do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-65/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission (Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings — Failure to designate a new representative — Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: damages, indemnification, legal expenses, redemption








C_2015146EN.01004801.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/48





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-65/13) (1)

((Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings - Failure to designate a new representative - Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 146/65)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A., lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the rejection of the applicant’s claim addressed to the Commission seeking payment by the Commission of the sum of EUR 10  000 on account of the harm purportedly suffered by the applicant as a result of a letter informing him, inter alia, that the Commission had set off his applications for costs, which the Commission had been ordered to pay, against sums owed by the applicant to the Commission.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case F-65/13 Marcuccio v Commission.










2.


Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 377, 21.12.2013, p. 24.
Case T-256/12: Order of the General Court of 19 March 2015 — Hautau v Commission
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: bolt and screw industry, glass, restriction on competition








C_2015178EN.01002401.xml










1.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/24





Order of the General Court of 19 March 2015 — Hautau v Commission
(Case T-256/12) (1)

(2015/C 178/24)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
Case F-62/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission (Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings — Failure to designate a new representative — Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, deduction at source, disability insurance








C_2015146EN.01004702.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/47





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-62/13) (1)

((Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings - Failure to designate a new representative - Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 146/64)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A., lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to withhold the sum of EUR 500 and five further sums in the amount of EUR 504,67 from the applicant’s invalidity allowance for the months July to December 2012 respectively.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case F-62/13 Marcuccio v Commission.










2.


Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013, p. 26.
Case C-426/14: Order of the President of the Court of 19 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte — Italy) — Heart Life Croce Amica Srl v Regione Piemonte
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, negotiated contract, overheads, principle of proportionality, unpaid work, voluntary organisation








C_2015213EN.01002201.xml










29.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/22





Order of the President of the Court of 19 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte — Italy) — Heart Life Croce Amica Srl v Regione Piemonte
(Case C-426/14) (1)

(2015/C 213/38)
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 431, 1.12.2014.
Case T-412/13: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2015 — Chin Haur Indonesia v Council (Dumping — Imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia — Extension to such imports of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of bicycles originating in China — Circumvention — Failure to cooperate — Articles 13 and 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment)
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Indonesia, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2015146EN.01003801.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/38





Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2015 — Chin Haur Indonesia v Council
(Case T-412/13) (1)

((Dumping - Imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia - Extension to such imports of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of bicycles originating in China - Circumvention - Failure to cooperate - Articles 13 and 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Error of assessment))
(2015/C 146/51)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Chin Haur Indonesia, PT (Tangerang, Indonesia) (represented by: T. Müller-Ibold and F.-C. Laprévote, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert, Agent, and by R. Bierwagen, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and M. França, Agents); and Maxcom Ltd (Plovdiv, Bulgaria) (represented by: L. Ruessmann, lawyer, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Re:

Application for the partial annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 of 29 May 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 on imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not (OJ 2013 L 153, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Annuls Article 1(1) and (3) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 of 29 May 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 on imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not, to the extent that it concerns Chin Haur Indonesia, PT;










2)


Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs incurred by Chin Haur Indonesia and to bear its own costs;










3)


Orders the European Commission and Maxcom Ltd to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.
Case F-45/15: Action brought on 19 March 2015 — ZZ v Europol
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: job access, servant (EU), work contract








C_2015190EN.01003401.xml










8.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/34






Action brought on 19 March 2015 — ZZ v Europol
(Case F-45/15)
(2015/C 190/39)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the implied decision of the defendant not to respond to the applicant’s request for a contract for an indefinite period.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the implied rejection decision taken by the defendant on 31 May 2014 and the decision rejecting the applicant’s claim dated 22 December 2014 both refusing him a contract for an indefinite period;










—


In consequence, and principally, declare that, at the end of the contract currently running, the applicant will be offered a contract for an indefinite period;










—


In the alternative, if it were to prove appropriate to take account only of the sole contract concluded under the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the EU (CEOS), declare that the applicant will be offered a second fixed-term contract under CEOS by Europol at the end of the contract currently running;










—


Order the defendant to pay all the costs of the proceedings.
Notice for the attention of a person subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2015092EN.01000101.xml










19.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 92/1





Notice for the attention of a person subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria
(2015/C 92/01)
The following information is brought to the attention of Mr Amr Armanazi (a.k.a. Amr Muhammad Najib Al-Armanazi, Amr Najib Armanazi, Amrou Al-Armanazy), a person appearing in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP (1) and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.
The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned person with a new statement of reasons. Mr Armanazi is hereby informed that he may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statement of reasons before 27 March 2015, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu






(1)  OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.

(2)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.
Notice of open competition
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, competition (EU)








C_2015092EN.01003001.xml










19.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 92/30





NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION
(2015/C 92/04)
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition
EPSO/AD/301/15 — ADMINISTRATORS (AD 5)
The competition notice will be published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 92 A of 19 March 2015
.
Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/
Case F-90/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission (Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings — Failure to designate a new representative — Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: damages, indemnification, lawyer, protection of communications








C_2015146EN.01004901.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/49





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-90/13) (1)

((Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings - Failure to designate a new representative - Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 146/67)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A., lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s requests for compensation for the harm suffered as a result of the infringement alleged of the applicant’s right to confidentiality caused by the defendant’s sending a letter concerning him to a lawyer who did not represent him.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case F-90/13 Marcuccio v Commission.










