do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-300/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Fricopan Back v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate — Action for annulment — Application to amend the form of order sought — No new information — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2015-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, countertrade, electricity supply, energy consumption, renewable energy, terms for aid








C_2015245EN.01002601.xml










27.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/26





Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Fricopan Back v Commission
(Case T-300/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate - Action for annulment - Application to amend the form of order sought - No new information - Inadmissibility))
(2015/C 245/31)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Fricopan Back GmbH Immekath (Klötze, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz, M. Ringel, B. Wißmann, M. Püstow, C. Oehme and T. Wielsch lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


The application seeking that the form of order sought in the present action be amended to cover Commission decision C (2014) 8786 final of 25 November 2014 relating to State Aid SA. 33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users is rejected as inadmissible.










3.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.










4.


Fricopan Back GmbH Immekath shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.










5.


The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Case T-258/15: Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Axa Mediterranean Holding v Commission
Date: 2015-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, State aid, amortisation, control of State aid, corporation tax, goodwill, reimbursement of aid, shareholding, tax relief








C_2015245EN.01003901.xml










27.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/39





Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Axa Mediterranean Holding v Commission
(Case T-258/15)
(2015/C 245/46)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Axa Mediterranean Holding, S.A (Palma de Mallorca, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, D. Armesto Macías and A. Balcells Cartagena, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Article 1 of the contested decision in so far as it declares that the new administrative interpretation of Article 12 TRLIS adopted by the Spanish administration must be regarded as state aid which is incompatible with the interior market;










—


annul Article 4(1) of the contested decision in so far as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to put an end to the alleged aid scheme as described in Article 1;










—


annul Article 4(2)(3)(4) and (5) of the contested decision in so far as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to recover the amounts considered by the Commission to be State aid;










—


in the alternative, limit the scope of the recovery obligation imposed on the Kingdom of Spain by Article 4(2) of the contested decision in the same terms as in the first and second decisions; and










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested decision in the present proceedings is the same as in cases T-12/15, Banco de Santander and Santusa v Commission and T-252/15 Ferrovial SA and Others v Commission.

The pleas in law and the main arguments put forward are similar to those relied on in those cases.
Case T-287/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Schaeffler Technologies v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, countertrade, electricity supply, energy consumption, renewable energy, terms for aid








C_2015245EN.01001902.xml










27.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/19





Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Schaeffler Technologies v Commission
(Case T-287/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 245/23)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Schaeffler Technologies GmbH & Co. KG (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz, B. Wißmann, M. Püstow, M. Ringel, C. Oehme and T. Wielsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.










3.


Schaeffler Technologies GmbH & Co. KG shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.










4.


The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Case T-297/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Walter Klein v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, countertrade, electricity supply, energy consumption, renewable energy, terms for aid








C_2015245EN.01002402.xml










27.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/24





Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Walter Klein v Commission
(Case T-297/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 245/29)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Walter Klein GmbH & Co. KG (Wuppertal, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz, M. Ringel, B. Wißmann, M. Püstow, C. Oehme and T. Wielsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.










3.


Walter Klein GmbH & Co. KG shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.










4.


The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Corrigendum to Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2015/371 of Amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2014 (OJ L 73, 17.3.2015)
Date: 2015-05-22
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: adoption of the budget, amending budget, budgetary resources, financial year, general budget (EU)








L_2015127EN.01006101.xml










22.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 127/61







Corrigendum to Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2015/371 of Amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2014

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 73 of 17 March 2015
)


On page 516, in the column ‘New amount’, in the ‘Title 1 — OWN RESOURCES’ row:
for:


                     ‘
                     124 290 661 280
                     ’
                  
,read:


                     ‘
                     128 387 935 513
                     ’
                  
;and, in the ‘GRAND TOTAL’ row:
for:


                     ‘
                     134 936 959 482
                     ’
                  
,read:


                     ‘
                     139 034 233 715
                     ’
                  
;on page 518, in the column ‘New amount’, in the ‘Chapter 1 4’ and ‘Article 1 4 0’ rows:
for:


                     ‘
                     90 516 325 930
                     ’
                  
,read:


                     ‘
                     94 613 600 163
                     ’
                  
;and, in the ‘Title 1 — Total’ row:
for:


                     ‘
                     124 290 661 280
                     ’
                  
,read:


                     ‘
                     128 387 935 513
                     ’
                  
;on page 519, in the column ‘New amount’ of the table:
for:


                     ‘
                     90 516 325 930
                     ’
                  
,read:


                     ‘
                     94 613 600 163
                     ’
                  
.
Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
Date: 2015-05-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, miscellaneous industries, mobile phone








C_2015168EN.01000301.xml










22.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 168/3





Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(2015/C 168/03)
Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

Page 188








4202 31 00


to


4202 39 00




Articles of a kind normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag






The following text is inserted after the first paragraph:


‘These subheadings also include mobile phone cases which, by their nature and design, are normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag.’



