do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 65/2014 of 1 October 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the energy labelling of domestic ovens and range hoods ( OJ L 29, 31.1.2014 )
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: consumer information, eco-label, electrical energy, energy efficiency, energy saving, furnace, gas, household electrical appliance, technical specification




L_2015061EN.01002601.xml










5.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 61/26







Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 65/2014 of 1 October 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the energy labelling of domestic ovens and range hoods

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 29 of 31 January 2014
)


On page 9, Annex II, the equation in point 2.1(i) should read as follows:


                  ‘
                  


                  ’
Case C-220/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 2015 — Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz and Others v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against certain persons in view of the situation in Egypt — Freezing of the funds of persons subject to judicial proceedings for misappropriation of State funds — United Nations Convention against Corruption)
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Egypt, breach of trust, corruption, economic sanctions, international sanctions, public finance, public prosecution








C_2015138EN.01002201.xml










27.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/22





Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 2015 — Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz and Others v Council of the European Union, European Commission
(Case C-220/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Restrictive measures taken against certain persons in view of the situation in Egypt - Freezing of the funds of persons subject to judicial proceedings for misappropriation of State funds - United Nations Convention against Corruption))
(2015/C 138/29)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz, Abla Mohammed Fawzi Ali Ahmed, Khadiga Ahmed Ahmed Kamel Yassin, Shahinaz Abdel Azizabdel Wahab Al Naggar (represented by: J. Lewis QC, B. Kennelly and J. Pobjoy, Barristers, and J. Binns, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and I. Gurov, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and D. Gauci, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the appeal;










2)


Orders Mr Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz, Ms Abla Mohammed Fawzi Ali Ahmed, Ms Khadiga Ahmed Ahmed Kamel Yassin and Ms Shahinaz Abdel Azizabdel Wahab Al Naggar to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015077EN.01000201.xml










5.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 77/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

4 March 2015
(2015/C 77/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1124




JPY


Japanese yen


133,15




DKK


Danish krone


7,4575




GBP


Pound sterling


0,72590




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2379




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0694




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,6145




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,464




HUF


Hungarian forint


306,47




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1727




RON


Romanian leu


4,4555




TRY


Turkish lira


2,8317




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4191




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3922




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6266




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,4650




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5207




KRW


South Korean won


1 222,39




ZAR


South African rand


13,1071




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


6,9734




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6600




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 455,64




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,0629




PHP


Philippine peso


49,082




RUB


Russian rouble


68,6340




THB


Thai baht


36,036




BRL


Brazilian real


3,2999




MXN


Mexican peso


16,7283




INR


Indian rupee


69,2626






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Joined Cases C-93/13 P and C-123/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 2015 — European Commission v Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA, Eni SpA and Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA, Eni SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Chloroprene rubber market — Succession of production entities — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Repeated infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction)
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cartel, competition policy, equal treatment, fine, fixing of prices, market-sharing agreement, principle of proportionality, synthetic rubber








C_2015138EN.01000401.xml










27.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/4





Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 2015 — European Commission v Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA, Eni SpA and Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA, Eni SpA v European Commission
(Joined Cases C-93/13 P and C-123/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Chloroprene rubber market - Succession of production entities - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Fines - Repeated infringement - Unlimited jurisdiction))
(2015/C 138/03)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


(C-93/13 P)


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and R. Striani, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA, Eni SpA (represented by: M. Siragusa, G.M. Roberti, F. Moretti, I. Perego, F. Cannizzaro, A. Bardanzellu, D. Durante, and V. Laroccia, avvocati)

(C-123/13 P)


Appellants: Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA, Eni SpA (represented by: M. Siragusa, G.M. Roberti, F. Moretti, I. Perego, F. Cannizzaro, A. Bardanzellu, D. Durante, and V. Laroccia, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and R. Striani, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Rejects the appeals in Cases C-93/13 P and C-123/13 P;










2)


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs relating to the appeal in Case C-93/13 P;










3)


Orders Versalis SpA and Eni SpA to pay the costs relating to the appeal in Case C-123/13 P.






(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.

OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.
Case C-175/14: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Ralph Prankl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Directive 92/12/EEC — General arrangements for products subject to excise duty — Imposition of duty on smuggled goods — Goods released for consumption in one Member State and transported to another Member State — Determination of the competent Member State — Right of the transit State to impose duty on those goods)
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative formalities, carriage of goods, excise duty, free circulation, illicit trade, import (EU), interpretation of the law, land transport








C_2015138EN.01002101.xml










27.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/21





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Ralph Prankl
(Case C-175/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Directive 92/12/EEC - General arrangements for products subject to excise duty - Imposition of duty on smuggled goods - Goods released for consumption in one Member State and transported to another Member State - Determination of the competent Member State - Right of the transit State to impose duty on those goods))
(2015/C 138/27)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Party to the main proceedings

Ralph Prankl

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1) and (2) and Article 9(1) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products, as amended by Council Directive 92/108/EEC of 14 December 1992, must be interpreted as meaning that, where goods subject to excise duty that have been smuggled into the territory of a Member State are transported, without the accompanying document prescribed in Article 7(4) of that directive, to another Member State, in the territory of which those goods are discovered by the competent authorities, the transit Member States are not permitted also to levy excise duty on the driver of the heavy goods vehicle who transported them for having held those goods for commercial purposes in their territory.


