do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7507 — Wärtsilä/L-3 MSI) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy industry, merger control, shipbuilding








C_2015092EN.01003701.xml










19.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 92/37





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.7507 — Wärtsilä/L-3 MSI)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 92/11)






1.


On 11 March 2015, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Wärtsilä Corporation (‘Wärtsilä’, Finland) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of the business unit L-3 Marine Systems International (‘L-3 MSI’, Finland) by way of purchase of shares. L-3 MSI consists of L-3 Communications Dynamic Positioning and Control Systems, Inc. (USA), L-3 G.A. International, Inc. (USA), Funa International, Inc. (USA), SAM Electronics GmbH (Germany), L-3 Communications ELAC Nautik GmbH (Germany), JOVYATLAS EUROATLAS Gesellschaft für Leistungselektronik GmbH, (Germany), L-3 Communications Marine Holdings AS (Norway) and L-3 Communications Valmarine AS (Norway).










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Wärtsilä: Wärtsilä supplies ship power for builders, owners and operators of vessels and offshore installations. It has a global service network for customers' ship machinery at every life cycle stage and it is a provider of power plants, operations and lifetime care services in decentralised power generation,
—   for L-3 MSI: L-3 MSI is active in the supply of complete marine electrical systems as well as integrated navigation, automation, communication, energy distribution and propulsion systems.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number M.7507 — Wärtsilä/L-3 MSI to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case C-182/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Application for registration of the Community word mark MAGNEXT — Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier national word mark MAGNET 4 — Likelihood of confusion)
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2015155EN.01000601.xml










11.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/6





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Case C-182/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Application for registration of the Community word mark MAGNEXT - Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier national word mark MAGNET 4 - Likelihood of confusion))
(2015/C 155/07)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug (represented by: A. Nordemann and M. Maier, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Sets aside paragraph 4 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Mega Brands v OHIM — Diset (MAGNEXT) (T-604/11 and T-292/12, EU:T:2014:56);










2)


Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;










3)


Reserves the costs.






(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Case F-58/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission (Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings — Failure to designate a new representative — Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: indemnification, lawyer, protection of privacy








C_2015146EN.01004701.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/47





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-58/13) (1)

((Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings - Failure to designate a new representative - Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 146/63)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A., lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request for compensation for the harm suffered as a result of the infringement alleged of the applicant’s right to confidentiality caused by the defendant’s sending a letter concerning him to a lawyer who did not represent him.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case F-58/13 Marcuccio v Commission.










2.


Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013, p. 26.
Case T-129/15: Action brought on 19 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (WAVE 2 PAY)
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Italy, electronic banking, electronic money, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015155EN.01003501.xml










11.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/35





Action brought on 19 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (WAVE 2 PAY)
(Case T-129/15)
(2015/C 155/41)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and F. Cecchi, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘WAVE 2 PAY’ — Application for registration No 12 258 117

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 January 2015 in Case R 1857/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that there was a breach and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


declare that there was a breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009, and also that there were contradictions in the contested decision; and consequently






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.









Pleas in law







—


Breach of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt apply
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Egypt, data transmission, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, personal data, recruitment








C_2015095EN.01001801.xml










21.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/18





Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt apply
(2015/C 95/07)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (2).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 270/2011.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).
Personal data will be retained for five years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
Case F-89/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission (Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings — Failure to designate a new representative — Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: disability insurance, servant (EU)








C_2015146EN.01004802.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/48





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-89/13) (1)

((Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings - Failure to designate a new representative - Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 146/66)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A., lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to withhold the sum of EUR 504,67 from the applicant’s invalidity allowance for the each of the three months from January to March 2013.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case F-89/13 Marcuccio v Commission.










2.


Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014, p. 39.
Case T-130/15: Action brought on 19 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (WAVE TO PAY)
Date: 2015-03-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, electronic banking, electronic money, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015155EN.01003502.xml










11.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/35





Action brought on 19 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (WAVE TO PAY)
(Case T-130/15)
(2015/C 155/42)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and F. Cecchi, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘WAVE TO PAY’ — Application for registration No 12 258 141

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 January 2015 in Case R 1864/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that there was a breach and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


declare that there was a breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009, and also that there were contradictions in the contested decision; and consequently






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.









Pleas in law

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-129/15.