do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7597 — Sabadell/TSB) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-05-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, financial services, merger control








C_2015175EN.01000101.xml










29.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7597 — Sabadell/TSB)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 175/01)
On 18 May 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7597. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2015 to 28 February 2015 (Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)
Date: 2015-05-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: drug surveillance, market approval, marketing standard, medicinal product








C_2015176EN.01000101.xml










29.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 176/1





Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2015 to 28 February 2015
(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1))
(2015/C 176/01)
—   Issuing of a marketing authorisation (Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted













Date of the decision


Name of the medicinal product


INN (International Non-Proprietary Name)


Holder of the marketing authorisation


Number of the entry in the Community Register


Pharmaceutical form


ATC code (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Code)


Date of notification




10.2.2015


Suvaxyn CSF Marker


Live Recombinant E2 gene deleted Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus containing Classical Swine Fever E2 (CP7_E2alf)


Zoetis Belgium S.A.
Rue Laid Burniat 1,
1348 Louvain-la-Neuve,
Belgique


EU/2/14/179


Lyophilisate and solvent for suspension for injection


QI09AD04


12.2.2015




Anyone wishing to consult the public assessment report on the medicinal products in question and the decisions relating thereto is invited to contact:





The European Medicines Agency




30, Churchill Place, Canary Wharf




UK — LONDON E14 5EU






(1)  OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
Case T-274/15: Action brought on 29 May 2015 — Alcogroup and Alcodis v Commission
Date: 2015-05-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: breach of domicile, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence








C_2015279EN.01003801.xml










24.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/38






Action brought on 29 May 2015 — Alcogroup and Alcodis v Commission
(Case T-274/15)
(2015/C 279/47)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Alcogroup (Brussels, Belgium); and Alcodis (Brussels) (represented by: P. de Bandt, J. Dewispelaere and J. Probst, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the contested decisions;










—


order the Commission to pay all the costs of the present proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging that, by adopting and implementing the contested decisions, the Commission infringed the applicants’ rights of defence and their right to the inviolability of private premises and that it breached the principles of sound administration and proportionality.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/858 of 29 May 2015 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Uva de mesa embolsada del Vinalopó (PDO))
Date: 2015-05-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Community of Valencia, Spain, consumer information, designation of origin, foodstuff, grape, product designation








L_2015136EN.01000101.xml










3.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 136/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/858
of 29 May 2015
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Uva de mesa embolsada del Vinalopó (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Spain's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Uva de mesa embolsada del Vinalopó’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Uva de mesa embolsada del Vinalopó’ (PDO) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 May 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 of 12 June 1996 on the registration of geographical indications and designations of origin under the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 (OJ L 148, 21.6.1996, p. 1).

(3)  
            OJ C 18, 21.1.2015, p. 6.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/888 of 29 May 2015 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Arroz Carolino do Baixo Mondego (PGI))
Date: 2015-05-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Portugal, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, rice








L_2015146EN.01000101.xml










11.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 146/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/888
of 29 May 2015
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Arroz Carolino do Baixo Mondego (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Portugal's application to register the name ‘Arroz Carolino do Baixo Mondego’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Arroz Carolino do Baixo Mondego’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Arroz Carolino do Baixo Mondego’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. — Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 May 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 25, 24.1.2015, p. 18.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria
Date: 2015-05-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions








C_2015175EN.01000501.xml










29.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/5





Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria
(2015/C 175/03)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 (1), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/828 (2), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.
The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 should continue to apply to those persons and entities.
The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex IIa to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 16 of the Regulation).
The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 1 March 2016, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s next review, pursuant to Article 34 of Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Article 32(4) of Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, of the list of designated persons and entities.


(1)  OJ L 132, 29.5.2015, p. 82.

(2)  OJ L 132, 29.5.2015, p. 3.
Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2015 to 30 April 2015 (Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)
Date: 2015-05-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: drug surveillance, market approval, marketing standard, medicinal product








C_2015176EN.01001101.xml










29.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 176/11





Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2015 to 30 April 2015
(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC (1) or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC (2))
(2015/C 176/03)
—   Issuing, maintenance or modification of a national marketing authorization











Date of the decision


Name(s) of the medicinal product


INN (International Non-Proprietary Name)


Holder(s) of the marketing authorization


Member State concerned


Date of notification




15.4.2015


fentanyl


fentanyl


Not applicable


Not applicable


16.4.2015






(1)  OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67.

