do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-05-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015172EN.01002401.xml










27.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 172/24





Euro exchange rates (1)

26 May 2015
(2015/C 172/08)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0926




JPY


Japanese yen


134,07




DKK


Danish krone


7,4549




GBP


Pound sterling


0,70960




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1860




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0351




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,3685




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,407




HUF


Hungarian forint


309,17




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1391




RON


Romanian leu


4,4598




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8751




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4020




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3520




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4706




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,4981




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4707




KRW


South Korean won


1 207,02




ZAR


South African rand


13,1248




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,7785




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5598




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 436,20




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9642




PHP


Philippine peso


48,790




RUB


Russian rouble


55,0995




THB


Thai baht


36,799




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4121




MXN


Mexican peso


16,7097




INR


Indian rupee


69,8445






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1236/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down a scheme of control and enforcement applicable in the area covered by the Convention on future multilateral cooperation in the North-East Atlantic fisheries (COM(2015) 121 final — 2015/0063 COD)
Date: 2015-05-27
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, fishery management, fishery resources, fishing area, fishing controls, fishing rights, international cooperation, international waters, sea fishing








C_2015332EN.01008101.xml










8.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 332/81





Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1236/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down a scheme of control and enforcement applicable in the area covered by the Convention on future multilateral cooperation in the North-East Atlantic fisheries
(COM(2015) 121 final — 2015/0063 COD)
(2015/C 332/10)
On 25 March 2015 the European Parliament and on 23 March 2015 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43(2) of the TFEU, on the:

‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1236/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down a scheme of control and enforcement applicable in the area covered by the Convention on future multilateral cooperation in the North-East Atlantic fisheries’

(COM(2015) 121 final — 2015/0063 COD).
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing specific conditions to fishing for deep-sea stocks in the North-East Atlantic and provisions for fishing in international waters of the North-East Atlantic and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002’, adopted on 13 February 2013 (1), and in its opinion on the ‘Action Plan for a Maritime Strategy in the Atlantic area — Delivering smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’, adopted on 18 September 2013 (2), it decided, at its 508th plenary session of 27 and 28 May 2015 (meeting of 27 May 2015), by 173 votes with 10 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the abovementioned documents.

Brussels, 27 May 2015


The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Henri MALOSSE




(1)  OJ C 133, 9.5.2013, p. 41.

(2)  OJ C 341, 21.11.2013, p. 77.
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/874 of 27 May 2015 on the acceptance of a third State's contribution to the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali) (EUTM Mali/1/2015)
Date: 2015-05-27
Institutions: Political and Security Committee
Subjects: Albania, EU military mission, Mali, military training




L_2015142EN.01002801.xml










6.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 142/28








            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/874
of 27 May 2015
         
on the acceptance of a third State's contribution to the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali) (EUTM Mali/1/2015)


THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision 2013/34/CFSP of 17 January 2013 on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali) (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2013/34/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to invite third States to offer contributions and to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States.












(2)


Following the recommendation on a contribution from the Republic of Albania (‘Albania’) by the EU Mission Commander and the recommendation from the European Union Military Committee, the contribution from Albania should be accepted.












(3)


In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1

1.   The contribution from Albania to the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali) is accepted and is considered to be significant.


2.   Albania is exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUTM Mali.



Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 27 May 2015.


For the Political and Security Committee


The Chairperson

W. STEVENS
            





(1)  
            OJ L 14, 18.1.2013, p. 19.
Case C-248/15 P: Appeal brought on 27 May 2015 by Maxcom Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 19 March 2015 in Case T-413/13: City Cycle Industries v Council of the European Union
Date: 2015-05-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Sri Lanka, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2015262EN.01000802.xml










10.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/8





Appeal brought on 27 May 2015 by Maxcom Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 19 March 2015 in Case T-413/13: City Cycle Industries v Council of the European Union
(Case C-248/15 P)
(2015/C 262/11)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Maxcom Ltd (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat, J. Beck, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: City Cycle Industries, Council of the European Union, European Commission

Form of order sought

The Appellant claims that the Court should:






