do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-38/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — Coedo Suárez v Council (Civil Service — Officials — Disciplinary procedure — Disciplinary action — Revocation and reduction of the invalidity allowance — Proportionality of the penalty — Manifest error of assessment — Concept of conduct of the official throughout his career — Adhering to working hours)
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, administrative sanction, disability insurance, disciplinary proceedings, office worker, professional career, working time








C_2015155EN.01004301.xml










11.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/43





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — Coedo Suárez v Council
(Case F-38/14) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Disciplinary procedure - Disciplinary action - Revocation and reduction of the invalidity allowance - Proportionality of the penalty - Manifest error of assessment - Concept of conduct of the official throughout his career - Adhering to working hours))
(2015/C 155/62)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Ángel Coedo Suárez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision of the Secretary General of the Council to impose the penalty of revoking and reducing the invalidity allowance by 15 % until the age of retirement.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Coedo Suárez to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.






(1)  OJ C 212, 7.7.2014, p. 45.
Case C-146/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2015 — J.H. Dees-Erf, other parties: Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, traveller








C_2015198EN.01002202.xml










15.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/22





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2015 — J.H. Dees-Erf, other parties: Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV
(Case C-146/15)
(2015/C 198/30)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: J.H. Dees-Erf

Other parties: Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV

Question referred

Given that Netherlands law provides access to the civil courts to protect the rights which passengers may derive under EU law from Article 5(1)(c) and Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1), does Article 16 of that Regulation oblige the national authorities to take implementing measures which form the basis for administrative enforcement action through the bodies designated under Article 16 separately in each individual case in which Article 5(1)(c) and Article 7 of the Regulation are infringed, in order to be able to guarantee a passenger’s right to compensation separately in each individual case?
Case T-596/13: Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2015 — Emsibeth v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Nael) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Nael — Earlier Community word mark Mc Neal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015155EN.01002601.xml










11.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/26





Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2015 — Emsibeth v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Nael)
(Case T-596/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Nael - Earlier Community word mark Mc Neal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 155/30)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Emsibeth SpA (Verona, Italy) (represented by: A. Arpaia, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Peek & Cloppenburg KG (Dusseldorf, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 September 2013 (Case R 1663/2012-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Peek & Cloppenburg KG and Emsibeth SpA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Emsibeth SpA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.
Case F-32/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — DO v ESMA (Civil service — ESMA staff — Member of the temporary staff — Non-renewal of contract — Staff report — Delay in drawing up staff report — Inconsistency of general and specific assessments)
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: damages, servant (EU), severance pay, staff assessment, work contract








C_2015171EN.01003601.xml










26.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/36





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — DO v ESMA
(Case F-32/14) (1)

((Civil service - ESMA staff - Member of the temporary staff - Non-renewal of contract - Staff report - Delay in drawing up staff report - Inconsistency of general and specific assessments))
(2015/C 171/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: DO (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Securities and Markets Authority (represented by: R. Vasileva, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s temporary agent contract as a consequence of the negative appraisal report, for annulment of the above-mentioned appraisal report and for compensation for the loss suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Declares that DO is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Securities and Markets Authority.






(1)  OJ C 184, 16.6.2014, p. 45.
Case F-26/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — CN v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Request for assistance — Psychological harassment)
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Parliament, European civil service, assistant, legal aid, psychological harassment








C_2015155EN.01004201.xml










11.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/42





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — CN v Parliament
(Case F-26/14) (1)

((Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Request for assistance - Psychological harassment))
(2015/C 155/61)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CN (represented by: L. Levi, C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and S. Alves, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision rejecting the request for assistance brought by the applicant for psychological harassment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1)


Annuls the decision of the European Parliament implicitly rejecting CN’s request for assistance of 13 February 2013;










2)


Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 18 December 2013 dismissing CN’s complaint of 26 August 2013;










3)


Orders the European Parliament to pay CN the sum of EUR 45  785,29;










4)


Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by CN.






(1)  OJ C 175, 10/6/2014, p. 56.
Case C-601/13: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Ambisig — Ambiente e Sistemas de Informação Geográfica SA v Nersant — Associação Empresarial da Região de Santarém, Núcleo Inicial — Formação e Consultoria Lda (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2004/18/EC — Public service contracts — Conduct of the procedure — Contract award criteria — Qualifications of the staff assigned to performance of the contract)
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative competition, award of contract, consultancy, project management, staff assessment








C_2015171EN.01000502.xml










26.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/5





Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Ambisig — Ambiente e Sistemas de Informação Geográfica SA v Nersant — Associação Empresarial da Região de Santarém, Núcleo Inicial — Formação e Consultoria Lda
(Case C-601/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2004/18/EC - Public service contracts - Conduct of the procedure - Contract award criteria - Qualifications of the staff assigned to performance of the contract))
(2015/C 171/07)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ambisig — Ambiente e Sistemas de Informação Geográfica SA

Defendants: Nersant — Associação Empresarial da Região de Santarém, Núcleo Inicial — Formação e Consultoria Lda

Operative part of the judgment

With regard to procurement contracts for the provision of services of an intellectual nature, training and consultancy, Article 53(1)(a) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts does not preclude the contracting authority from using a criterion enabling evaluation of the teams specifically put forward by the tenderers for the performance of the contract and which takes into consideration the composition of the team and the experience and academic and professional background of the team members.


(1)  OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.
Case C-147/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 26 March 2015 — Provincia di Bari v Edilizia Mastrodonato S.r.l.
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: prevention of pollution, storage of waste, waste, waste disposal, waste recycling








C_2015205EN.01001601.xml










22.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 205/16





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 26 March 2015 — Provincia di Bari v Edilizia Mastrodonato S.r.l.
(Case C-147/15)
(2015/C 205/21)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Provincia di Bari

Respondent: Edilizia Mastrodonato S.r.l.

