Proposal for a COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION authorising Denmark to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 75 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC
Date: 2015-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, VAT, derogation from EU law, prevention of delinquency, tax avoidance, tax collection, vehicle registration













EUR-Lex - 52015PC0148 - EN











|



52015PC0148

Proposal for a COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION authorising Denmark to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 75 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC /* COM/2015/0148 final - 2015/0074 (NLE) */









EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
Pursuant to Article 395 of Council
Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added
tax (hereafter "the VAT Directive"), the Council, acting unanimously
on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to apply
special measures derogating from the provisions of that Directive, in order to
simplify the procedure for collecting value added tax (VAT) or to prevent
certain forms of tax evasion or avoidance. 
By letter registered with the Commission on
13 January 2015, Denmark requested authorisation to apply a measure derogating
from Article 75 of the VAT Directive. 
In accordance with Article 395(2) of the
VAT Directive, the Commission informed the other Member States by letters dated
13 and 14 February 2015 of the request made by Denmark. By letter dated 17
February 2015, the Commission notified Denmark that it had all the information
necessary to consider the request. 
General context
In order to simplify VAT collection and
combat tax evasion, Denmark requested in 2011 an individual derogation which
would allow the introduction of a flat-rate scheme for the private use of light
goods vehicles with a maximum authorised weight of up to three tonnes which
have been registered solely for business use. The derogation request was
approved by Council Implementing Decision 2012/447/EU of 24 July 2012[1], and expired on 31
December 2014. 
Without any such derogating measure the
Danish legislation implies that any private use of such a vehicle registered
solely for business purposes would have as a consequence that the taxable
person loses in full the right of deduction of the VAT on the purchase cost of
the vehicle. Denmark makes use of a standstill provision under Article 176 of
the VAT Directive regarding the deduction of VAT on the purchase and running
costs of light goods vehicles with a maximum authorised weight of up to three
tonnes. If a business registers such a light goods vehicle as being solely for
business purposes, it will be authorised to deduct in full the VAT on the
purchase of the vehicle as well as the running costs. However, a business which
registers a light goods vehicle as being both for business and personal use is
not authorised to deduct the VAT on the purchase cost, but can deduct in full
the VAT on the running costs of the vehicle. 
The Danish system as described above can be
complicated and costly to administer, both for the taxable person and for the
tax administration. Denmark has therefore requested to apply a simplified
procedure as previously granted by Council Implementing Decision 2012/447/EU.
According to the Danish authorities, the simplified procedure has worked very
well the last years and they find good reasons to continue with such a procedure.
As the request for an extension of the measure was first received by the
Commission after the expiration of the previously granted derogation measure,
this proposal cannot extend the previous measure with retroactive effect. 
The flat-rate system could be used by a
taxable person for up to twenty days per calendar year for a cost of DKK 40 per
day. The amount of DKK 40 per day would cover only VAT and has been determined
by the Danish Government on the basis of an analysis of national statistics. A
similar payment, under separate national legislation, would be required to
cover income tax on the disposal of a company car, and a surcharge to the
circulation tax. Should the taxable person use the vehicle for more than twenty
days during a calendar year, the standstill rules would apply, and the taxable
person would lose in full the right of deduction of the purchase costs of the
vehicle. 
The Danish authorities have developed an
electronic system whereby taxable persons can pay the daily flat-rate online. The
authorities consider the system to simplify the accounting obligations for the
taxable persons as well as the tax authorities' duty to collect and charge the
tax.
The simplified procedure is optional. The
taxable person would therefore still be able to register their light goods
vehicle for both business and private use if that suits their circumstances. 
2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS
WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
There was no need for consultation or
external expertise. The derogation would only have a negligible effect on the
overall amount of tax revenue collected at the stage of final consumption,
whereas it has benefits for businesses using light goods vehicles for both
private and professional use and simplifies tax collection.
3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE
PROPOSAL
The Decision authorises Denmark to
introduce a special measure derogating from the VAT Directive as regards the
accounting of the VAT on the private use of certain vehicles. 
Legal basis
Article 395 of the VAT Directive.
Subsidiarity principle
Considering the provision of the VAT
Directive on which the proposal is based, the proposal falls under the
exclusive competence of the Union. The subsidiarity principle therefore does
not apply.
Proportionality principle
The proposal complies with the
proportionality principle for the following reasons. 
The Decision concerns an authorisation
granted to a Member State upon its own request and does not constitute any
obligation. 
Given the limited scope of the derogation,
