do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Police Office for the financial year 2014 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training
Subjects: EU expenditure, Europol, amending budget, budgetary resources, publication of accounts








C_2015043EN.01001801.xml










6.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 43/18





Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Police Office for the financial year 2014 — Amending Budget No 1
(2015/C 43/05)

REVENUE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2014


Amending budget No 1


New amount





9






REVENUE





9 0


SUBSIDIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS


84 249 589


 


84 249 589




9 1


HOST STATE CONTRIBUTION


p.m.


 


p.m.




9 2


OTHER REVENUE


p.m.


90 231


90 231




 



Title 9 — Total




84 249 589




90 231




84 339 820





 



GRAND TOTAL




84 249 589




90 231




84 339 820






EXPENDITURE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2014


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






STAFF





1 1


STAFF IN ACTIVE EMPLOYMENT


51 201 589


90 231


51 291 820




1 2


ADMINISTRATIVE MISSIONS


p.m.


 


p.m.




1 3


SOCIOMEDICAL INFRASTRUCTURE


910 000


 


910 000




1 4


TRAINING


250 000


 


250 000




1 5


OTHER STAFF-RELATED EXPENDITURE


1 909 000


 


1 909 000




1 6


ENTERTAINMENT AND REPRESENTATION EXPENSES


83 000


 


83 000




 



Title 1 — Total




54 353 589




90 231




54 443 820






2






OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE





2 0


RENTAL OF BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


4 368 000


 


4 368 000




2 1


ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY


1 346 000


 


1 346 000




2 2


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


734 000


 


734 000




2 3


CURRENT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE


290 000


 


290 000




2 4


POSTAL CHARGES AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS


345 000


 


345 000




2 5


STATUTORY EXPENDITURE


1 118 000


 


1 118 000




 



Title 2 — Total




8 201 000



 



8 201 000






3






OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES





3 0


OPERATIONS


4 831 000


 


4 831 000




3 1


OPERATIONAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY


12 464 000


 


12 464 000




3 2


TELECOMMUNICATION COSTS FOR OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES


2 150 000


 


2 150 000




3 3


SECONDED NATIONAL EXPERTS (OPERATIONAL)


2 000 000


 


2 000 000




3 4


EPCC/COSI


150 000


 


150 000




3 5


HEADS OF EUROPOL NATIONAL UNITS


100 000


 


100 000




3 6


OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE RELATED TO SUBSIDIES AND GRANTS


p.m.


 


p.m.




 



Title 3 — Total




21 695 000



 



21 695 000





 



GRAND TOTAL




84 249 589




90 231




84 339 820
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015042EN.01000101.xml










6.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

5 February 2015
(2015/C 42/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1410




JPY


Japanese yen


133,98




DKK


Danish krone


7,4456




GBP


Pound sterling


0,74820




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4579




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0587




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,6370




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,708




HUF


Hungarian forint


307,24




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1655




RON


Romanian leu


4,4133




TRY


Turkish lira


2,7898




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4616




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4290




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8455




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5428




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5359




KRW


South Korean won


1 243,16




ZAR


South African rand


12,9830




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1307




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,7128




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 389,78




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,0605




PHP


Philippine peso


50,343




RUB


Russian rouble


76,2700




THB


Thai baht


37,213




BRL


Brazilian real


3,1238




MXN


Mexican peso


16,8862




INR


Indian rupee


70,4436






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-7/14 P: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2015  — BQ v Court of Auditors (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Staff report — Psychological harassment — Dismissal in part of the action for compensation at first instance — Distortion of the facts — Duty of the Civil Service Tribunal to state reasons — Proportionality — Allocation of costs)
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, indemnification, principle of proportionality, psychological harassment, report, staff assessment








C_2015096EN.01001802.xml










23.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/18





Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2015 — BQ v Court of Auditors
(Case T-7/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Staff report - Psychological harassment - Dismissal in part of the action for compensation at first instance - Distortion of the facts - Duty of the Civil Service Tribunal to state reasons - Proportionality - Allocation of costs))
(2015/C 096/23)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: BQ (Béreldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: D. de Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and M. de Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented initially by: T. Kennedy, B. Schäfer and I. Ni Riagáin Düro, and subsequently by: B. Schäfer and I. Ni Riagáin Düro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 23 October 2013, BQ v Court of Auditors (F-39/12, ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:158) seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr BQ to bear, in the present instance, his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Court of Auditors.