(2)  OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 1.
Case C-253/15 P: Appeal brought on 29 May 2015 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 19 March 2015 in Case T-412/13: Chin Haur Indonesia, PT v Council of the European Union
Date: 2015-05-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Indonesia, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2015254EN.01001002.xml










3.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 254/10





Appeal brought on 29 May 2015 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 19 March 2015 in Case T-412/13: Chin Haur Indonesia, PT v Council of the European Union
(Case C-253/15 P)
(2015/C 254/14)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, M. França, agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Chin Haur Indonesia, PT, Council of the European Union, Maxcom Ltd

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2015, notified to the Commission on 23 March 2015, in Case T-412/13 Chin Haur Indonesia, PT v. Council of the European Union, reject the Application at first instance, and order the Applicant to pay the costs;
or, alternatively,










—


refer back the case to the General Court for reconsideration; reserve the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The appeal brought by the Commission concerns the judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2015 in Case T-412/13. In that judgment, the General Court annulled, to the extent that it concerns Chin Haur Indonesia, PT, Article 1(1) and 3 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 (1) of 29 May 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 on imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not.
The Commission relies, in support of its appeal, on three grounds of appeal.
First, the Commission argues that the General Court could not legally draw the conclusion that the Council had breached Article 13(1) of the Basic anti-dumping Regulation (2), because such a conclusion is based on an incorrect interpretation of the relevant recital of the contested Regulation and on an incorrect interpretation of Article 13(1) of the Basic anti-dumping Regulation. Second, the Commission argues that the General Court provided an insufficient and contradictory reasoning for its conclusion, in breach of Article 36 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Third, the Commission considers that the General Court breached the procedural rights of the Commission under Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice.


(1)  OJ L 153, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community OJ L 343, p. 51.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-05-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015175EN.01000701.xml










29.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/7





Euro exchange rates (1)

28 May 2015
(2015/C 175/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0896




JPY


Japanese yen


135,36




DKK


Danish krone


7,4598




GBP


Pound sterling


0,71240




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2617




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0344




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,4910




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,463




HUF


Hungarian forint


308,65




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1289




RON


Romanian leu


4,4435




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8970




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4267




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3594




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4484




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5213




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4723




KRW


South Korean won


1 208,30




ZAR


South African rand


13,2001




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,7568




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5817




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 380,97




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9797




PHP


Philippine peso


48,560




RUB


Russian rouble


57,1277




THB


Thai baht


36,909




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4373




MXN


Mexican peso


16,7079




INR


Indian rupee


69,5410






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria apply
Date: 2015-05-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Syria, data processing, economic sanctions, international sanctions








C_2015175EN.01000601.xml










29.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/6





Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria apply
(2015/C 175/04)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (2).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
Case C-255/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 29 May 2015 — Steef Mennens v Emirates Direktion für Deutschland
Date: 2015-05-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air freight rate, air transport, carriage of passengers, indemnification, ticket








C_2015294EN.01002101.xml










7.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/21






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 29 May 2015 — Steef Mennens v Emirates Direktion für Deutschland
(Case C-255/15)
(2015/C 294/26)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Steef Mennens

Defendant: Emirates Direktion für Deutschland

Questions referred







I.


Is Article 10(2), in conjunction with Article 2(f), of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a ‘ticket’ is the document by which the passenger is (also) entitled to be transported on the flight on which he was downgraded, irrespective of whether further flights, such as connecting flights or return flights, are also indicated on that document?










II.








a.


If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:
Is Article 10(2), in conjunction with Article 2(f), of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 to be further interpreted as meaning that the ‘price of the ticket’ is the amount which the passenger has paid for all of the flights indicated on the ticket, even if the downgrading occurred on only one of the flights?










b.


If Question 1 is answered in the negative:
For the purposes of determining the amount which forms the basis for the reimbursement under Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, must account be taken of the airline company’s published price for transportation, in the class booked, on the section affected by the downgrade, or must the quotient resulting from the distance of the section affected by the downgrade and the total length of the flight be determined and then multiplied by the total flight price?














III.


Is Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 to be further interpreted as meaning that the ‘price of the ticket’ is only the price of the flight alone, to the exclusion of taxes and charges?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).