do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-178/14: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Friedrich Wilhelms-Hütte Eisenguss v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, energy production, renewable energy








C_2015294EN.01005501.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/55






Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Friedrich Wilhelms-Hütte Eisenguss v Commission
(Case T-178/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 294/66)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Friedrich Wilhelms-Hütte Eisenguss GmbH (Mülheim-an-der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by C. Renner, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: EFTA Surveillance Authority (represented by: initially X. Lewis, M. Schneider and J. Kaasin, then X. Lewis, M. Schneider, M. Moustakali and C. Perrin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for intervention submitted by Flachglas Torgau GmbH and Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG, by Kronotex GmbH & Co. KG and Kronoply GmbH, by Bayer MaterialScience AG, by Sabic Polyolefine GmbH, by Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH, Ineos Phenol GmbH and Ineos Vinyls Deutschland GmbH, and by Advansa GmbH, Akzo Nobel Industrial Chemicals GmbH, Aurubis AG, CBW Chemie GmbH, CFB Chemische Fabrik Brunsbüttel GmbH & Co. KG, Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH, Dralon GmbH, Hahl Filaments GmbH, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Siegen, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Salzgitter, Nabaltec AG, Siltronic AG and Wacker Chemie AG.










3.


Friedrich Wilhelms-Hütte Eisenguss GmbH shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.










4.


The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Yemen apply
Date: 2015-06-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Yemen, data processing, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2015191EN.01000301.xml










9.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/3





Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Yemen apply
(2015/C 191/02)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 (2).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 365, 19.12.2014, p. 60.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
Case T-230/14: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Deutsche Edelstahlwerke v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, energy production, renewable energy








C_2015294EN.01005702.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/57






Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Deutsche Edelstahlwerke v Commission
(Case T-230/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 294/69)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Deutsche Edelstahlwerke GmbH (Witten, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and H. Janssen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.










3.


Deutsche Edelstahlwerke GmbH shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.










4.


The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Corrigendum to Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters (OJ L 130, 1.5.2014)
Date: 2015-06-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, judicial inquiry, mutual recognition principle, proof, ruling








L_2015143EN.01001601.xml










9.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 143/16







Corrigendum to Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 130 of 1 May 2014
)


On page 6, Article 1(1), second line:
for:

               ‘… (“OGthe issuing State”) …’,
read:

               ‘… (“the issuing State”) …’;
on page 24, Annex A, Section C, second line:
the figure ‘1.’ is deleted.
Case T-280/14: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland and Others v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, energy production, renewable energy








C_2015294EN.01006401.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/64






Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland and Others v Commission
(Case T-280/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 294/78)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH (Cologne, Germany); Ineos Phenol GmbH (Gladbeck, Germany); and Ineos Vinyls Deutschland GmbH (Wilhelmshaven, Germany) (represented by: C. Arhold, L. Petersen, F.-A. Wesche, N. Wimmer and T. Woltering, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by C. von Donat and G. Quardt, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.










3.


Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH, Ineos Phenol GmbH and Ineos Vinyls Deutschland GmbH shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.










4.


The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
European Parliament : art exhibitions
Date: 2015-06-09
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: European Parliament, cultural event

The European Parliament is committed to development. 
See how: Art Exhibitions, europarl.europa.eu

P
h
o
t
o
f
r
o
m
A
r
i

V
i
t
i

i

k
a
n
e
n

:

K
h
a
u
c
h

i

P
a
p
a

,

a
s
p
e
c
i

a

l

m
e
a

l

i

i

l

n
t
h
e
h
g
h
a
n
d
s
o
f
L
a
o
s
.

w
w
w

.
f
a
m

i
l
y
m
e
a

l
.

e
u
Case T-318/14: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Vinnolit v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, energy production, renewable energy








C_2015294EN.01006701.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/67






Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Vinnolit v Commission
(Case T-318/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 294/82)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Vinnolit GmbH & Co. KG (Ismaning, Germany) (represented by: M. Geipel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by H. Wollmann, lawyer)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.










3.


Vinnolit GmbH & Co. KG shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.










4.


The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Case F-65/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 June 2015 — EF v EEAS (Civil service — Member of staff of the EEAS — Officials — 2013 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 — Applicant’s objection to the list of officials proposed for promotion — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Completion of a minimum of 2 years in the grade — Calculation of the two-year period — Date of the promotion decision)
Date: 2015-06-09
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: administrator, pay scale, promotion, staff regulations (EU)








C_2015245EN.01004801.xml










27.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/48





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 June 2015 — EF v EEAS
(Case F-65/14) (1)

((Civil service - Member of staff of the EEAS - Officials - 2013 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 - Applicant’s objection to the list of officials proposed for promotion - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Completion of a minimum of 2 years in the grade - Calculation of the two-year period - Date of the promotion decision))
(2015/C 245/59)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: EF (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decisions refusing to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 under the 2013 promotion procedure even though he was included on the list of official eligible for promotion.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Declares that EF is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European External Action Service.






(1)  OJ C 380, 27/10/2014, p. 26.
Case T-282/14: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Bayer MaterialScience v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, energy production, renewable energy








C_2015294EN.01006601.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/66






Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Bayer MaterialScience v Commission
(Case T-282/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 294/80)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Bayer MaterialScience AG (Leverkusen, Germany) (represented by: C. Arhold, L. Petersen, F.-A. Wesche, N. Wimmer and T. Woltering, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by C. von Donat and G. Quardt, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.










3.


Bayer MaterialScience AG shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.










4.


The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Case T-179/14: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Schmiedewerke Gröditz v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, energy production, renewable energy








C_2015294EN.01005601.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/56






Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Schmiedewerke Gröditz v Commission
(Case T-179/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 294/67)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Schmiedewerke Gröditz GmbH (Gröditz, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by C. Renner, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: EFTA Surveillance Authority (represented by: initially X. Lewis, M. Schneider and G. Mathisen, then X. Lewis, M. Schneider, M. Moustakali and C. Perrin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for intervention submitted by Flachglas Torgau GmbH and Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG, by Kronotex GmbH & Co. KG and Kronoply GmbH, by Bayer MaterialScience AG, by Sabic Polyolefine GmbH, by Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH, Ineos Phenol GmbH and Ineos Vinyls Deutschland GmbH, and by Advansa GmbH, Akzo Nobel Industrial Chemicals GmbH, Aurubis AG, CBW Chemie GmbH, CFB Chemische Fabrik Brunsbüttel GmbH & Co. KG, Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH, Dralon GmbH, Hahl Filaments GmbH, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Siegen, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Salzgitter, Nabaltec AG, Siltronic AG and Wacker Chemie AG.










3.


Schmiedewerke Gröditz GmbH shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.










4.


The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-06-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015191EN.01000701.xml










9.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/7





Euro exchange rates (1)

8 June 2015
(2015/C 191/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1162




JPY


Japanese yen


139,84




DKK


Danish krone


7,4602




GBP


Pound sterling


0,73180




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3678




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0470




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,8270




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,431




HUF


Hungarian forint


313,95




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1551




RON


Romanian leu


4,4650




TRY


Turkish lira


3,0865




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4615




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3879




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6536




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5776




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5165




KRW


South Korean won


1 252,08




ZAR


South African rand


14,0463




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9278




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5530




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 900,68




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2075




PHP


Philippine peso


50,465




RUB


Russian rouble


62,3147




THB


Thai baht


37,694




BRL


Brazilian real


3,5023




MXN


Mexican peso


17,4998




INR


Indian rupee


71,5360






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.