do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-63/15: Action brought on 9 February 2015 — Shoe Branding Europe v OHIM (Parallel stripes)
Date: 2015-02-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, footwear industry, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_2015107EN.01003702.xml










30.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/37






Action brought on 9 February 2015 — Shoe Branding Europe v OHIM (Parallel stripes)
(Case T-63/15)
(2015/C 107/49)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Shoe Branding Europe BVBA (Oudenaarde, Belgium) (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark (representation of two parallel stripes) — Application for registration No 10 926 764

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 December 2014 in Case R 2560/2013-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea(s) in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/202 of 9 February 2015 amending Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire
Date: 2015-02-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, derogation from EU law, international sanctions, trade restriction




L_2015033EN.01003701.xml










10.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 33/37








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2015/202
of 9 February 2015
         
amending Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 29 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/656/CFSP (1).












(2)


A derogation from the prohibition on the sale, supply, transfer or export of equipment which might be used for internal repression should be introduced in order to enable the sale, supply, transfer or export of certain items solely for civilian use in mining or infrastructure projects.












(3)


Further action by the Union is necessary in order to implement that measure,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
In Decision 2010/656/CFSP, the following Article is inserted:

‘Article 1a
Article 1 shall not apply to the sale, supply, transfer or export of certain equipment which might be used for internal repression where the equipment is solely for civilian use in mining or infrastructure projects, subject to authorisation on a case by case basis by the competent authorities of the exporting Member State.’
.

Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 9 February 2015.


For the Council


The President

F. MOGHERINI
            





(1)  Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP of 29 October 2010 renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire (OJ L 285, 30.10.2010, p. 28).
Case C-2/15 SA: Application for authorisation to serve an attachment order brought on 9 February 2015  — ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias v European Commission
Date: 2015-02-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Greece, credit, deduction at source, executive agency, regional development








C_2015118EN.01001401.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/14





Application for authorisation to serve an attachment order brought on 9 February 2015 — ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias v European Commission
(Case C-2/15 SA)
(2015/C 118/18)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


authorise ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias to effect the attachment of assets of the Commission in Greece, in order to achieve satisfaction of the claim for the amount of EUR 6  752,74, together with interest on late payment calculated from 12.8.2010 until its full and complete payment, at an interest rate of 1 % per annum;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.
Case T-64/15: Action brought on 9 February 2015 — Shoe Branding Europe v OHIM (Parallel slanted stripes)
Date: 2015-02-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, footwear industry, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_2015107EN.01003801.xml










30.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/38






Action brought on 9 February 2015 — Shoe Branding Europe v OHIM (Parallel slanted stripes)
(Case T-64/15)
(2015/C 107/50)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Shoe Branding Europe BVBA (Oudenaarde, Belgium) (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark (representation of two parallel slanted stripes) — Application for registration No 10 984 102

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 December 2014 in Case R 2563/2013-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea(s) in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
Date: 2015-02-09
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice (EU)








C_2015046EN.01000101.xml










9.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/1





Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 046/01)

Last publication


OJ C 34, 2.2.2015


Past publications


OJ C 26, 26.1.2015


OJ C 16, 19.1.2015


OJ C 7, 12.1.2015


OJ C 462, 22.12.2014


OJ C 448, 15.12.2014


OJ C 439, 8.12.2014

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
Case T-657/14: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2015 — Spain v Commission
Date: 2015-02-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Regional Development Fund, Spain, operational programme, research and development








C_2015107EN.01003902.xml










30.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/39






Order of the General Court of 9 February 2015 — Spain v Commission
(Case T-657/14) (1)

(2015/C 107/52)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 380, 27.10.2014.
Case C-59/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Catanzaro (Italy) lodged on 9 February 2015 — Esse Di Emme Costruzioni Srl v Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Calabria, Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze
Date: 2015-02-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, Italy, access to the courts, administrative court, fundamental rights, interpretation of the law, right to justice








C_2015138EN.01003501.xml










27.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/35





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Catanzaro (Italy) lodged on 9 February 2015 — Esse Di Emme Costruzioni Srl v Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Calabria, Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze
(Case C-59/15)
(2015/C 138/47)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Catanzaro

