do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice of open competitions
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: Belgium, EPSO, Italy, Luxembourg, administrator, competition (EU), physician








C_2015183EN.01000501.xml










4.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 183/5





NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS
(2015/C 183/06)
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:






 


Doctors (AD 11)










 


EPSO/AD/308/15 — Brussels site










 


EPSO/AD/309/15 — Luxembourg and Ispra sites




The competition notice is published in 24 languages in 
Official Journal of the European Union C 183 A of 4 June 2015.
Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7643 — CNRC/Pirelli) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry, rubber industry








C_2015183EN.01001101.xml










4.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 183/11





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7643 — CNRC/Pirelli)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 183/12)






1.


On 27 May 2015, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking China National Tyre and Rubber Company Ltd (China), wholly owned by China National Chemical Corporation, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Pirelli & C SpA (Italy) by way of purchase of securities.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for China National Tyre and Rubber Company Ltd: manufacture and distribution of original equipment manufacturer tyres replacement tyres for both heavy and consumers vehicles; manufacture of other rubber and related products,
—   for Pirelli & C SpA: production and distribution of original equipment manufacturer tyres and replacement tyres for both heavy and consumer vehicles.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7643 — CNRC/Pirelli, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Corrigendum to the publication pursuant to Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (Recast) of decisions taken by Member States to grant, suspend or revoke operating licences (OJ C 154, 9.5.2015)
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, air transport, carriage of goods, carriage of passengers, service concession, transport licence








C_2015183EN.01001201.xml










4.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 183/12





Corrigendum to the publication pursuant to Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (Recast) of decisions taken by Member States to grant, suspend or revoke operating licences
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 154 of 9 May 2015
)
(2015/C 183/13)
On page 23, in the table entitled ‘Change of address of the licence holder’, insert the following row below ‘Spain’:












‘Spain



Iberia, Líneas Aéreas de España, S.A. Operadora


c. Velázquez, 130 – 28006 Madrid


Martínez Villergas, 49 – 28027 Madrid


Passengers, cargo, mail


A


10.2.2014’





on page 24, delete the following row from the table entitled ‘Change of category’:











‘Spain



Iberia, Líneas Aéreas de España, S.A. Operadora


c. Velázquez, 130 - 28006 Madrid


passengers, cargo, mail


from A to B


10.2.2014’
Corrigendum to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC (OJ L 10, 14.1.2006)
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: avian influenza, health control, poultry, trade restriction, vaccination, veterinary inspection








L_2015137EN.01001301.xml










4.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 137/13







Corrigendum to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 10 of 14 January 2006
)


On page 47, Annex I, paragraph 2(b):
for:







‘(b)


avian influenza viruses with an intravenous pathogenicity index in six-week old chickens greater than 1.2;2;’




,read:







‘(b)


avian influenza viruses with an intravenous pathogenicity index in six-week old chickens greater than 1.2;’




,on page 59, Annex IX, paragraph 5(c)(ii):
for:







‘(ii)


originate from hatching eggs satisfying the conditions set out in point (a) of paragraph 2, point (a) of paragraph 3 or point (a) of paragraph 4;’




,read:







‘(ii)


originate from hatching eggs satisfying the conditions set out in point (a) of paragraph 3;’




.
Case C-15/14 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — European Commission v MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. (Appeals — State aid — Agreement between Hungary and the oil and gas company MOL relating to mining fees in connection with the extraction of hydrocarbons — Subsequent amendment to the statutory rules increasing the rate of the fees — Increase in fees not applied to MOL — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Selective nature)
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, common market, competition, hydrocarbon, mining operation, tax








C_2015236EN.01001401.xml










20.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 236/14





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — European Commission v MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt.
(Case C-15/14 P) (1)

((Appeals - State aid - Agreement between Hungary and the oil and gas company MOL relating to mining fees in connection with the extraction of hydrocarbons - Subsequent amendment to the statutory rules increasing the rate of the fees - Increase in fees not applied to MOL - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Selective nature))
(2015/C 236/18)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and K. Talabér-Ritz, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. (represented by: N. Niejahr, Rechtsanwältin, and F. Carlin, Barrister)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.
Case C-682/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — Andechser Molkerei Scheitz GmbH v European Commission (Appeals — Public health — List of food additives approved for use in foods — Steviol glycosides — Conditions of admissibility — Interest in bringing proceedings)
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal treatment, food industry, freedom to provide services, infringement of EU law, organic product, restriction on competition, right to justice








C_2015236EN.01001201.xml










20.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 236/12





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — Andechser Molkerei Scheitz GmbH v European Commission
(Case C-682/13 P) (1)

((Appeals - Public health - List of food additives approved for use in foods - Steviol glycosides - Conditions of admissibility - Interest in bringing proceedings))
(2015/C 236/16)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Andechser Molkerei Scheitz GmbH (represented by: H. Schmidt, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Grünheid and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Andechser Molkerei Scheitz GmbH to pay the costs






(1)  OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.
Case T-254/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2015 — Stayer Ibérica v OHIM — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ (STAYER) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark STAYER — Earlier international word mark STAYER — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, tool industry, trade-mark law