(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/807 of 22 May 2015 amending for the 232nd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaeda network
Date: 2015-05-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic sanctions, international sanctions, terrorism








L_2015128EN.01001601.xml










23.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 128/16








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/807
of 22 May 2015
         
amending for the 232nd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaeda network


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaida network (1), and in particular point (a) of Article 7(1) and Article 7a(5) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.












(2)


On 18 May 2015, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) decided to remove one person from its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.












(3)


Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be updated accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 May 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,


Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments






(1)  
            OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9.




ANNEX
In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 the following entry under the heading ‘Natural persons’ is deleted:


            ‘Abdul Rahim Al-Talhi (alias (a) 'Abdul-Rahim Hammad al-Talhi, (b) Abd' Al-Rahim Hamad al-Tahi, (c) Abdulrheem Hammad A Altalhi, (d) Abe Al-Rahim al-Talahi, (e) Abd Al-Rahim Al Tahli, (f) 'Abd al-Rahim al- Talhi, (g) Abdulrahim Al Tahi, (h) Abdulrahim al-Talji, (i) 'Abd-Al-Rahim al Talji, (j) Abdul Rahim Hammad Ahmad Al-Talhi, (k) Abdul Rahim, (l) Abu Al Bara'a Al Naji, (m) Shuwayb Junayd. Address: Buraydah, Saudi Arabia. Date of birth: 8.12.1961. Place of birth: Al-Shefa, Al-Taif, Saudi Arabia. Passport No: F275043 (Saudi Arabian, issued on 29.5.2004, expired on 5.4.2009). Nationality: Saudi Arabian. Other information: Involved in the financing of, arms supply to and otherwise provided assistance to the Abu Sayyaf Group. Date of designation referred to in point (b) of Article 2a(4): 9.10.2007.’
Case T-296/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Erbslöh v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, countertrade, electricity supply, energy consumption, renewable energy, terms for aid








C_2015245EN.01002401.xml










27.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/24





Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Erbslöh v Commission
(Case T-296/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 245/28)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Erbslöh AG (Velbert, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz, M. Ringel, B. Wißmann, M. Püstow, C. Oehme and T. Wielsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.










3.


Erbslöh AG shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.










4.


The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Case T-260/15: Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Iberdrola v Commission
Date: 2015-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, amortisation, control of State aid, corporation tax, goodwill, reimbursement of aid, shareholding, tax relief








C_2015254EN.01001601.xml










3.8.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 254/16





Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Iberdrola v Commission
(Case T-260/15)
(2015/C 254/19)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Iberdrola, SA (Biblao, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Forms of order sought







—


annul Article 1;










—


annul Article 4(1) of the contested decision insofar as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to put an end to the aid scheme referred to in Article 1;










—


annul Article 4(2), (3), (4) and (5) of the contested decision, insofar as it orders the recovery of the State aid established by the Commission;










—


in the alternative, limit the scope of the recovery obligation imposed on the Kingdom of Spain by Article 4(2) of the contested decision under the same terms as those established in the First and Second Decisions, and










—


order the Commission to bear the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested decision in these proceedings is the same as that in Cases T-12/15, Banco de Santander and Santusa v Commission and T-252/15 Ferrovial SA and Others v Commission.
The pleas and main arguments relied on are similar to those already raised in those cases.
Case C-237/15: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Ireland (Ireland) made on 22 May 2015 — Minister for Justice and Equality v Francis Lanigan
Date: 2015-05-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, extradition, judicial cooperation, mutual recognition principle








C_2015236EN.01003001.xml










20.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 236/30





Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Ireland (Ireland) made on 22 May 2015 — Minister for Justice and Equality v Francis Lanigan
(Case C-237/15)
(2015/C 236/40)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Ireland

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Minister for Justice and Equality

Defendant: Francis Lanigan

Questions referred







1.


What is the effect of a failure to observe the time limits stipulated in Article 17 of the Framework Decision of the 13th June, 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member States (2002/584/JHA) (1) read in conjunction with the provisions of Article 15 of the said Framework decision?










2.


Does failure to observe the time limits stipulated in Article 17 of the Framework Decision of the 13th June, 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member States (2002/584/JHA) give rise to rights on the part of an individual who has been held in custody pending a decision on his/her surrender for a period in excess of those time periods?






(1)  OJ L 190, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-05-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015168EN.01000201.xml










22.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 168/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

21 May 2015
(2015/C 168/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1133




JPY


Japanese yen


134,79




DKK


Danish krone


7,4577




GBP


Pound sterling


0,70990




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2613




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0394




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,4330




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,351




HUF


Hungarian forint


306,97




PLN


Polish zloty


4,0959




RON


Romanian leu


4,4490




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8611




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4112




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3600




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6322




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5239




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4875




KRW


South Korean won


1 218,13




ZAR


South African rand


13,1113




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,8980




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5398




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 620,12




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,0123




PHP


Philippine peso


49,433




RUB


Russian rouble


55,2685




THB


Thai baht


37,203




BRL


Brazilian real


3,3530




MXN


Mexican peso


16,8999




INR


Indian rupee


70,8201






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.