Vadzim Ipatau v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Republic of Belarus — Admissibility — Time-limit for bringing proceedings — Legal aid — Suspensory effect — Effective judicial protection — Rights of the defence — Principle of proportionality)
Date: 2015-06-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belarus, common foreign and security policy, international sanctions, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2015279EN.01001701.xml










24.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/17






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — Vadzim Ipatau v Council of the European Union
(Case C-535/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against the Republic of Belarus - Admissibility - Time-limit for bringing proceedings - Legal aid - Suspensory effect - Effective judicial protection - Rights of the defence - Principle of proportionality))
(2015/C 279/20)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Vadzim Ipatau (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Vadzim Ipatau to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.






(1)  
            OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.
Case F-27/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — CX v Commission (Civil Service — Disciplinary procedure — Respective roles and powers of the Disciplinary Board and the Appointing Authority — Disciplinary penalty — Reduction in grade followed by a decision on promotion — Proportionality of the penalty)
Date: 2015-06-18
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, damages, disciplinary proceedings, pay scale, promotion








C_2015245EN.01004701.xml










27.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/47





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — CX v Commission
(Case F-27/13) (1)

((Civil Service - Disciplinary procedure - Respective roles and powers of the Disciplinary Board and the Appointing Authority - Disciplinary penalty - Reduction in grade followed by a decision on promotion - Proportionality of the penalty))
(2015/C 245/57)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CX (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decisions to reduce the applicant to grade AD 8 under Article 9(1)(f) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations and a claim for damages for the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders CX to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 56.
Case C-297/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sø- og Handelsretten (Denmark) lodged on 18 June 2015 — Ferring Lægemidler A/S, acting on behalf of Ferring B.V. v Orifarm A/S
Date: 2015-06-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, import, launching of a product, medicinal product, packaged product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015294EN.01003401.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/34






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sø- og Handelsretten (Denmark) lodged on 18 June 2015 — Ferring Lægemidler A/S, acting on behalf of Ferring B.V. v Orifarm A/S
(Case C-297/15)
(2015/C 294/42)
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Sø- og Handelsretten

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ferring Lægemidler A/S, acting on behalf of Ferring B.V.

Defendant: Orifarm A/S

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 7(2) of Directive 2008/95/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and the related case-law be interpreted as meaning that a trade mark proprietor may lawfully object to the continued marketing of a medicinal product by a parallel importer, where the importer has repackaged the medicinal product in a new, outer packaging and reaffixed the trade mark in a situation where the trade mark proprietor has marketed the medicinal product in the same volume and packet sizes in all EEA countries where the medicinal product is sold?










2.


Will the answer to the first question be different if the trade mark proprietor in both the country of export and the country of import has marketed the medicinal product in two different packet sizes (10-piece packets and 1-piece packets) and the importer has purchased 10-piece packets in the country of export and repackaged them in 1-piece packets, on which the trade mark has been reaffixed before the products are marketed in the country of import?






(1)  
            OJ 2008 L 299, p. 25.
Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 July 2015 (Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))
Date: 2015-06-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, State aid, interest, reimbursement of aid








C_2015201EN.01000301.xml










18.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 201/3





Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 July 2015
(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))
(2015/C 201/03)
Base rates calculated in accordance with the communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basis points has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate.
Modified rates are indicated in bold.
Previous table published in OJ C 174, 28.5.2015, p. 7.


































From


To


AT


BE


BG


CY


CZ


DE


DK


EE


EL


ES


FI


FR


HR


HU


IE


IT


LT


LU


LV


MT


NL


PL


PT


RO


SE


SI


SK


UK




1.7.2015


…


0,22


0,22



1,85



0,22


0,52


0,22



0,24



0,22


0,22


0,22


0,22


0,22


1,58



1,80



0,22


0,22


0,22


0,22


0,22


0,22


0,22


1,76


0,22


1,67


- 0,07



0,22


0,22


1,02




1.6.2015


30.6.2015



0,22




0,22



2,18



0,22



0,52



0,22




0,17




0,22




0,22




0,22




0,22




0,22



1,58


2,21



0,22




0,22




0,22




0,22




0,22




0,22




0,22




1,76




0,22




1,67




0,00




0,22




0,22



1,02




1.5.2015


31.5.2015



0,26




0,26



2,18



0,26



0,52



0,26




0,27




0,26




0,26




0,26




0,26




0,26



1,58


2,21



0,26




0,26




0,26




0,26




0,26




0,26




0,26



2,16



0,26



2,04



0,13




0,26




0,26



1,02




1.4.2015


30.4.2015


0,34


0,34


2,18


0,34


0,52


0,34



0,42



0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


1,58


2,21


0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


2,16


0,34


2,04



0,23



0,34


0,34


1,02




1.3.2015


31.3.2015


0,34


0,34


2,18


0,34


0,52


0,34


0,66


0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


1,58


2,21


0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


0,34


2,16


0,34



2,04




0,33



0,34


0,34


1,02




1.1.2015


28.2.2015



0,34




0,34




2,18




0,34




0,52




0,34




0,66




0,34




0,34




0,34




0,34




0,34




1,58




2,21




0,34




0,34




0,34




0,34




0,34




0,34




0,34




2,16




0,34




2,63




0,46




0,34




0,34




1,02
Notice of open competitions
Date: 2015-06-18
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, artistic profession, assistant, competition (EU)








C_2015201EN.01000401.xml










18.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 201/4





NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS
(2015/C 201/04)
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:






 


EPSO/AD/310/15






1.