—


Declare the Appeal admissible and well-founded;










—


Set aside the General Court’s findings with regard to the second part of the first plea in law:










—


Dismiss the first plea in law of the Applicant before the General Court in its entirety; and










—


Order the Applicant before the General Court to pay the Appellant’s costs for the Appeal and the Intervention before the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the Appellant put forward the following arguments:






—


The General Court manifestly erred by holding that under Article 13(1) of the Basic Regulation (1) the Council could not conclude that the Applicant before the General Court engaged in transhipment from the facts that (i) the Applicant before the General Court was not a genuine Sri Lankan producer and (ii) did not undertake assembly operations that went beyond the thresholds set out in Article 13(2) of the Basic Regulation.










—


In the alternative: The annulment of Regulation 501/2013 (2) as far as it concerns the Applicant before the General Court is not justified even if the Council’s findings on transhipment were incorrect as the Court confirmed that the Applicant before the General Court engaged in assembly operations that did not go beyond the threshold set out in Article 13(2) of the Basic Regulation and also confirmed the existence of all other criteria required for not granting the Applicant before the General Court an exemption from the circumvention measures.






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community

OJ L 343, p. 51.

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 of 29 May 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 on imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not

OJ L 153, p. 1.
Case C-243/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 27 May 2015 — Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Obvodný úrad Trenčín
Date: 2015-05-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative procedure, environmental protection, judicial review, non-profit organisation, right to justice








C_2015279EN.01001801.xml










24.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/18






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 27 May 2015 — Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Obvodný úrad Trenčín
(Case C-243/15)
(2015/C 279/22)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK

Respondent: Obvodný úrad Trenčín

In the presence of: Biely potok, a.s.

Question referred

Is it possible to guarantee the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, affirmed in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in the event of a purported breach of the right to a high level of environmental protection established under the conditions laid down by the European Union, mainly by Council Directive 92/43/EEC (1) of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, particularly [the right] to help to obtain the public’s opinion on a project which could have a significant impact on special areas of conservation falling within the European ecological ‘Natura 2000’ network, and the rights invoked by the appellant (as a not-for-profit association active in the protection of the environment at national level) under Article 9 of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters, within the limits indicated by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment of 8 March 2011 in Case C-240/09 [Lesoochranárske zoskupenie], where the national court terminates the judicial review proceedings in a case concerning the review of a decision refusing to grant [that association] the status of party in administrative proceedings regarding the issuing of a permit, as has happened in the present case, and invites [that association] to lodge an appeal against its having been excluded from those administrative proceedings?


(1)  
            OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7.
Case T-267/15: Action brought on 27 May 2015 — db Technologies Deutschland v OHIM — MIP Metro (Sigma)
Date: 2015-05-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, sound reproduction equipment, trade-mark law








C_2015245EN.01004001.xml










27.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/40





Action brought on 27 May 2015 — db Technologies Deutschland v OHIM — MIP Metro (Sigma)
(Case T-267/15)
(2015/C 245/48)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: db Technologies Deutschland GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: K. Zingsheim, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Sigma’ — Application No 10 779 734

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 March 2015 in Case R 1444/2014-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and the decision of OHIM of 28 April 2014 and reject the opponent’s/defendant’s opposition;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-247/15 P: Appeal brought on 27 May 2015 by Maxcom Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 19 March 2015 in Case T-412/13: Chin Haur Indonesia, PT v Council of the European Union
Date: 2015-05-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Indonesia, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2015262EN.01000801.xml










10.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/8





Appeal brought on 27 May 2015 by Maxcom Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 19 March 2015 in Case T-412/13: Chin Haur Indonesia, PT v Council of the European Union
(Case C-247/15 P)
(2015/C 262/10)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Maxcom Ltd (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat, J. Beck, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Chin Haur Indonesia, PT; Council of the European Union; European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


Declare the Appeal admissible and well-founded;










—


Set aside the General Court’s findings with regard to the second part of the first plea in law;










—


Dismiss the first plea in law of the Applicant before the General Court in its entirety; and










—


Order the Applicant before the General Court to pay the Appellant’s costs for the Appeal and the Intervention before the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the Appellant put forward the following arguments:






—


The General Court manifestly erred by holding that under Article 13(1) of the Basic Regulation (1) the Council could not conclude that the Applicant before the General Court engaged in transhipment from the facts that (i) the Applicant before the General Court was not a genuine Indonesian producer and (ii) did not undertake assembly operations that went beyond the thresholds set out in Article 13(2) of the Basic Regulation.










