do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine
Date: 2015-02-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Ukraine, capital movement, economic sanctions, international sanctions








C_2015045EN.01000101.xml










7.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/1





Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine
(2015/C 45/01)
The following information is brought to the attention of Ms Olena Leonidivna Lukash, Mr. Viktor Ivanovych Ratushniak, Mr. Dmytro Volodymyrovych Tabachnyk and Ms Raisa Vasylivna Bohatyriova, persons appearing under nos. 6, 8, 16 and 17 in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine.
Following a review of the list of designated persons in Decision 2014/119/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 208/2014, the Council intends to renew the measures in those acts. The Council has also amended the criteria for designation in those acts by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/143 (3) and Council Regulation (EU) 2015/138 (4).
The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons with a new statement of reasons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons and the elements the Council holds in its file regarding their designation, before 13 February 2015, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu






(1)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 26.

(2)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 24, 30.1.2015, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 24, 30.1.2015, p. 16.
Acknowledgement of receipt of complaint CHAP(2014) 1984
Date: 2015-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, Spain, extraction of oil, hydrocarbon, petroleum exploration








C_2015045EN.01000601.xml










7.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/6





Acknowledgement of receipt of complaint CHAP(2014) 1984
(2015/C 45/04)






1.


The European Commission has received a series of complaints about the plans of the Government of Spain for investigation, prospecting and exploitation of hydrocarbons in various areas of the Mediterranean Sea and Atlantic Ocean.










2.


The Commission has registered these complaints in the central application for the registration of complaints on the application of Union law by a Member State under reference number CHAP(2014) 1984.










3.


Given the significant number of complaints it received on this subject, the Commission, with a view to responding swiftly and informing those concerned while making the most economical use of its administrative resources, is publishing this acknowledgment of receipt in the Official Journal of the European Union, and on the Internet at: http://ec.europa.eu/eu_law/complaints/receipt/index_en.htm










4.


The complainants will be informed, through the same channels, of the results of the Commission's examination of these complaints and of the follow-up that the Commission may decide to take.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015045EN.01000201.xml










7.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

6 February 2015
(2015/C 45/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1447




JPY


Japanese yen


134,28




DKK


Danish krone


7,4441




GBP


Pound sterling


0,74730




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4565




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0534




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,5715




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,698




HUF


Hungarian forint


306,27




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1650




RON


Romanian leu


4,4143




TRY


Turkish lira


2,7878




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4572




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4246




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8739




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5414




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5377




KRW


South Korean won


1 244,86




ZAR


South African rand


12,9486




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1535




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,7170




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 430,56




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,0347




PHP


Philippine peso


50,573




RUB


Russian rouble


76,8600




THB


Thai baht


37,237




BRL


Brazilian real


3,1536




MXN


Mexican peso


16,8843




INR


Indian rupee


70,6442






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-57/15: Action brought on 4 February 2015 — Trajektna luka Split v Commission
Date: 2015-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, infringement of EU law, terms for aid








C_2015118EN.01003501.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/35





Action brought on 4 February 2015 — Trajektna luka Split v Commission
(Case T-57/15)
(2015/C 118/44)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Trajektna luka Split d.d. (Split, Croatia) (represented by: M. Bauer, H.-J. Freund and S. Hankiewicz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Commission decision C(2013) 7285 final — Croatia — Alleged aid to Jadrolinija of 15 October 2014;










—


order the Commission to bear its own costs and those of the applicant;










—


refer the case back to the European Commission for further investigation and renewed decision; and










—


take such other or further actions as justice may require.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and error of law by infringing Article 107 TFEU in finding that the disputed measure does not constitute State aid because the wrong test was applied to establish whether State resources were involved.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and error of law by infringing Article 107 TFEU in finding that the disputed measure does not constitute State aid due to the lack of State resources being involved.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging manifest error of law by infringing the concept of Article 107(1) TFEU in conjunction with Article 106(1) TFEU by failure to consider Article 106(1) TFEU.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging an infringement of an essential procedural requirement by infringing Article 10(2) of Regulation No 659/1999 (1) in not sufficiently making use of investigation powers provided thereunder.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment by failing to open the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU and Article 4(4) of Regulation No 659/1999.










6.


Sixth plea in law, alleging an infringement of an essential procedural requirement by failing to state sufficient reasons pursuant to Article 296(2) TFEU with regard to the lack of State resources and the concept of Article 106(1) in conjunction with Article 107(1) TFEU.






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 83, p. 1).