do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-369/13: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Oost-Brabant, zittingsplaats ’s-Hertogenbosch — Netherlands) — Criminal proceedings against N.F. Gielen, M.M.J. Geerings, F.A.C. Pruijmboom, A.A. Pruijmboom, (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Drug precursors — Monitoring of trade between the Member States — Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 — Monitoring of trade between the European Union and third countries — Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 — Concept of ‘scheduled substance’  — Substance ‘alpha-phenylacetoacetonitrile’ (APAAN) — Scheduled substance ‘1-phenyl-2-propanone’ (BMK))
Date: 2015-02-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cataloguing, drug addiction, drug traffic, market supervision, psychotropic substance, third country, trade relations








C_2015118EN.01000501.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/5





Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Oost-Brabant, zittingsplaats ’s-Hertogenbosch — Netherlands) — Criminal proceedings against N.F. Gielen, M.M.J. Geerings, F.A.C. Pruijmboom, A.A. Pruijmboom,
(Case C-369/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Drug precursors - Monitoring of trade between the Member States - Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 - Monitoring of trade between the European Union and third countries - Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 - Concept of ‘scheduled substance’ - Substance ‘alpha-phenylacetoacetonitrile’ (APAAN) - Scheduled substance ‘1-phenyl-2-propanone’ (BMK)))
(2015/C 118/07)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Oost-Brabant, zittingsplaats ’s-Hertogenbosch

Parties in the main criminal proceedings

N.F. Gielen, M.M.J. Geerings, F.A.C. Pruijmboom, A.A. Pruijmboom,

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors and Article 2(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 of 22 December 2004 laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Community and third countries in drug precursors must be interpreted as meaning that the classification of ‘scheduled substance’, within the meaning of those provisions, does not apply to a substance, such as alpha-phenylacetoacetonitrile, which is not referred to in Annex I to Regulation No 273/2004 or the Annex to Regulation No 111/2005, even if it may, by readily applicable or economically viable means, within the meaning of those regulations, easily be converted into a substance referred to in those annexes.


(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.
Case C-457/14: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Claudia Concu, Isabella Melis (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure — Identical questions referred — Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Games of chance — National legislation — Reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates — New call for tenders — Licences with a shorter period than that of licences awarded in the past — Restriction — Overriding reasons of general interest — Proportionality)
Date: 2015-02-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, award of contract, equal treatment, freedom to provide services, invitation to tender, right of establishment








C_2015127EN.01000401.xml










20.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 127/4





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Claudia Concu, Isabella Melis
(Case C-457/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Identical questions referred - Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Games of chance - National legislation - Reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences with a shorter period than that of licences awarded in the past - Restriction - Overriding reasons of general interest - Proportionality))
(2015/C 127/05)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari

Criminal proceedings against

Claudia Concu, Isabella Melis

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that in issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders relating to licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past due to a reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates.


(1)  OJ C 439, 8.12.2014.
Case C-480/14: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Società Sogno di Tolosa Ltd and Others v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli di Stato (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure — Identical questions referred — Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Games of chance — National legislation — Reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates — New call for tenders — Licences with a shorter period than that of licences awarded in the past — Restriction — Overriding reasons of general interest — Proportionality)
Date: 2015-02-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, award of contract, invitation to tender, transparency in decision-making








C_2015127EN.01000502.xml










20.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 127/5





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Società Sogno di Tolosa Ltd and Others v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli di Stato
(Case C-480/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Identical questions referred - Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Games of chance - National legislation - Reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences with a shorter period than that of licences awarded in the past - Restriction - Overriding reasons of general interest - Proportionality))
(2015/C 127/07)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Società Sogno di Tolosa Limited, Ds di Dimarco Enzo & C. Sas, Centro Servizi di Barillà Marco, Assok di Rambaldi Stefano e Casbarra Luca Snc, Dg Comunicazioni di Di Giorno Giancarlo, Tamara Maraboli, Andrea Cappiello, Depa di Delberba C. Sas, Luca Campioni, Danio Milazzo, Andrea Menna, Emilio Schiavone, Sandro Casalboni, Lorena Bertora, Andromeda di Novellis Alessandro e Stellini Roberto Snc

Defendants: Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli di Stato

In the presence of: Carmelo Sisino, Gianni Viano, Vincenzo Brancati, Marco Decortes, Filippo Sangineto, Luca Piccolo, Salvatore Rosolia, Giada Aricò, Giuseppe Parrelli, Wett-Pads Vermittlungs, Galassio Game Srl

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that in issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders relating to licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past due to a reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates.


(1)  OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.
Case C-37/14: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015  — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — ‘Contingency plans’  — Fruit and vegetable sector — Unlawful aid incompatible with the internal market — Recovery — Failure to act)
Date: 2015-02-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, control of State aid, fruit, infringement of EU law, legality, marketing year, vegetable








C_2015118EN.01001001.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/10





Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — European Commission v French Republic
(Case C-37/14) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid - ‘Contingency plans’ - Fruit and vegetable sector - Unlawful aid incompatible with the internal market - Recovery - Failure to act))
(2015/C 118/13)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant: French Republic (represented by: J. Bousin, G. de Bergues and D. Colas, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Declares that, by having failed to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the measures necessary to recover from the beneficiaries of the State aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the internal market in Article 1 of Commission Decision 2009/402/EC of 28 January 2009 on the contingency plans in the fruit and vegetable sector implemented by France (C 29/05 (ex NN 57/05)) and by having failed to provide the European Commission, within the period prescribed, with the information listed in Article 4 of that decision, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the fourth paragraph of Article 288 TFEU and Articles 2 to 4 of that decision;










