Resolution of the European Parliament of 29 April 2015 with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2013
Date: 2015-04-29
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: European Union Agency for Asylum, budgetary discharge, financial year, general budget (EU)








L_2015255EN.01019901.xml










30.9.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 255/199








            RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
         
of 29 April 2015
         
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2013


THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,






—


having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2013,










—


having regard to Rule 94 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0085/2015),










A.


whereas, according to its financial statements, the final budget of the European Asylum Support Office (‘the Office’) for the financial year 2013 was EUR 10 500 000; whereas the entire budget of the Office derives from the Union budget,










B.


whereas the Court of Auditors, in its report on the annual accounts of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2013 (‘the Court's report’), has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Office's annual accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular,






Follow-up of 2012 discharge









1.


Notes from the Court's report that regarding the 12 comments made by the Court in its 2012 report, two are now marked as ‘Completed’, one as ‘Ongoing’, eight as ‘Not Applicable’ and one as ‘Outstanding’;












2.


Acknowledges from the Office that it has conducted a physical inventory which was finalised at the end of 2013;












3.


Acknowledges from the Office that information on its activities' impact on Union citizens is available on its website through the yearly publication of documents, including press releases, monthly newsletters or direct responses to requests from Union citizens;





Comments on the reliability of the accounts









4.


Notes with concern from the Court's report that the basis for an accrual amounting to EUR 40 000 relating to expenses and allowances for staff who entered into service in 2013 was not made available in the course of the audit; acknowledges from the Office that the accrual was an estimate while waiting for the confirmation of all entitlements to be received by the staff;





Comments on the legality and regularity of transactions









5.


Notes from the Office that its accounting system was effectively validated by its accounting officer;





Budget and financial management









6.


Notes that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2013 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 87,34 % and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 87,18 %; emphasises that the Office improved its payment appropriations execution rate remarkably compared to the previous year;





Commitments and carry-overs









7.


Notes with concern from the Court's report that the budgetary needs were overestimated by 13 % and that committed appropriations carried over were at 24 % of the total committed appropriations, of which 13 % were not covered by a legal commitment;












8.


Takes note that the carry-overs of committed appropriations mostly relate to Title II and Title III budgetary lines and are mostly intended for invoices not yet received or paid at year-end or where the services in question were not delivered;












9.


Notes the measures taken by the Office in order to reduce and safeguard the level of commitment appropriations carried over, such as monthly reports on budget execution, annual mid-year budget review and the adoption of its new financial regulation;












10.


Notes that a considerable room for improvement in budgetary planning still exists, although significant improvements were made in comparison with the financial year 2012, during which the Office gained its financial independence; calls on the Office to further improve its budget monitoring efforts in the future;





Procurement and recruitment procedures









11.


Notes with concern that the recruitment procedures show a lack of transparency; agrees with the Court's comment that drafting the questions for interviews and written tests after examination of the applications increases the risk of the questions being influenced by individual applications; notes, moreover, that a discrepancy was observed in one recruitment procedure between an eligibility criterion indicated in the vacancy notice and corresponding selection criterion; calls on the Office to inform Parliament and the Council on the steps taken to prevent similar situations in the future;





Prevention and management of conflicts of interests and transparency









12.


Acknowledges from the Office that it complied with the Court's comments and changed the conflicts of interests' statement for the Selection Committees in order to include a professional relationship as a potential conflict of interests;












13.


Acknowledges from the Office that a policy on the prevention and management of conflicts of interests has been signed in 2013 and that its Management Board has endorsed it; notes, furthermore, that the members of the Management Board and the Executive Director have signed conflicts of interests forms in accordance with that policy; calls on the Office to make both its conflicts of interests policy and the conflicts of interests forms signed by the members of the Management Board and the Executive Director publically available;





Internal controls









14.


Notes with concern that 18 % of the total number of payments were made after the time limits set in the Office's financial regulation; takes note from the Office that although the number of late payments decreased by mid-2013, they occurred again in the last quarter of 2013, due to a considerable increase in the year-end workload; welcomes the new procedures put in place by the Office in order to decrease the rate of late payments; calls on the Office to remedy this issue as a matter of urgency and to inform Parliament and the Council on the effects of the measures taken;












15.


Acknowledges from the Office that in 2013 the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) carried out a limited review of the implementation of 16 Internal Control Standards (ICS) adopted by the Management Board; notes that, based on the results of that review and given the current status of internal control regarding the Office's operational activities and administrative support functions, the IAS has issued 18 recommendations, six rated as ‘Very Important’ and 12 as ‘Important’;












16.


Takes note that the Office carried out a self-assessment regarding the status of the implementation of the ICS in March 2013, demonstrating its determination in understanding and establishing a valid internal control environment;












17.


Establishes from the Court's report that six of the 16 ICS have not been fully implemented; acknowledges that their implementation is ongoing and calls on the Office to report to Parliament and the Council on its results;












18.


Refers, for other observations of a cross-cutting nature accompanying its decision on discharge, to its Resolution of 29 April 2015 (1) on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.






(1)  Texts adopted of that date, P8_TA(2015)0130 (see page 431 of this Official Journal).