do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Andorra to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2011)0908 — C8-0264/2014 — 2011/0443(NLE))
Date: 2015-02-11
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Andorra, EU relations, accession to an agreement, child protection, consultation procedure, custody, illegal restraint, international convention, parental responsibility, rights of access








C_2016310EN.01009201.xml










25.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/92





P8_TA(2015)0021
The accession of Andorra to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Andorra to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2011)0908 — C8-0264/2014 — 2011/0443(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2016/C 310/18)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2011)0908),










—


having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,










—


having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0264/2014),










—


having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice of 14 October 2014,










—


having regard to Rules 59 and 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0004/2015),












1.


Approves the proposal for a Council decision and approves the acceptance of the accession;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Andorra.
P8_TA(2015)0018 Common rules for imports ***I European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for imports (codified text) (COM(2014)0321 — C8-0012/2014 — 2014/0166(COD)) P8_TC1-COD(2014)0166 Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 11 February 2015 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2015/… of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for imports (codification)
Date: 2015-02-11
Institutions: Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: codification of EU law, import (EU), import restriction, ordinary legislative procedure, originating product, protective clause, surveillance concerning imports, third country








C_2016310EN.01008901.xml










25.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/89





P8_TA(2015)0018
Common rules for imports ***I
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for imports (codified text) (COM(2014)0321 — C8-0012/2014 — 2014/0166(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure — codification)
(2016/C 310/15)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2014)0321),










—


having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 207(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8-0012/2014),










—


having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 10 December 2014 (1),










—


having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (2),










—


having regard to Rules 103 and 59 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0040/2014),










A.


whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance;












1.


Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.






(1)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

(2)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.


P8_TC1-COD(2014)0166
Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 11 February 2015 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2015/… of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for imports (codification)

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EU) 2015/478.)
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Morocco to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2011)0916 — C8-0268/2014 — 2011/0451(NLE))
Date: 2015-02-11
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: EU relations, Morocco, accession to an agreement, child protection, consultation procedure, custody, illegal restraint, international convention, parental responsibility, rights of access








C_2016310EN.01009701.xml










25.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/97





P8_TA(2015)0026
The accession of Morocco to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Morocco to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2011)0916 — C8-0268/2014 — 2011/0451(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2016/C 310/23)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2011)0916),










—


having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,










—


having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0268/2014),










—


having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice of 14 October 2014,










—


having regard to Rules 59 and 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0005/2015),












1.


Approves the proposal for a Council decision and approves the acceptance of the accession;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Morocco.
Case T-204/11: Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2015  — Spain v Commission (Consumer protection — Regulation (EU) No 15/2011 — Methods for the detection of lipophilic toxins in bivalve molluscs — Replacement of the mouse bioassay method by the liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method — Article 168 TFEU — Proportionality — Legitimate expectations)
Date: 2015-02-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: consumer protection, food inspection, food safety, human nutrition, mollusc, principle of proportionality, toxic substance








C_2015096EN.01001101.xml










23.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/11





Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2015 — Spain v Commission
(Case T-204/11) (1)

((Consumer protection - Regulation (EU) No 15/2011 - Methods for the detection of lipophilic toxins in bivalve molluscs - Replacement of the mouse bioassay method by the liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method - Article 168 TFEU - Proportionality - Legitimate expectations))
(2015/C 096/12)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: initially M. Muñoz Pérez, subsequently S. Martínez-Lage Sobredo and lastly A. Rubio González, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández and A. Marcoulli, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 15/2011 of 10 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 2074/2005 as regards recognised testing methods for detecting marine biotoxins in live bivalve molluscs (OJ 2011 L 6, p. 3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 160, 28.5.2011.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Armenia to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2011)0917 — C8-0269/2014 — 2011/0452(NLE))
Date: 2015-02-11
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Armenia, EU relations, accession to an agreement, child protection, consultation procedure, custody, illegal restraint, international convention, parental responsibility, rights of access








C_2016310EN.01009801.xml










25.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/98





P8_TA(2015)0027
The accession of Armenia to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Armenia to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2011)0917 — C8-0269/2014 — 2011/0452(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2016/C 310/24)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2011)0917),










—


having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,










—


having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0269/2014),










—


having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice of 14 October 2014,










—


having regard to Rules 59 and 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0009/2015),












1.


Approves the proposal for a Council decision and approves the acceptance of the accession;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Armenia.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Seychelles to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2011)0909 — C8-0265/2014 — 2011/0444(NLE))
Date: 2015-02-11
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: EU relations, Seychelles, accession to an agreement, child protection, consultation procedure, custody, illegal restraint, international convention, parental responsibility, rights of access








C_2016310EN.01009301.xml










25.8.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/93





P8_TA(2015)0022
The accession of Seychelles to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Seychelles to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2011)0909 — C8-0265/2014 — 2011/0444(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2016/C 310/19)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2011)0909),










—


having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,










—


having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0265/2014),










—


having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice of 14 October 2014,










—


having regard to Rules 59 and 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0006/2015),












1.


