do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-157/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) lodged on 3 April 2015 — Samira Achbita, Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding v G4S Secure Solutions NV
Date: 2015-04-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Islam, Muslim, equal treatment, religious discrimination, staff regulations








C_2015205EN.01001702.xml










22.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 205/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) lodged on 3 April 2015 — Samira Achbita, Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding v G4S Secure Solutions NV
(Case C-157/15)
(2015/C 205/24)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Samira Achbita, Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding

Defendant: G4S Secure Solutions NV

Question referred

Should Article 2(2)(a) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC (1) of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation be interpreted as meaning that the prohibition on wearing, as a female Muslim, a headscarf at the workplace does not constitute direct discrimination where the employer’s rule prohibits all employees from wearing outward signs of political, philosophical and religious beliefs at the workplace?


(1)  OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16.
Case C-158/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 3 April 2015 — Elektriciteits Produktiemaatschappij Zuid-Nederland NV v het bestuur van de Nederlandse Emissieautoriteit
Date: 2015-04-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: chemical process, coal, fuel, greenhouse gas, oxide, power plant, tradeable emission permit








C_2015205EN.01001801.xml










22.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 205/18





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 3 April 2015 — Elektriciteits Produktiemaatschappij Zuid-Nederland NV v het bestuur van de Nederlandse Emissieautoriteit
(Case C-158/15)
(2015/C 205/25)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Elektriciteits Produktiemaatschappij Zuid-Nederland NV

Other party: het bestuur van de Nederlandse Emissieautoriteit

Questions referred









1.


Does a situation such as the present, where coal is stored in a coal park where CO2 emissions occur as a result of self-heating, where the centre of the coal park is about 800 meters distant from the edge of the coal-fired power plant, where the two sites are separated from each other by a public road and where the coal is transported from the storage site to the power plant by means of a conveyor belt passing over the road, fall within the scope of the term ‘installation’ as referred to in Article 3(e) of Directive 2003/87/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC?












2.


Does ‘fuel exported from the installation’ in Article 27(2) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 (2) of 21 June 2012 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council refer to a situation such as the present, where coal is lost during storage in the coal park due to combustion resulting from self-heating?






(1)  OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32.

(2)  OJ 2012 L 181, p. 30.