do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 89/686/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation) ( OJ C 445, 12.12.2014 )
Date: 2015-04-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Cenelec, European Committee for Standardisation, European standard, harmonisation of standards, protective equipment, safety standard, technical standard








C_2015113EN.01000601.xml










8.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/6





Corrigendum to Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 89/686/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment
(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 445 of 12 December 2014
)
(2015/C 113/07)
On page 25:

for:











‘CEN


EN 469:2014
Protective clothing for firefighters — Performance requirements for protective clothing for firefighting


12.12.2014


EN 469:2005
Note 2.1


31.1.2015’






read:











‘CEN


EN 469:2005
Protective clothing for firefighters — Performance requirements for protective clothing for firefighting


19.4.2006


EN 469:1995
Note 2.1


Date expired
(30.6.2006)




 


EN 469:2005/A1:2006


23.11.2007


Note 3


Date expired
(23.11.2007)




 


EN 469:2005/AC:2006’
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply
Date: 2015-04-08
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions








C_2015113EN.01000301.xml










8.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/3





Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply
(2015/C 113/04)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (2).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7514 — American Express/Credit Suisse/Swisscard) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-04-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronic commerce, merger control, private bank








C_2015113EN.01000101.xml










8.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7514 — American Express/Credit Suisse/Swisscard)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 113/01)
On 27 March 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7514. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-174/15: Action brought on 08 April 2015— EFB/Commission
Date: 2015-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belgium, Framework Programme for Research and Development, biotechnology, contract terms, law of states, legal expenses








C_2015205EN.01003501.xml










22.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 205/35





Action brought on 08 April 2015— EFB/Commission
(Case T-174/15)
(2015/C 205/47)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Federation of Biotechnology (EFB) (Liège, Belgium) (represented by: M. Troncoso Ferrer and S. Moya Izquierdo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the action admissible and well-founded;










—


order the European Commission to pay the applicant 36  457,79 EUR;










—


condemn the European Commission to pay all the legal costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

Under its claim, the applicant requests the General Court to declare that the European Commission has breached its contractual obligations under the Contract of 24 January 2007 on the project for European Federation of Biotechnology Latin American Action on Functional Foods, with reference CT-2006-043158 (‘the Contract’), and claims for payment of the final amount of 36  457,79 EUR.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment concerning several eligible costs which constitutes an error in the appreciation of proof contrary to Article 1315 of the Belgian Civil Code.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of Articles II.20 and II.6 of the General Conditions of the Contract.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 1134 of the Belgian Civil Code and the principle of execution of contract in good faith.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging a lack of motivation from the European Commission in the refusal to reimburse some costs.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging an infringement of the protection of legitimate expectations.










6.


Sixth plea in law, alleging a lack of clarity in the rules applicable to the 6th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (‘FP6’).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7546 — Apollo/Delta Lloyd) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2015-04-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, investment company, merger control








C_2015113EN.01000102.xml










8.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7546 — Apollo/Delta Lloyd)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 113/02)
On 31 March 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7546. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-04-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015113EN.01000401.xml










8.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/4





Euro exchange rates (1)

2 April 2015
(2015/C 113/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0830




JPY


Japanese yen


129,59




DKK


Danish krone


7,4708




GBP


Pound sterling


0,73160




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3445




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0400




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,6506




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,570




HUF


Hungarian forint


299,58




PLN


Polish zloty


4,0647




RON


Romanian leu


4,4168




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8145




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4343




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3693




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3958




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,4499




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4719




KRW


South Korean won


1 183,31




ZAR


South African rand


12,9950




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,7105




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6303




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 080,56




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9640




PHP


Philippine peso


48,092




RUB


Russian rouble


61,8285




THB


Thai baht


35,187




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4307




MXN


Mexican peso


16,3666




INR


Indian rupee


67,3430






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case F-53/15: Action brought on 8 April 2015 — ZZ v Court of Justice
Date: 2015-04-08
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: allowances and expenses, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_2015190EN.01003901.xml










8.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/39






Action brought on 8 April 2015 — ZZ v Court of Justice
(Case F-53/15)
(2015/C 190/47)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the AECE’s decision establishing the applicant’s rights to reimbursement of the annual travel expenses from the year 2014 onwards, under Article 8 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations, as amended by Regulation No 1023/2013 of the Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013, amending the Staff Regulations and the CEOS.

Form of order sought







—


Declare illegal and inapplicable Article 8 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations;










—


annul the decision fixing the amount of the reimbursement of the annual travel expenses granted to the applicant for the year 2014;










—


order the Court of Justice to pay the costs.
Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran
Date: 2015-04-08
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions








C_2015113EN.01000201.xml










8.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/2





Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran
(2015/C 113/03)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/555 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/548 (4) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran.
The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons designated in the abovementioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 should continue to apply to those persons.
The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).
The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 14 February 2016, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s next review, in accordance with Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, of the list of designated persons.


(1)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51.

(2)  OJ L 92, 8.4.2015, p. 91.

(3)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 92, 8.4.2015, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-04-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015113EN.01000501.xml










8.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/5





Euro exchange rates (1)

2 April 2015
(2015/C 113/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0830




JPY


Japanese yen


129,59




DKK


Danish krone


7,4708




GBP


Pound sterling


0,73160




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3445




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0400




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,6506




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,570




HUF


Hungarian forint


299,58




PLN


Polish zloty


4,0647




RON


Romanian leu


4,4168




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8145




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4343




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3693




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3958




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,4499




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4719




KRW


South Korean won


1 183,31




ZAR


South African rand


12,9950




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,7105




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6303




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 080,56




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9640




PHP


Philippine peso


48,092




RUB


Russian rouble


61,8285




THB


Thai baht


35,187




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4307




MXN


Mexican peso


16,3666




INR


Indian rupee


67,3430






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-178/15: Action brought on 8 April 2015 — Kohrener Landmolkerei and DHG v Commission
Date: 2015-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Austria, admissibility, consumer information, designation of origin, foodstuff, milk, product designation








C_2015245EN.01003001.xml










27.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/30





Action brought on 8 April 2015 — Kohrener Landmolkerei and DHG v Commission
(Case T-178/15)
(2015/C 245/36)
Language of the case: Germany

Parties


Applicants: Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH (Penig, Germany) and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH (Frohburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Wagner, Lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


annul the European Commission’s decision of 2 March 2015;










—


allow the claimants’ opposition of 23 December 2014 in proceedings AT-TSG-0007-01035.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants claim that the contested decision is vitiated by an error of law and should therefore be annulled. Under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 (1), the applicants, as persons lodging a notice of opposition, had a three-month period in which they were required to lodge a notice of opposition with the national authorities if they wished to lodge an opposition to an application for a traditional speciality guaranteed. They state that the publication at issue (OJ 2014 C 340, p. 6) was effected on 30 September 2014 and that on 23 December 2014 the opposition was lodged with the national authorities. The applicants allege that they are not responsible for any subsequent inobservance of a time-limit. They add that they alone cannot influence the timeous action of the competent authority with regard to the forwarding of oppositions to the Commission and that the contested decision did not have regard to the fact that the notice of opposition was lodged in time. That decision had regard only to the date at which the notice was received by the European Commission.
In addition, it is claimed that Article 51 of Regulation No 1151/2012 does not lay down a time-limit for the forwarding of the notice of opposition through a national authority. It is therefore only the applicants’ submission of the notice of opposition to the national authorities which is relevant.


(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1).