(1)  OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.
Case C-52/15 P: Appeal brought on 6 February 2015 by Arthur Lambauer against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 December 2014 in Case T-490/14, Arthur Lambauer v Council of the European Union
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Ukraine, access to EU information, provision of documents, right to justice








C_2015337EN.01000201.xml










12.10.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 337/2





Appeal brought on 6 February 2015 by Arthur Lambauer against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 December 2014 in Case T-490/14, Arthur Lambauer v Council of the European Union
(Case C-52/15 P)
(2015/C 337/02)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Arthur Lambauer

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union
By order of 3 September 2015 the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear his own costs.
Notice from the French authorities to the European Commission pursuant to Article 9(4) of Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: France
Subjects: EU control, France, diesel fuel, energy consumption, minimum stock, petrol, petroleum, security of supply








C_2015042EN.01000201.xml










6.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/2





Notice from the French authorities to the European Commission pursuant to Article 9(4) of Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products
(2015/C 42/02)
In accordance with Article 9(4) of Council Directive 2009/119/EC of 14 September 2009 imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products (1), the French authorities are pleased to provide the Commission with the following information.






1.


The level of specific stocks the French authorities undertake to maintain is equivalent to 30 days of average daily consumption.










2.


This commitment applies to the period from 1 February 2015 to 31 January 2016.










3.


The specific stocks will be composed of the following product categories:






—


motor gasoline,










—


kerosene-type jet fuel, and










—


gas/diesel oil (distillate fuel oil).










(1)  OJ L 265, 9.10.2009, p. 9.
Case T-61/15: Action brought on 6 February 2015 — 1&1 Internet v OHIM — Unoe Bank (1e1)
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet site, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015107EN.01003601.xml










30.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/36






Action brought on 6 February 2015 — 1&1 Internet v OHIM — Unoe Bank (1e1)
(Case T-61/15)
(2015/C 107/47)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: 1&1 Internet AG (Montabaur, Germany) (represented by: G. Klopp, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Unoe Bank, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘1e1’ — Application No 11 047 479

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 in Case R 101/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision relating to opposition proceedings No B 002090507 between 1&1 Internet AG and UNO E Bank;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-53/15 P: Appeal brought on 6 February 2015 by Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, S.A. against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-426/10 and T-575/10 and in Case T-440/12 Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías v Commission
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: exchange of information, fine, fixing of prices, infringement of EU law, market-sharing agreement, restriction on competition, steel








C_2015118EN.01001901.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/19





Appeal brought on 6 February 2015 by Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, S.A. against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-426/10 and T-575/10 and in Case T-440/12 Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías v Commission
(Case C-53/15 P)
(2015/C 118/25)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, S.A. (represented by: F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the order of the General Court of 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-426/10 and T-575/10 and in Case T-440/12 Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías v Commission;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs of the present proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the appellant puts forward a single ground of appeal.
The appellant claims that the General Court erred in law in assessing the legal interest of Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, S.A. in bringing proceedings, as regards both the action for annulment in Case T-575/10 against the decision of the Commission of 30 September 2010 amending Decision C(2010) 4387 (final) relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing Steel), and the amendment of the pleas in law and forms of order sought in Case T-426/10 in relation to the decision of the Commission of 30 September 2010 amending Decision C(2010) 4387 (final) relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing Steel).
Information on the date of signature of the Protocol agreed between the European Union and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the two parties currently in force
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Guinea-Bissau, agreement (EU), financial compensation of an agreement, fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing rights, protocol to an agreement, sea fishing, signature of an agreement








L_2015030EN.01000101.xml










6.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 30/1








Information on the date of signature of the Protocol agreed between the European Union and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the two parties currently in force


On 24 November 2014, the Protocol agreed between the European Union and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the two parties currently in force was signed.
The Protocol applies provisionally from 24 November 2014, date of signature, in accordance with its Article 18.
Case T-60/15: Action brought on 6 February 2015 — Laboratorios Ern v OHIM — Dermogen Farma (ETERN JUVENTUS)
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pharmaceutical industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015107EN.01003501.xml










30.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/35






Action brought on 6 February 2015 — Laboratorios Ern v OHIM — Dermogen Farma (ETERN JUVENTUS)
(Case T-60/15)
(2015/C 107/46)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Laboratorios Ern, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: T. González Martínez, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dermogen Farma, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ETERN JUVENTUS’ — Application for registration No 10 862 548

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 November 2014 in Case R 2414/2013-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 November 2014 in Case R 2414/2013-1 in relation to the partial granting of the trade mark application for the following services: Class 35 ‘Retailing, wholesaling and sale via global computer networks of dentifrices; sole agencies and business representation relating to dentifrices’;










—


refuse Community trade mark application No 10 862 548 ‘ETERN JUVENTUS’ for ‘Retailing, wholesaling and sale via global computer networks of dentifrices; sole agencies and business representation relating to dentifrices’ in Class 35; and