C_2015236EN.01003302.xml










20.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 236/33





Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2015 — Stayer Ibérica v OHIM — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ (STAYER)
(Case T-254/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark STAYER - Earlier international word mark STAYER - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 236/44)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Stayer Ibérica, SA (Pinto, Spain) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: N. Bürglen, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 March 2013 (Case R 2196/2011-2), concerning invalidity proceedings between ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ and Stayer Ibérica, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 4 March 2013 (Case R 2196/2011-2) to the extent that it has declared the Community figurative mark STAYER invalid in respect of ‘parts of cutting and polishing diamond machines; bits and cutting wheels for the following industries: marble, granite, stone, clay, slabs, tiles and brick, and, in general terms, cutting tools as parts of the equipment included in Class 7’ in Class 7 and ‘hand held abrasive items (wheels and grinding wheels)’ in Class 8;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders OHIM, Stayer Ibérica, SA and ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Case T-222/14: Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2015 — Deluxe Laboratories v OHIM (deluxe) (Community trade mark — Application for figurative Community mark deluxe — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Lack of distinctiveness acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Duty to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, film industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015236EN.01004001.xml










20.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 236/40





Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2015 — Deluxe Laboratories v OHIM (deluxe)
(Case T-222/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for figurative Community mark deluxe - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Lack of descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Lack of distinctiveness acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Duty to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 236/53)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Deluxe Laboratories, Inc. (Burbank, California, United States) (represented by: S. Serrat Viñas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2014 (Case R 1250/2013-2) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign deluxe as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 January 2014 (Case R 1250/2013-2);










2.


Orders OHIM to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 175, 10.6.2014.
Case C-578/14: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Argenta Spaarbank NV v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Corporation taxes — Directive 90/435/EEC — Article 1(2) and Article 4(2) — Parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States — Common system of taxation — Deduction of taxable profits of the parent company — Factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Insufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: approximation of laws, corporation tax, parent company, subsidiary, tax relief








C_2015236EN.01002102.xml










20.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 236/21





Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Argenta Spaarbank NV v Belgische Staat
(Case C-578/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Corporation taxes - Directive 90/435/EEC - Article 1(2) and Article 4(2) - Parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States - Common system of taxation - Deduction of taxable profits of the parent company - Factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Insufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2015/C 236/30)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Argenta Spaarbank NV

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (Belgium), by Decision of 28 November 2014, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 81, 9.3.2015.
Case C-278/15 P: Appeal brought on 4 June 2015 by The Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2015 in Case T-581/13: Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, leather, office supplies, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_2016270EN.01001302.xml










25.7.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/13





Appeal brought on 4 June 2015 by The Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2015 in Case T-581/13: Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM
(Case C-278/15 P)
(2016/C 270/17)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd (represented by: J. Maitland-Walker, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
By order of 14 January 2016 the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
Decision of the Court of Justice of 4 June 2015 on official holidays and judicial vacations
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice (EU), operation of the Institutions, public holiday








C_2015220EN.01001301.xml










4.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 220/13





DECISION OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE
of 4 June 2015
on official holidays and judicial vacations
(2015/C 220/04)
THE COURT,
having regard to Article 24(2), (4) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure,
whereas it is necessary to establish the list of official holidays and to set the dates of the judicial vacations,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The list of official holidays within the meaning of Article 24(4) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure is established as follows:






—


New Year’s Day,










—


Easter Monday,










—


1 May,










—


Ascension,










—


Whit Monday,










—


23 June,










—


15 August,










—


1 November,










—


25 December,










—


26 December.




Article 2
For the period from 1 November 2015 to 31 October 2016, the dates of the judicial vacations within the meaning of Article 24(2) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure are as follows:






—


Christmas 2015: from Monday 21 December 2015 to Sunday 10 January 2016 inclusive,










—


Easter 2016: from Monday 21 March 2016 to Sunday 3 April 2016 inclusive,










—


Summer 2016: from Friday 22 July 2016 to Sunday 4 September 2016 inclusive.




Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Luxembourg, 4 June 2015.

A. CALOT ESCOBAR

Registrar



V. SKOURIS

President
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7605 — Equistone Partners Europe/Groupe Averys) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: archives, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, storage








C_2015183EN.01000201.xml










4.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 183/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7605 — Equistone Partners Europe/Groupe Averys)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 183/03)
On 27 May 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7605. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-399/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany (Appeals — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Access to the documents of the European institutions — Documents relating to the trade negotiations between the European Union and the Republic of India — Full access — Refusal)
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: India, access to EU information, confidentiality, trade information








C_2015236EN.01000501.xml










20.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 236/5





Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-399/13 P) (1)

((Appeals - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Access to the documents of the European institutions - Documents relating to the trade negotiations between the European Union and the Republic of India - Full access - Refusal))
(2015/C 236/06)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory (represented by: S. Crosby, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and I. Zervas, acting as Agents)
Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and J. Möller, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the appeal;










2)


Orders Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015183EN.01000301.xml










4.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 183/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

3 June 2015
(2015/C 183/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1134




JPY


Japanese yen


138,46




DKK


Danish krone


7,4597




GBP


Pound sterling


0,72750




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3890




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0427




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,7145




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,460




HUF


Hungarian forint


311,35




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1261




RON


Romanian leu


4,4288




TRY


Turkish lira


2,9824




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4321




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3856




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6330




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5586




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5018




KRW


South Korean won


1 233,44




ZAR


South African rand


13,6489




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9026




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5555




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 746,95




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1079




PHP


Philippine peso


49,872




RUB


Russian rouble


59,7700




THB


Thai baht


37,506




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4937




MXN


Mexican peso


17,2326




INR


Indian rupee


71,1522






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7551 — Advent/Hypo Group Alpe Adria AG (Southeast Europe banking network)) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-06-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, merger control, private investment








C_2015183EN.01000101.xml










4.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 183/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7551 — Advent/Hypo Group Alpe Adria AG (Southeast Europe banking network))
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 183/01)
On 28 May 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7551. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.