the special measure is proportionate to the aim pursued, i.e. to simplify VAT
obligations and VAT collection, as well as combatting tax evasion. 
Choice of instruments
Under Article 395 of the VAT Directive,
derogation from the common VAT rules is only possible on the authority of the
Council acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission. Moreover, a
Council Decision is the most suitable instrument since it can be addressed to
individual Member States. 
4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION
The proposal will have no adverse impact on
the Union's own resources accruing from VAT.
5.           OPTIONAL ELEMENTS
The proposal is limited in time. 
2015/0074 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION
authorising Denmark to introduce a special
measure derogating from Article 75 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, 
Having regard to Council Directive
2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[2], and in particular
Article 395(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,
Whereas:
(1)       By letter registered with
the Commission on 13 January 2015, Denmark requested authorisation to apply a
measure derogating from the provisions of Council Directive 2006/112/EC
governing the right to deduct input VAT.
(2)       The Commission informed
the other Member States of the request made by Denmark by letters dated 13 and
14 February 2015. By letter dated 17 February 2015, the Commission notified
Denmark that it had all the information that it considered necessary to
consider the request.
(3)       Without a derogation
measure as requested, the legislation in Denmark implies that if a light goods
vehicle with a maximum authorised weight of up to three tonnes is registered
with the Danish authorities as being used for business purposes only, the
taxable person is authorised to deduct, in full, the input VAT on the purchase
and running costs of the vehicle. If such a vehicle is subsequently used for
private purposes, the taxable person loses the right to deduct the VAT incurred
on the purchase cost of the vehicle. 
(4)       To mitigate the
consequences of this regime, Denmark has requested authorisation to apply a
special measure derogating from Article 75 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC as
previously granted by Council Implementing Decision 2012/447/EU[3], which expired 31
December 2014. The measure allows taxable persons, who have registered a
vehicle as being for business purposes only, to use the vehicle for
non-business purposes, and to calculate the taxable amount of the deemed supply
pursuant to Article 75 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC on a daily flat-rate
basis, rather than lose their right to deduct the VAT incurred on the purchase
cost of the vehicle. 
(5)       The simplified calculation
method would, however, be limited to twenty days of non-business use for each
calendar year, and the flat-rate amount of VAT to be paid is fixed at DKK 40
for each day of non-business use. This amount has been determined by the Danish
Government on the basis of an analysis of national statistics.
(6)       This measure, which is to
apply to light goods vehicles with a maximum authorised weight of up to three
tonnes, would simplify the VAT obligations of taxable persons who make
occasional non-business use of a vehicle registered for business purposes.
However, it would remain possible for a taxable person to choose to register a
light goods vehicle as being for both business and private use. In doing so,
the taxable person would lose the right to deduct the VAT on the purchase of
the vehicle but would not be required to pay a daily charge for any private
use.
(7)       Allowing a measure which
ensures that a taxable person who makes occasional non-business use of a
vehicle registered for business purposes is not deprived of the full right to
deduct the input VAT on that vehicle would be consistent with the general rules
on deduction as laid down by Council Directive 2006/112/EC. 
(8)       The authorisation should
be valid for a limited period and should therefore expire on 31 December 2017. 
(9)       In the event Denmark
requests a further extension of the derogating measure beyond 2017, a report
shall be submitted to the Commission together with the extension request no
later than 31 March 2017.
(10)     It is considered that the
derogation would only have a negligible effect on the overall amount of tax
revenue collected at the stage of final consumption and will have no adverse
impact on the Union's own resources accruing from VAT.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: 
Article 1
By derogation from Article 75 of Council
Directive 2006/112/EC, where a taxable person uses for private purposes, or
those of his staff, or more generally for purposes other than those of his
business, a light goods vehicle which has been registered as being solely for
business use, Denmark is authorised to determine the taxable amount by
reference to a flat-rate for each day of such use.
The flat-rate per day as referred to in the
first paragraph shall be DKK 40. 
Article 2
The measure referred to in Article 1 shall
only apply to light goods vehicles with a maximum authorised total weight of
three tonnes. 
This measure shall not apply where the
private use exceeds 20 days per calendar year.
Article 3
This Decision shall take effect on the day
of its notification.
This Decision shall expire on 31 December
2017.
Any request for the extension of the
measure provided for in this Decision shall be submitted to the Commission by
31 March 2017.
Such a request shall be accompanied by a
report which includes a review of the measure applied on the basis of this
Decision. 
Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom
of Denmark.
Done at Brussels,
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
[1]               OJ L 202, 28.07.2012, p. 24.
[2]               OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1.
[3]               OJ L 202, 28.07.2012, p. 24