Approves the proposal for a Council decision and approves the acceptance of the accession;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Seychelles.
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Eidsivating lagmannsrett dated 11 February 2015 in the case of Matja Kumba T. M’bye and Others v Stiftelsen Fossumkollektivet (Case E-5/15)
Date: 2015-02-11
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: EU law - national law, Norway, damage, dismissal, labour law, legal working time, social facilities








C_2015217EN.01002201.xml










2.7.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 217/22





Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Eidsivating lagmannsrett dated 11 February 2015 in the case of Matja Kumba T. M’bye and Others v Stiftelsen Fossumkollektivet
(Case E-5/15)
(2015/C 217/08)
A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter dated 11 February 2015 from Eidsivating lagmannsrett (Eidsivating Court of Appeal, Norway), which was received at the Court Registry on 13 February 2015, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Matja Kumba T. M’bye and Others v Stiftelsen Fossumkollektivet on the following questions:






1.


Is an average weekly working time of 84 hours (‘7-7 rotation’) in a cohabitant care arrangement in breach of Article 6, see also Article 22(1)(a), of the Working Time Directive (Directive 2003/88/EC)?










2.


Is a national provision, under which an employee’s consent to working more than 60 hours per week in a cohabitant care arrangement cannot be revoked, compatible with the rights that employees have under Article 6, see also Article 22, of the Working Time Directive?










3.


Is dismissal following a failure to consent to a working time arrangement of more than 48 hours over a seven-day period a sanction or ‘detriment’ within the meaning of Article 22(1)(a), see also (b), of the Working Time Directive?
Case C-62/15 P: Appeal brought on 11 February 2015 by DTL Corporación, S.L. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 9 December 2014 in Case T-176/13 DTL Corporación v OHIM
Date: 2015-02-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, energy industry, registered trade mark, renewable energy, trade-mark law








C_2015146EN.01001402.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/14





Appeal brought on 11 February 2015 by DTL Corporación, S.L. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 9 December 2014 in Case T-176/13 DTL Corporación v OHIM
(Case C-62/15 P)
(2015/C 146/22)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: DTL Corporación, S.L. (represented by: A. Zuazo Araluze, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


annul in part, in respect of all the goods and services in Classes 9 and 37, the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 24 January 2013 in Case R 661/2012-4 dismissing the appeal brought against the rejection of the application for Community trade mark No 8830821 ‘Generia’;










—


order OHIM and the other parties to the proceedings who oppose this appeal to pay the costs of this appeal.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Infringement of EU law by the General Court: The Fourth Board of Appeal changed, in its decision of 24 January 2013 in Case R 661/2012-4, the grounds for the decision of the Opposition Division for rejecting Community trade mark No 8830821 ‘Generia’ in respect of Classes 9 and 37. The Opposition Division had based that rejection on the similarity of the goods and services in Classes 9 and 37 with the goods of the opposing mark in Class 7. For its part, the Board of Appeal upheld the rejection, but on the ground of the similarity of the goods and services in Classes 9 and 37 with the services of the opposing mark in Class 40. In so doing, the Board of Appeal infringed Article 64(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) on the Community trade mark because the services of the opposing mark in Class 40 had never been put forward in opposition to the goods and services of the trade mark applied for in Classes 9 and 37 (although they were put forward against the services in other classes). In addition, the decision infringed Article 75 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark since the party now appealing was not invited to submit observations on that change to the grounds. The judgment under appeal maintains that the proceedings were legally correct, thereby infringing EU law (Articles 64(1) and 75 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark).


(1)  OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7491 — Lixil/Grohe)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2015-02-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: building materials, economic concentration, logistics, merger control








C_2015048EN.01000101.xml










11.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7491 — Lixil/Grohe)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 48/01)
On 2 February 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7491. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-621/13 P: Order of the Court of 11 February 2015 — Orange v European Commission, French Republic, Département des Hauts-de-Seine, Sequalum SAS (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Compensation for public service costs relating to the establishment and operation of a very-high-speed broadband electronic communications network)
Date: 2015-02-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, public service, services of general interest, transmission network








C_2015146EN.01000802.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/8





Order of the Court of 11 February 2015 — Orange v European Commission, French Republic, Département des Hauts-de-Seine, Sequalum SAS
(Case C-621/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - Compensation for public service costs relating to the establishment and operation of a very-high-speed broadband electronic communications network))
(2015/C 146/12)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Orange S.A. (represented by: D. Gillet and H. Viane, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromssky and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents), French Republic (represented by: J. Bousin and M.D. Colas, Agents), Departement des Hauts-de-Seine (represented by: G. O’Mahony, avocat), Sequalum SAS (represented by: L. Feldman, avocat)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Orange S.A. is ordered to pay the costs of the European Commission, French Republic, Département des Hauts-de-Seine, Sequalum SAS.






(1)  OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.
Case C-340/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — bpost SA v Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Postal services — Directive 97/67/EC — Article 12 — Universal service provider — Quantitative discounts — Application to intermediaries who consolidate postal items — Requirement of non-discrimination)
Date: 2015-02-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: discounting, equal treatment, postal service, provision of services, single market, universal service








C_2015118EN.01000401.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/4





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — bpost SA v Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT)
(Case C-340/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Postal services - Directive 97/67/EC - Article 12 - Universal service provider - Quantitative discounts - Application to intermediaries who consolidate postal items - Requirement of non-discrimination))
(2015/C 118/05)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: bpost SA

Defendant: Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT)

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of non-discrimination in postal tariffs laid down in Article 12 of Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service, as amended by Directive 2008/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008, must be interpreted as not precluding a system of quantitative discounts per sender, such as that at issue in the main proceedings.


(1)  OJ C 233, 10.8.2013.