Curator (AD 7)










2.


Museum educator (AD 7)










3.


Conservator – conservation and collection manager (AD 7)














 


EPSO/AST/136/15






1.


Assistant curator (AST 3)










2.


Conservation and collection management assistant (AST 3)








The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 201 A of 18 June 2015
.
Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-06-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015201EN.01000201.xml










18.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 201/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

17 June 2015
(2015/C 201/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1279




JPY


Japanese yen


139,78




DKK


Danish krone


7,4575




GBP


Pound sterling


0,71700




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2185




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0451




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,7245




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,240




HUF


Hungarian forint


311,84




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1576




RON


Romanian leu


4,4860




TRY


Turkish lira


3,0860




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4694




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3887




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7445




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6284




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5189




KRW


South Korean won


1 263,34




ZAR


South African rand


14,0226




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,0010




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5820




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 051,87




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2356




PHP


Philippine peso


50,962




RUB


Russian rouble


61,0345




THB


Thai baht


38,015




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4952




MXN


Mexican peso


17,3843




INR


Indian rupee


72,3435






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-508/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — Republic of Estonia v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Directive 2013/34/EU — Obligations on some forms of undertakings in relation to financial statements — Principles of subsidiarity and proportionality — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2015-06-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative formalities, closing of accounts, national implementing measure, principle of proportionality, principle of subsidiarity, publication, type of business








C_2015279EN.01000601.xml










24.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/6






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — Republic of Estonia v European Parliament, Council of the European Union
(Case C-508/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Directive 2013/34/EU - Obligations on some forms of undertakings in relation to financial statements - Principles of subsidiarity and proportionality - Obligation to state reasons))
(2015/C 279/06)
Language of the case: Estonian

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Estonia (represented by: K. Kraavi-Käerdi, Agent)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: U. Rösslein and M. Allik, Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: P. Mahnič Bruni and A. Stolfot, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendants: European Commission (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and L. Naaber-Kivisoo, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Republic of Estonia to pay the costs;










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Case T-317/15: Action brought on 18 June 2015 — Italy v Commission
Date: 2015-06-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, candidate, competition (EU), linguistic discrimination, official language, principle of proportionality








C_2015254EN.01002101.xml










3.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 254/21





Action brought on 18 June 2015 — Italy v Commission
(Case T-317/15)
(2015/C 254/24)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato, and G. Palmieri, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the notice of competition EPSO/AD/302/15 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of Audit;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are those raised in Case T-17/15 Italian Republic v Commission (OJ 2015 C 81, p. 27).
Case C-9/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v D.G. Kieback (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for workers — Tax legislation — Income tax — Income received in a Member State — Non-resident worker — Tax in the State of employment — Conditions)
Date: 2015-06-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: free movement of workers, frontier worker, personal income tax, tax law, tax relief, taxable income, third country








C_2015279EN.01001101.xml










24.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/11






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v D.G. Kieback
(Case C-9/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for workers - Tax legislation - Income tax - Income received in a Member State - Non-resident worker - Tax in the State of employment - Conditions))
(2015/C 279/12)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant: D.G. Kieback

Operative part of the judgment

Article 39(2) EC must be interpreted as not precluding a Member State, for the purposes of charging income tax on a non-resident worker who has pursued his occupational activity in that Member State during part of the year, from refusing to grant that worker a tax advantage which takes account of his personal and family circumstances, on the basis that, although he received, in that Member State, all or almost all his income from that period, that income does not form the major part of his taxable income for the entire year in question. The fact that that worker left to pursue his occupational activity in a non-member State and not in another EU Member State does not affect that interpretation.


(1)  
            OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.
Case F-5/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — CX v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Disciplinary penalty — Removal from post — Failure by the Appointing Authority to hear the official concerned — Failure to uphold the right to be heard)
Date: 2015-06-18
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, damages, disciplinary proceedings, pension scheme, right to justice, staff regulations (EU), termination of employment








C_2015245EN.01004702.xml










27.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/47





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — CX v Commission
(Case F-5/14) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Disciplinary penalty - Removal from post - Failure by the Appointing Authority to hear the official concerned - Failure to uphold the right to be heard))
(2015/C 245/58)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CX (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the Commission’s decision to remove the applicant from his post under Article 9(1)(h) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations without reducing his pension entitlement following an internal investigation begun following an investigation by OLAF opened against an undertaking, and a claim for damages and interest for the non-material and material harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decision of 16 October 2013 by which the European Commission imposed the penalty of removal from his post on CX without reducing his pension entitlement;










2.


Dismisses the remainder of the action;










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by CX, including those of the interim proceedings in Case F-5/14 R.






(1)  OJ C 85, 22.3.2014, p. 27.