Case C-174/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag (Netherlands) lodged on 17 April 2015 — Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht; interveners: Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Others
Date: 2015-04-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: book trade, copyright, digitisation, downloading, hiring, reprography, virtual library








C_2015213EN.01001701.xml










29.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag (Netherlands) lodged on 17 April 2015 — Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht; interveners: Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Others
(Case C-174/15)
(2015/C 213/27)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Den Haag

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken

Defendant: Stichting Leenrecht

Interveners: Nederlands Uitgeversverbond, Stichting LIRA, Stichting Pictoright

Questions referred







1)


Are Articles 1(1), 2(1)(b) and 6(1) of Directive 2006/115 (1) to be construed as meaning that ‘lending’ as referred to in those provisions also means making copyright-protected novels, collections of short stories, biographies, travelogues, children’s books and youth literature available for use, not for direct or indirect economic or commercial advantage, via a publicly accessible establishment






—


by placing a digital copy (reproduction A) on the server of the establishment and enabling a user to reproduce that copy by downloading it on to his/her own computer (reproduction B),










—


in such a way that the copy made by the user when downloading (reproduction B) is no longer usable after a limited period, and










—


in such a way that other users cannot download the copy (reproduction A) on to their computers during that period?














2)


If Question 1 is to be answered in the affirmative: does Article 6 of Directive 2006/115 and/or any other provision of EU law preclude Member States from imposing on the application of the restriction on the lending right included in Article 6 of Directive 2006/115 a condition that the copy of the work made available by the establishment (reproduction A) must have been brought into circulation by an initial sale or other transfer of ownership of that copy within the European Union by the rightholder or with his consent within the meaning of Article 4(2) of Directive 2001/29 (2)?










3)


If Question 2 is to be answered in the negative: does Article 6 of Directive 2006/115 lay down other requirements for the source of the copy (reproduction A) provided by the establishment, for instance the requirement that the copy was obtained from a lawful source?










4)


If Question 2 is to be answered in the affirmative: is Article 4(2) of Directive 2001/29 to be construed as meaning that the initial sale or other transfer of ownership of material as referred to in that provision also means making available remotely by downloading, for use for an unlimited period, a digital copy of copyright-protected novels, collections of short stories, biographies, travelogues, children’s books and youth literature?






(1)  Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property (codified version) (OJ 2006 L 376, p. 28).

(2)  Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10).