—


In the alternative: The annulment of Regulation 501/2013 (2) as far as it concerns the Applicant before the General Court is not justified even if the Council’s findings on transhipment were incorrect as the Court confirmed that the Applicant before the General Court engaged in assembly operations that did not go beyond the thresholds set out in Article 13(2) of the Basic Regulation and also confirmed the existence of all other criteria required for not granting the Applicant before the General Court an exemption from the circumvention measures.






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community

OJ L 343, p. 51.


(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 of 29 May 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 on imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not

OJ L 153, p. 1.
Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
Date: 2015-05-27
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Libya, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








C_2015172EN.01002201.xml










27.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 172/22





Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
(2015/C 172/06)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities who are presently designated in Annex II and IV to Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP (1) and in Annex III to Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.
The Council intends to amend the statements of reasons for the following persons and entities: Mr ABDUSSALAM Abdussalam Mohammed, Mr ABU SHAARIYA, Mr ASHKAL Omar, Dr AL-BAGHDADI Abdulqader Mohammed, Mr DIBRI Abdulqader Yusef, Mr QADHAF AL-DAM Sayyid Mohammed, TOHAMI General Khaled, Mr FARKASH Mohammed Boucharaya, Mr EL-KASSIM ZOUAI Mohamed Abou, Mr AL-MAHMOUDI Baghdadi, Mr HIJAZI Mohamad Mahmoud, Mr AL-GAOUD Abdelmajid, Mr AL-CHARIF Ibrahim Zarroug, Mr FAKHIRI Abdelkebir Mohamad, Mr MANSOUR Abdallah, Mr AL QADHAFI Quren Salih Quren, Mr AL KUNI Colonel Amid Husain and Mr Taher Juwadi, Waatassimou Foundation, Revolutionary Guard Corps, Al-Inma Holding Co. for Services Investments, Al-Inma Holding Co. for Industrial Investments and Al-Inma Holding Co. for Construction and Real Estate Developments (listed as Nos 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 5, 7, 18, 19 and 22 respectively in Annex II and IV to Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP and in Annex III to Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011).
The persons and entities concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons, before 10 June 2015, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu






(1)  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 53.

(2)  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2015/652 of 20 April 2015 laying down calculation methods and reporting requirements pursuant to Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels (OJ L 107, 25.4.2015)
Date: 2015-05-27
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: approximation of laws, diesel fuel, environmental standard, petrol, qualitative analysis, quality standard, reduction of gas emissions








L_2015129EN.01005301.xml










27.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 129/53







Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2015/652 of 20 April 2015 laying down calculation methods and reporting requirements pursuant to Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 107 of 25 April 2015
)


On page 31, Annex I, Part 1, point 3, in the formula:
for:

               ‘
               GHHix

               ’,
read:

               ‘
               GHGix

               ’.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-05-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015172EN.01002301.xml










27.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 172/23





Euro exchange rates (1)

25 May 2015
(2015/C 172/07)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0978




JPY


Japanese yen


133,39




DKK


Danish krone


7,4552




GBP


Pound sterling


0,71000




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2425




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0349




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,3900




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,372




HUF


Hungarian forint


307,71




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1075




RON


Romanian leu


4,4539




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8665




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4023




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3496




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5100




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5025




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4728




KRW


South Korean won


1 204,41




ZAR


South African rand


13,1034




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,8098




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5383




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 471,40




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9668




PHP


Philippine peso


48,958




RUB


Russian rouble


54,8810




THB


Thai baht


36,882




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4250




MXN


Mexican peso


16,7662




INR


Indian rupee


69,7761






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.