do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7508 — DCC Energy/Esso SAF)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2015-03-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy industry, merger control, petroleum product








C_2015097EN.01000101.xml










24.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 97/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7508 — DCC Energy/Esso SAF)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 97/01)
On 12 March 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7508. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case F-47/15: Action brought on 24 March 2015 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2015-03-24
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: damages, dependant, family benefit, married person, servant (EU)








C_2015190EN.01003501.xml










8.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/35






Action brought on 24 March 2015 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-47/15)
(2015/C 190/41)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to uphold the application for the retroactive grant of the dependent child allowance in respect of the two children of the applicant’s spouse, who live at her home every second week, with effect from the date of their marriage and payment of compensation.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of 9 December 2014, notified on 16 December 2014, but only in so far as the Appointing Authority, after having upheld the claim in this regard and correctly decided to annul the decision of 19 June 2014 and therefore to grant her the dependent child allowance and the derived allowances, decided none the less not to grant the allowances in question retroactively from the date of her marriage, awarding the right to the dependent child allowance and the derived allowances only with effect from 1 March 2014, namely the first day of the month during which the applicant applied for review;










—


In any event, order the defendant, as compensation and under the unlimited jurisdiction of the Tribunal, to pay the sum of EUR 33  375,99, with the right reserved to increase that sum during the proceedings, in compensation for the harm caused by the wrongful conduct of the defendant, together with default interest at the statutory rate as applied in Belgium for the years in question from 1 September 2011 until the date of payment in full;










—


In any event, order the defendant to pay all the costs, in accordance with Article 87(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal.
Case F-61/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single judge) of 24 March 2015 — Maggiulli v Commission (Civil service — Promotion — 2013 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote — Consideration of comparative merits)
Date: 2015-03-24
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: pay, promotion, servant (EU)








C_2015146EN.01004601.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/46





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single judge) of 24 March 2015 — Maggiulli v Commission
(Case F-61/14) (1)

((Civil service - Promotion - 2013 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote - Consideration of comparative merits))
(2015/C 146/62)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Carola Maggiulli (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 13 in the 2013 promotion exercise.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the application;










2.


Orders Mrs Maggiulli to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 421, 24.11.2014, p. 61.