2.


Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014, p. 40.
Case C-134/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 March 2015 — Lidl Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. KG v Freistaat Sachsen
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, common organisation of markets, consumer information, equal treatment, labelling, poultrymeat, retail trade, right of establishment, right to work








C_2015205EN.01001501.xml










22.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 205/15





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 March 2015 — Lidl Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. KG v Freistaat Sachsen
(Case C-134/15)
(2015/C 205/20)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Lidl Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. KG

Respondent: Freistaat Sachsen

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 5(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 (1) compatible with the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), in conjunction with Articles 15(1) and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?










2.


Is Article 5(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 compatible with the second subparagraph of Article 40(2) TFEU?






(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 of 16 June 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards the marketing standards for poultrymeat (OJ 2008 L 157, p. 46).
Case T-413/13: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2015 — City Cycle Industries v Council (Dumping — Imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia — Extension to such imports of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of bicycles originating in China — Circumvention — Failure to cooperate — Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Equal treatment — Access to the file)
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Sri Lanka, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2015146EN.01003802.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/38





Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2015 — City Cycle Industries v Council
(Case T-413/13) (1)

((Dumping - Imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia - Extension to such imports of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of bicycles originating in China - Circumvention - Failure to cooperate - Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Error of assessment - Equal treatment - Access to the file))
(2015/C 146/52)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: City Cycle Industries (Colombo, Sri Lanka) (represented by: T. Müller-Ibold and F.-C. Laprévote, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert, Agent, and by R. Bierwagen and C. Hipp, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and M. França, Agents); and Maxcom Ltd (Plovdiv, Bulgaria) (represented by: L. Ruessmann, lawyer, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Re:

Application for the partial annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 of 29 May 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 on imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not (OJ 2013 L 153, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Annuls Article 1(1) and (3) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 of 29 May 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 on imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not, to the extent that it concerns City Cycle Industries;










2)


Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs incurred by City Cycle Industries and to bear its own costs;










3)


Orders the European Commission and Maxcom Ltd to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015092EN.01000201.xml










19.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 92/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

18 March 2015
(2015/C 92/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0592




JPY


Japanese yen


128,35




DKK


Danish krone


7,4591




GBP


Pound sterling


0,72300




SEK


Swedish krona


9,3325




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0627




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,9000




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,318




HUF


Hungarian forint


304,00




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1466




RON


Romanian leu


4,4493




TRY


Turkish lira


2,7793




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3901




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3583




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2178




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,4461




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4735




KRW


South Korean won


1 196,29




ZAR


South African rand


13,1048




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,5982




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6460




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


13 956,88




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9292




PHP


Philippine peso


47,496




RUB


Russian rouble


64,9000




THB


Thai baht


34,878




BRL


Brazilian real


3,4283




MXN


Mexican peso


16,3169




INR


Indian rupee


66,4754






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-286/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Dole Food Company, Inc., Dole Fresh Fruit Europe, formerly Dole Germany OHG v European Commission (Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European banana market — Coordination in the setting of quotation prices — Obligation to state reasons — Belated statement of reasons — Belated submission of evidence — Rights of defence — Principle of equality of arms — Principles governing the establishment of the facts — Distortion of the facts — Assessment of the evidence — Market structure — Requirement for the Commission to specify those aspects of the exchange of information which constitute a restriction of competition by object — Burden of proof — Calculation of the fine — Whether sales made by subsidiaries not involved in the infringement are to be taken into account — Sales of the same bananas counted twice)
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU market, cartel, competition policy, equal treatment, fine, reference price, right to justice, rights of the defence, sale, subsidiary, tropical fruit








C_2015155EN.01000301.xml










11.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/3





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Dole Food Company, Inc., Dole Fresh Fruit Europe, formerly Dole Germany OHG v European Commission
(Case C-286/13 P) (1)

((Appeals - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European banana market - Coordination in the setting of quotation prices - Obligation to state reasons - Belated statement of reasons - Belated submission of evidence - Rights of defence - Principle of equality of arms - Principles governing the establishment of the facts - Distortion of the facts - Assessment of the evidence - Market structure - Requirement for the Commission to specify those aspects of the exchange of information which constitute a restriction of competition by object - Burden of proof - Calculation of the fine - Whether sales made by subsidiaries not involved in the infringement are to be taken into account - Sales of the same bananas counted twice))
(2015/C 155/03)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Dole Food Company, Inc., Dole Fresh Fruit Europe, formerly Dole Germany OHG (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Kellerbauer and P. Van Nuffel, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the appeal;










2)


Orders Dole Food Company, Inc., and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe, formerly Dole Germany OHG, to bear the costs jointly and severally.






(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.