2)


Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.
Case C-336/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2015  — European Commission v IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH (Appeals — Commission decision ordering the repayment of financial assistance — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court of the European Union — Distinction between default interest and compensatory interest — Calculation of interest)
Date: 2015-02-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: enforcement of ruling, financial aid, interest, reimbursement of aid








C_2015118EN.01000302.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/3





Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — European Commission v IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH
(Case C-336/13 P) (1)

((Appeals - Commission decision ordering the repayment of financial assistance - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court of the European Union - Distinction between default interest and compensatory interest - Calculation of interest))
(2015/C 118/04)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac, G. Wilms and G. Zavvos, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH (represented by: C. Pitschas, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in IPK International v Commission (T-671/11, EU:T:2013:163) to the extent that it orders the default interest payable by the European Commission to IPK International — World Marketing Consultants GmbH to be fixed on the basis of the amount of the principal debt, plus the interest that has already accrued;










2)


Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;










3)


Orders that the default interest payable by the European Commission to IPK International — World Marketing Consultants GmbH be calculated solely on the basis of the amount of the principal debt;










4)


Orders the European Commission and IPK International — World Marketing Consultants GmbH to bear their own costs in relation to the present proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.
Case T-71/15: Action brought on 12 February 2015 — Jaguar Land Rover v OHIM — Nissan Jidosha (Land Glider)
Date: 2015-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015118EN.01003801.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/38





Action brought on 12 February 2015 — Jaguar Land Rover v OHIM — Nissan Jidosha (Land Glider)
(Case T-71/15)
(2015/C 118/48)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Jaguar Land Rover Ltd (Coventry, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Ingerl, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nissan Jidosha KK (Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa-ken, Japan)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Land Glider’ — Community trade mark application No 8 3 24  196

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 December 2014 in Case R 1415/2013-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-35/14 P: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — Enercon GmbH v Gamesa Eólica SL, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Appeal brought by an ‘other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal’ which did not lodge a response before the General Court — Not an intervener before the General Court — Appeal manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2015-02-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wind energy








C_2015213EN.01001202.xml










29.6.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/12





Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — Enercon GmbH v Gamesa Eólica SL, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Case C-35/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Appeal brought by an ‘other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal’ which did not lodge a response before the General Court - Not an intervener before the General Court - Appeal manifestly inadmissible))
(2015/C 213/18)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Enercon GmbH (represented by: J. Eberhardt, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: Gamesa Eólica SL (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, abogado), Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the order







1)


The appeal is dismissed.










2)


Enercon GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Gamesa Eólica SL.










3)


The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.
Case T-66/15: Action brought on 12 February 2015 — Alsharghawi v Council
Date: 2015-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: South Africa, common foreign and security policy, free movement of persons, international sanctions, powers of the institutions (EU), rights of the defence








C_2015146EN.01003901.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/39





Action brought on 12 February 2015 — Alsharghawi v Council
(Case T-66/15)
(2015/C 146/53)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Bashir Saleh Bashir Alsharghawi (Johannesburg, South Africa) (represented by: É. Moutet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Declare that the Council has failed to comply with its obligations under the FEU Treaty by not reviewing his situation;










—


Order the Council to review his situation;










—


Order the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging that by not acting on his application for review, the Council failed to comply with its obligations according to the legislation and case-law of the European Union.
Case C-651/13: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Lb Group Ltd v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Amministrazione Autonoma dei Monopoli di Stato (AAMS), Galassia Game Srl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure — Identical questions referred — Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Games of chance — National legislation — Reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates — New call for tenders — Licences with a shorter period than that of licences awarded in the past — Restriction — Overriding reasons of general interest — Proportionality)
Date: 2015-02-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, game of chance, invitation to tender, service concession








C_2015127EN.01000201.xml










20.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 127/2





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Lb Group Ltd v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Amministrazione Autonoma dei Monopoli di Stato (AAMS), Galassia Game Srl
(Case C-651/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Identical questions referred - Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Games of chance - National legislation - Reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences with a shorter period than that of licences awarded in the past - Restriction - Overriding reasons of general interest - Proportionality))
(2015/C 127/02)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Lb Group Ltd

Defendants: Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Amministrazione Autonoma dei Monopoli di Stato (AAMS), Galassia Game Srl

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that in issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders relating to licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past due to a reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates.


(1)  OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.
Case C-478/14: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Roberto Siddu (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure — Identical questions — Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Games of chance — National rules — Reorganisation of the licensing system through the alignment of licence expiry dates — New call for tenders — Licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past — Restriction — Compelling reasons of general interest — Proportionality)
Date: 2015-02-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, award of contract, freedom to provide services, game of chance, invitation to tender, principle of proportionality, right of establishment, service concession, transparency in decision-making








C_2015127EN.01000501.xml










20.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 127/5





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Roberto Siddu
(Case C-478/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Identical questions - Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Games of chance - National rules - Reorganisation of the licensing system through the alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past - Restriction - Compelling reasons of general interest - Proportionality))
(2015/C 127/06)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari — Italy

Criminal proceedings against

Roberto Siddu

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders concerning licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past on account of a reorganisation of the system through the alignment of licence expiry dates.


(1)  OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7424 — CCMP/INEOS/PQ)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2015-02-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, petrochemicals








C_2015049EN.01000102.xml










12.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 49/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7424 — CCMP/INEOS/PQ)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 49/02)
On 9 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7424. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.