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Esse Di Emme Costruzioni Srl

Defendants: Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Calabria, Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze

Question referred

Is it contrary to the principle laid down by Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, made applicable to the sphere of procurement contracts by Article 1 of Council Directive 89/665/EEC (1), that everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal, for a provision of national law, such as that set out in Articles 9, 13 and 14 of Decree of the President of the Republic No 115 of 30 May 2002, applicable to the circumstances of the case, to provide, for access to administrative court proceedings relating to procedures for the award of public contracts, for payment of a greater amount of a standard fee than that fixed for access to administrative court proceedings in other spheres?


(1)  Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (OJ 1989 L 395, p. 33).
Case F-23/15: Action brought on 9 February 2015 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2015-02-09
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, disciplinary proceedings, staff regulations (EU)








C_2015127EN.01004202.xml










20.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 127/42





Action brought on 9 February 2015 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-23/15)
(2015/C 127/60)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision imposing a disciplinary penalty on the applicant consisting of a reprimand.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of 15 April 2014 of the appointing authority applying the disciplinary penalty of a reprimand to the applicant;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, pursuant to Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal.
Opinion of the European Central Bank of 9 February 2015 on amendments to Eesti Pank’s Statute (CON/2015/6)
Date: 2015-02-09
Institutions: European Central Bank
Subjects: Estonia, central bank, competence of the institution, national law

EN 

ECB-PUBLIC 

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK 

of 9 February 2015  

on amendments to Eesti Pank’s Statute 

(CON/2015/6) 

Introduction and legal basis 

On 21 January 2015 the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from Eesti Pank for an opinion 

on a draft decision of Eesti Pank’s Supervisory Board to recast Eesti Pank’s Statute (hereinafter the ‘draft 

decision’). 

The ECB’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Articles 127(4) and 282(5) of the Treaty on the 
Functioning of the European Union and the third indent of Article 2(1) of Council Decision 98/415/EC1, as 

the draft decision relates to a national central bank. In accordance with the first sentence of Article 17.5 of 

the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank, the Governing Council has adopted this opinion. 

1.  

Purpose of the draft decision 

The existence of the Statute is a requirement under the Law on Eesti Pank. The Statute supplements the 

Law on Eesti Pank in areas that are not explicitly regulated by it and in particular sets out (a) principles for 

the division of tasks among and the functioning of Eesti Pank’s decision-making bodies, (b) principles for 

the functioning of Eesti Pank’s structural units, and (c) a number of internal administrative rules. The draft 

decision recasts Eesti Pank’s Statute without amending its substance.  

2. 

General observations  

The ECB welcomes the draft decision, as it improves the clarity of Eesti Pank’s Statute. 

This opinion will be published on the ECB’s website.  

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 9 February 2015. 

[signed] 

The President of the ECB 

Mario DRAGHI 

1  

Council  Decision  98/415/EC  of  29 June  1998  on  the  consultation  of  the  European  Central  Bank  by  national 
authorities regarding draft legislative provisions (OJ L 189, 3.7.1998, p. 42).
Case C-57/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 9 February 2015 — United Video Properties Inc. v Telenet NV
Date: 2015-02-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, EU law - national law, consultancy, expenditure, interpretation of the law, legal process








C_2015138EN.01003401.xml










27.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/34





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 9 February 2015 — United Video Properties Inc. v Telenet NV
(Case C-57/15)
(2015/C 138/46)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: United Video Properties Inc.

Respondent: Telenet NV

Questions referred







1.


Do the terms ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs and other expenses’ in Article 14 of the Enforcement Directive (1) preclude the Belgian legislation which offers courts the possibility of taking into account certain well-defined features specific to the case and which provides for a system of varying flat rates in respect of costs for the assistance of a lawyer?










2.


Do the terms ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs and other expenses’ in Article 14 of the Enforcement Directive preclude the case-law which states that the costs of a technical adviser are recoverable only in the event of fault (contractual or extra-contractual)?






(1)  Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45).