—


order OHIM, and if applicable, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-47/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 6 February 2015  — Sélina Affum (Amissah by marriage) v Préfet du Pas de Calais, Procureur général de la Cour d'appel de Douai
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, Schengen Agreement, foreign national, illegal migration, interpretation of the law








C_2015118EN.01001801.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/18





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 6 February 2015 — Sélina Affum (Amissah by marriage) v Préfet du Pas de Calais, Procureur général de la Cour d'appel de Douai
(Case C-47/15)
(2015/C 118/24)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Sélina Affum (Amissah by marriage)

Defendants: Préfet du Pas de Calais, Procureur général de la Cour d'appel de Douai

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 3(2) of Directive 2008/115 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a third-country national is staying illegally in the territory of a Member State and thus falls within the scope of that directive, as defined in Article 2(1) thereof, where that foreign national is merely in transit as a passenger on a coach travelling in the territory of that Members State from another Member State forming part of the Schengen area and bound for a different Member State?










2.


Is Article 6(3) of Directive 2008/115 to be interpreted as meaning that that directive does not preclude national legislation under which a third-country national who entered the territory of a Member State illegally is liable to a term of imprisonment where the foreign national in question may be taken back by another Member State pursuant to an agreement or an arrangement concluded with that State prior to the entry into force of the directive?










3.


Depending on the answer given to Question 2, is Directive 2008/115 to be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which a third-country national who entered the territory of a Member State illegally is liable to a term of imprisonment under the same conditions as those laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment in Achughbabian (C-329/11) (2) in so far as concerns illegal stay, which are contingent on the person concerned not having been previously subject to the coercive measures referred to in Article 8 of the directive and the duration of that person’s detention?






(1)  Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98).

(2)  EU:C:2011:807.
Case T-248/12: Order of the General Court of 6 February 2015  — Fuhr v Commission
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, administrative sanction, building services, cartel, restriction on competition








C_2015096EN.01002401.xml










23.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/24





Order of the General Court of 6 February 2015 — Fuhr v Commission
(Case T-248/12) (1)

(2015/C 096/30)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
Case C-54/15 P: Appeal brought on 6 February 2015 by Trefilerías Quijano, S.A. against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-427/10 and T-576/10 and in Case T-439/12 Trefilerías Quijano v Commission
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: exchange of information, fine, fixing of prices, infringement of EU law, market-sharing agreement, restriction on competition, steel








C_2015118EN.01002001.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/20





Appeal brought on 6 February 2015 by Trefilerías Quijano, S.A. against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-427/10 and T-576/10 and in Case T-439/12 Trefilerías Quijano v Commission
(Case C-54/15 P)
(2015/C 118/26)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Trefilerías Quijano, S.A. (represented by: F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the order of the General Court of 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-427/10 and T-576/10 and in Case T-439/12 Trefilerías Quijano v Commission;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs of the present proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the appellant puts forward a single ground of appeal.
The appellant claims that the General Court erred in law in assessing the legal interest of Trefilerías Quijano SA in bringing proceedings, as regards both the action for annulment in Case T-576/10 against the decision of the Commission of 30 September 2010 amending Decision C(2010) 4387 (final) relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing Steel), and the amendment of the pleas in law and forms of order sought in Case T-427/10 in relation to the decision of the Commission of 30 September 2010 amending Decision C(2010) 4387 (final) relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing Steel).
Case C-56/15 P: Appeal brought on 6 February 2015 by Global Steel Wire, S.A. against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-429/10 and T-578/10 and in Case T-438/12 Global Steel Wire v Commission
Date: 2015-02-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: exchange of information, fine, fixing of prices, infringement of EU law, market-sharing agreement, restriction on competition, steel








C_2015118EN.01002101.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/21





Appeal brought on 6 February 2015 by Global Steel Wire, S.A. against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-429/10 and T-578/10 and in Case T-438/12 Global Steel Wire v Commission
(Case C-56/15 P)
(2015/C 118/28)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Global Steel Wire, S.A. (represented by: F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the order of the General Court of 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-429/10 and T-578/10 and in Case T-438/12 Global Steel Wire v Commission;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs of the present proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the appellant puts forward a single ground of appeal.
The appellant claims that the General Court erred in law in assessing the legal interest of Global Steel Wire in bringing proceedings, as regards both the action for annulment in Case T-578/10 against the decision of the Commission of 30 September 2010 amending Decision C(2010) 4387 (final) relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing Steel), and the amendment of the pleas in law and forms of order sought in Case T-429/10 in relation to the decision of the Commission of 30 September 2010 amending Decision C(2010) 4387 (final) relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing Steel).