Question referred

Must Article 10(2) of Directive 2006/21/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that backfilling with waste — if carried out using waste other than extractive waste — must be subject to the legislation regarding waste set out in Directive 1999/31/EC (2) even when the operation does not consist of the disposal of waste but of recovery?


(1)  Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste from extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC — Statement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 15).

(2)  Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste (OJ 1999 L 182, p. 1).
Case C-279/13: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen — Sweden) — C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Information society — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Article 3(2) — Direct broadcast of a sporting fixture on an internet site)
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Sweden, access to information, copyright, interpretation of the law








C_2015171EN.01000201.xml










26.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/2





Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen — Sweden) — C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg
(Case C-279/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Copyright and related rights - Directive 2001/29/EC - Information society - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights - Article 3(2) - Direct broadcast of a sporting fixture on an internet site))
(2015/C 171/02)
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta domstolen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: C More Entertainment AB

Defendant: Linus Sandberg

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation extending the exclusive right of the broadcasting organisations referred to in Article 3(2)(d) as regards acts of communication to the public which broadcasts of sporting fixtures made live on internet, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, may constitute, provided that such an extension does not undermine the protection of copyright.


(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015099EN.01000201.xml










26.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 99/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

25 March 2015
(2015/C 99/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0985




JPY


Japanese yen


131,13




DKK


Danish krone


7,4688




GBP


Pound sterling


0,73650




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3026




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0517




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,5930




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,378




HUF


Hungarian forint


298,80




PLN


Polish zloty


4,0858




RON


Romanian leu


4,4147




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8089




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3925




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3711




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5191




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,4322




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5023




KRW


South Korean won


1 208,22




ZAR


South African rand


12,9574




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,8244




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6518




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 242,59




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,0271




PHP


Philippine peso


49,163




RUB


Russian rouble


62,5738




THB


Thai baht


35,715




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4334




MXN


Mexican peso


16,3611




INR


Indian rupee


68,5150






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Special Report No 3/2015 ‘EU Youth Guarantee: first steps taken but implementation risks ahead’
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU programme, project evaluation, youth policy








C_2015099EN.01000301.xml










26.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 99/3





Special Report No 3/2015 ‘EU Youth Guarantee: first steps taken but implementation risks ahead’
(2015/C 99/03)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 3/2015 ‘EU Youth Guarantee: first steps taken but implementation risks ahead’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu
A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:





European Court of Auditors




Publications (PUB)




12, rue Alcide De Gasperi




1615 Luxembourg




LUXEMBOURG




Tel. +352 4398-1




E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu




or by filling in an electronic order form on EU Bookshop.
Case C-556/13: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 March 2015 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania)) — ‘Litaksa’ UAB v ‘BTA Insurance Company’ SE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 90/232/EEC — Article 2 — Differentiation in the amount of the insurance premium depending on the territory in which the vehicle is used)
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Lithuania, compulsory insurance, equal treatment, free movement of persons, insurance contract, insured risk, interpretation of the law, personal accident insurance








C_2015171EN.01000401.xml










26.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/4





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 March 2015 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania)) — ‘Litaksa’ UAB v ‘BTA Insurance Company’ SE
(Case C-556/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 90/232/EEC - Article 2 - Differentiation in the amount of the insurance premium depending on the territory in which the vehicle is used))
(2015/C 171/05)
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant:‘Litaksa’ UAB

Defendant:‘BTA Insurance Company’ SE

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2 of the Third Council Directive 90/232/EEC of 14 May 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, as amended by Directive 2005/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005, must be interpreted as meaning that a premium which varies according to whether the insured vehicle is to be used only in the territory of the Member State in which that vehicle is normally based or in the entire territory of the European Union does not fall within the concept of ‘single premium’, within the meaning of that article.


(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7544 — Centerbridge/Senvion)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, processing industry, turbine








C_2015099EN.01000101.xml










26.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 99/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7544 — Centerbridge/Senvion)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 99/01)
On 19 March 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7544. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-143/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2015 — G.E. Security BV; other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, electrical engineering, specification of tariff heading, telephone, video communications








C_2015198EN.01002101.xml










15.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/21





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2015 — G.E. Security BV; other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën
(Case C-143/15)
(2015/C 198/27)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: G.E. Security BV

Other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Question referred

Should headings 8517, 8521, 8531 and 8543 of the Combined Nomenclature be interpreted as meaning that a product such as a video multiplexer — which was developed to form part of a system which is able to analyse images and sounds derived from cameras and alarm sensors connected to it, and which, if required, records, stores, processes and displays images and sounds on a monitor connected to it, and/or which, when the images or sounds so warrant, emits a warning signal in the form of an e-mail to one or more of the users connected to the system, and/or which can activate devices which emit sound or light signals — is to be classified under one of those headings?
Case C-7/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co KG v European Commission (Appeal — Community Customs Code — Articles 220(2) and 239 — Refund of import duties — Import of preserved mushrooms from China — Decision declaring the refund of import duties unjustified)
Date: 2015-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, Germany, customs regulations, exemption from customs duties, mushroom-growing, preserved product








C_2015171EN.01000601.xml










26.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/6





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co KG v European Commission
(Case C-7/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community Customs Code - Articles 220(2) and 239 - Refund of import duties - Import of preserved mushrooms from China - Decision declaring the refund of import duties unjustified))
(2015/C 171/08)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co KG (represented by: K. Landry and G. Schwendinger, Rechtsanwalte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.14.