do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/524 of 27 March 2015 correcting the Bulgarian version of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 79/2012 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 concerning administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax
Date: 2015-03-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: VAT, administrative cooperation, data transmission, exchange of information, information network, means of transport, statistics, tax rebate








L_2015084EN.01002201.xml










28.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 84/22








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/524
of 27 March 2015
         
correcting the Bulgarian version of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 79/2012 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 concerning administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 of 7 October 2010 on administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax (1) and, in particular Articles 14, 32, 48 and 49 and Article 51(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Bulgarian version of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 79/2012 (2) contains an error. The words ‘on the territory of the European Union’ need to be deleted from Articles 2 and 3. Therefore a correction of the Bulgarian language version is necessary. The other language versions are not affected.












(2)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Administrative Cooperation,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

(Concerns only the Bulgarian version.)



Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 27 March 2015.


For the Commission


The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 268, 12.10.2010, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 29, 1.2.2012, p. 13.
Case T-139/15: Action brought on 27 March 2015 — Hungary v Commission
Date: 2015-03-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, Hungary, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, industrial restructuring, sugar industry








C_2015190EN.01001701.xml










8.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/17






Action brought on 27 March 2015 — Hungary v Commission
(Case T-139/15)
(2015/C 190/20)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties


Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér, G. Koós and A. Pálfy, Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


Set aside in part Commission Implementing Decision C(2015) 53 of 16 January 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure of the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in so far as, with regard to Hungary, it excludes from European Union financing EUR 1 1 7 09  400 in relation to the sugar restructuring fund.










—


Order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant rejects the requirement which the Commission considers to apply, but which does not appear expressly in the judgment delivered by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Joined Cases C-187/12 and C-189/12 SFIR and Others, according to which the time of presentation of the aid application to which the exclusion contained in the contested decision refers is important for the purposes of examining the applicability of the exceptions contained in the judgment. That conclusion, according to the applicant, is contrary to the logic of the restructuring programme and, moreover, completely overlooks the seasonal nature of sugar production and calls into question the practical applicability of the exceptions.
Furthermore, the applicant considers that, although the Commission’s legal interpretation may be correct, as regards the legislation on restructuring aid — in particular the classification of silos — difficulties of interpretation have arisen, so that, given the uncertainty, the Commission acted in accordance with the law in reducing the amount excluded from European Union financing, having regard to the difficulties of interpretation inherent in the EU legislation, or completely disregarding the exclusion.
Case F-51/15: Action brought on 27 March 2015 — FR v EASA
Date: 2015-03-27
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: damage, damages, probationary period, servant (EU), unfair dismissal








C_2015190EN.01003702.xml










8.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/37






Action brought on 27 March 2015 — FR v EASA
(Case F-51/15)
(2015/C 190/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: FR (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot. lawyers)

Defendant: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to dismiss the applicant at the end of his probationary period and claim for compensation in respect of the material and non-material damage allegedly sustained.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision dated 13 June 2014;










—


in as far as necessary, annul the decision of 18 December 2014;










—


as a consequence, order the compensation of the material prejudice suffered should the applicant not be reintegrated within the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA);










—


order the EASA to pay an indemnity for the moral prejudice suffered, evaluated ex aequo et bono and on a provisional basis at 5  800 euros;










—


order the EASA to bear all the costs.