(1)  OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.
Case C-178/14: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Vario Tek GmbH v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union and Common Customs Tariff — Combined nomenclature — Tariff classification — Heading 8525 80 — Television cameras, digital cameras and video camera recorders — Subheadings 8525 80 91 and 8525 80 99 — Video cameras integrated into sports goggles — ‘Optical zoom’ function — Recording of files from external sources)
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, EU law - national law, classification, common customs tariff, interpretation of the law, recording equipment, sports equipment








C_2015138EN.01002102.xml










27.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/21





Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Vario Tek GmbH v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf
(Case C-178/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union and Common Customs Tariff - Combined nomenclature - Tariff classification - Heading 8525 80 - Television cameras, digital cameras and video camera recorders - Subheadings 8525 80 91 and 8525 80 99 - Video cameras integrated into sports goggles - ‘Optical zoom’ function - Recording of files from external sources))
(2015/C 138/28)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Vario Tek GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf

Operative part of the judgment







1)


The Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version resulting from Commission Regulation (EU) No 1006/2011 of 27 September 2011, must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that video cameras integrated into sport goggles, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, do not have an ‘optical zoom’ function, does not prevent their classification under subheadings 8525 80 91 and 8525 80 99 of that nomenclature.










2)


The Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Regulation No 2658/87, in the version resulting from Regulation No 1006/2011, must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that video cameras integrated in sports goggles, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, offer the possibility to record and store on an interchangeable storage medium video and audio files from an external source precludes their classification under subheading 8525 80 91 of that nomenclature if that recording may be made independently and without relying on external materials or software.






(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Case T-458/12: Order of the General Court of 5 March 2015 — Générations futures v Commission
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrative procedure, market approval, plant health control








C_2015146EN.01004201.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/42





Order of the General Court of 5 March 2015 — Générations futures v Commission
(Case T-458/12) (1)

(2015/C 146/56)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 389, 15.12.2012.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), man-made fibre, originating product








C_2015077EN.01000901.xml










5.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 77/9





Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2015/C 77/08)
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.
Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1000 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





High tenacity yarn of polyesters


The People’s Republic of China


Anti-dumping duty


Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1105/2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of high tenacity yarn of polyester originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 315, 1.12.2010, p. 1).


2.12.2015






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Case C-502/13: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2015 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Application of a reduced rate — Supply of digital books or electronic books)
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Luxembourg, VAT rate, book trade, electronic publishing








C_2015138EN.01000901.xml










27.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/9





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2015 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
(Case C-502/13) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation - VAT - Application of a reduced rate - Supply of digital books or electronic books))
(2015/C 138/10)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: C. Soulay and F. Dintilhac, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: D. Holderer, acting as Agent)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Chatziioakeimidou and A. de Gregorio Merino, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: M. Jacobs and J.-C. Halleux, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






(1)


Declares that, by applying a rate of value added tax of 3 % to the supply of digital or electronic books, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 96 to 99, 110 and 114 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax as amended by Council Directive 2010/88/EU of 7 December 2010, read in conjunction with Annexes II and III to that directive and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 of 15 March 2011 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2006/112/EC;










(2)


Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










(3)


Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, France, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2015077EN.01000501.xml










5.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 77/5





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2015/C 77/04)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


16.1.2015




Duration


16.1-31.12.2015




Member State


France




Stock or Group of stocks


ANF/8C3411




Species


Anglerfish (Lophiidae)




Zone


VIIIc, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


01/TQ104






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case T-233/14: Order of the General Court of 5 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (NEXTCARD) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark NEXTCARD — Partial refusal of registration by the examiner — Obligation to state reasons — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Italy, banking, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015138EN.01005101.xml










27.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/51





Order of the General Court of 5 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (NEXTCARD)
(Case T-233/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark NEXTCARD - Partial refusal of registration by the examiner - Obligation to state reasons - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2015/C 138/67)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi, G. Ghisletti and F. Braga, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 February 2014 (Case R 1807/2013-5) concerning an application for registration of the word sign NEXTCARD as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Intesa Sanpaolo SpA shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.
Case F-97/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2015 — Gyarmathy v FRA (Civil service — Staff of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Notice of vacancy — Rejection of candidature)
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, administrative procedure, appointment of staff, damages, indemnification








C_2015146EN.01004302.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/43





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2015 — Gyarmathy v FRA
(Case F-97/13) (1)

((Civil service - Staff of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights - Members of the temporary staff - Recruitment - Notice of vacancy - Rejection of candidature))
(2015/C 146/58)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Valéria Anna Gyarmathy (Győr, Hungary) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (represented by: M. Kjærum, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision to appoint another candidate to the position of ‘Senior Programme Manager’ and not to appoint the applicant to the second position referred to in the vacancy notice.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Declares that Ms Gyarmathy is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.






(1)  OJ C 85, 22.3.2014, p. 26.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2015-03-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, plastics








C_2015077EN.01000801.xml










5.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 77/8





Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2015/C 77/07)
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.
Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1000 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than 3 months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Polyethylene terephthalate


The People’s Republic of China


Anti-dumping duty


Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1030/2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 300, 17.11.2010, p. 1).


18.11.2015






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.