do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-33/13: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2015  — Türkiye Garanti Bankasi AS v OHIM — Card & Finance Consulting (bonus & more) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark bonus & more — Earlier international figurative mark bonus net — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-02-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, bank, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015096EN.01001401.xml










23.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/14





Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2015 — Türkiye Garanti Bankasi AS v OHIM — Card & Finance Consulting (bonus & more)
(Case T-33/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark bonus & more - Earlier international figurative mark bonus net - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 096/17)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Türkiye Garanti Bankasi AS (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: J. Güell Serra, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially by A. Pohlmann, then by A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Card & Finance Consulting GmbH (Nuremberg, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 November 2012 (Case R-1890/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Türkiye Garanti Bankasi AS and Card & Finance Consulting GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 12 November 2012 (Case R 1890/2011-4).










2.


Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Türkiye Garanti Bankasi AS.






(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 780/2013 of 14 August 2013 amending Commission Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 laying down lists of third countries, territories or parts thereof authorised for the introduction into the European Union of certain animals and fresh meat and the veterinary certification requirements ( OJ L 219, 15.8.2013 )
Date: 2015-02-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: health certificate, import (EU), import licence, live animal, third country, transit, veterinary inspection








L_2015029EN.01001601.xml










5.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 29/16







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 780/2013 of 14 August 2013 amending Commission Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 laying down lists of third countries, territories or parts thereof authorised for the introduction into the European Union of certain animals and fresh meat and the veterinary certification requirements

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 219 of 15 August 2013
)


On page 9 in the Annex, model veterinary certificate RUM-A, point II.1.6 ‘Rift valley fever’, third section, last line:
for:

               ‘… within 10 days of dispatch to the Union.’,
read:

               ‘… within 10 days prior to dispatch to the Union.’
Case T-570/10 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2015  — Environmental Manufacturing v OHIM — Wolf ( representing a wolf’s head ) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark representing a wolf’s head — Earlier national and international figurative marks WOLF Jardin and Outils WOLF — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-02-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, machine-tool industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015096EN.01001001.xml










23.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/10





Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2015 — Environmental Manufacturing v OHIM — Wolf (representing a wolf’s head)
(Case T-570/10 RENV) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark representing a wolf’s head - Earlier national and international figurative marks WOLF Jardin and Outils WOLF - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 096/11)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Environmental Manufacturing LLP (Stowmarket, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and M. Atkins, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court, being: Société Elmar Wolf (Wissembourg, France) (represented by: N. Boespflug, avocat)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 October 2010 (Case R 425/2010-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Société Elmar Wolf and Environmental Manufacturing LLP.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 October 2010 (Case R 425/2010-2);










2.


Orders OHIM to bear its own costs before the General Court and the Court of Justice, as well as half of those incurred by Environmental Manufacturing LLP before the General Court and the Court of Justice;










3.


Orders Société Elmar Wolf to bear its own costs before the General Court and the Court of Justice, as well as half of those incurred by Environmental Manufacturing before the General Court and the Court of Justice.






(1)  OJ C 63, 26.2.2011.
Case T-473/12: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2015  — Aer Lingus v Commission (State aid — Irish tax on air passengers — Lower rate for destinations no more than 300 km from Dublin — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Advantage — Selective nature — Identification of the beneficiaries of the aid — Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2015-02-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Ireland, State aid, aid recipient, air transport, carriage of passengers, control of State aid, excise duty, passenger tariff, reduced price








C_2015096EN.01001202.xml










23.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/12





Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2015 — Aer Lingus v Commission
(Case T-473/12) (1)

((State aid - Irish tax on air passengers - Lower rate for destinations no more than 300 km from Dublin - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Advantage - Selective nature - Identification of the beneficiaries of the aid - Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Obligation to state reasons))
(2015/C 096/15)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Aer Lingus Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: K. Bacon, D. Scannell, D. Bailey, Barristers, and A. Burnside, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, D. Grespan and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Ireland (represented by: E. Creedon, A. Joyce and J. Quaney, acting as Agents, assisted by E. Regan SC, and B. Doherty, Barrister)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2013/199/EU of 25 July 2012 on State aid Case SA.29064 (11/C, ex 11/NN) — Differentiated air travel tax rates implemented by Ireland (OJ 2013 L 119, p. 30).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Article 4 of Commission Decision 2013/199/EU of 25 July 2012 on State aid Case SA.29064 (11/C, ex 11/NN) — Differentiated air travel tax rates implemented by Ireland, in so far as it orders the recovery of the aid from the beneficiaries for an amount which is set at EUR 8 per passenger in recital 70 of that decision;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs, as well as half of the costs incurred by Aer Lingus Ltd;










4.


Orders Aer Lingus to pay half of its own costs;










5.


Orders Ireland to pay its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
Case C-117/14: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 23 de Madrid — Spain) — Grima Janet Nisttahuz Poclava v Jose María Ariza Toledano (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — National legislation providing for an employment contract of indefinite duration with a probationary period of one year — Implementation of EU law — None — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2015-02-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, EU law - national law, jurisdiction, temporary employment, working conditions








C_2015107EN.01001302.xml










30.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/13






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 23 de Madrid — Spain) — Grima Janet Nisttahuz Poclava v Jose María Ariza Toledano
(Case C-117/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - National legislation providing for an employment contract of indefinite duration with a probationary period of one year - Implementation of EU law - None - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court))
(2015/C 107/17)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 23 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Grima Janet Nisttahuz Poclava

Defendant: Jose María Ariza Toledano

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the Juzgado de lo Social No 23 de Madrid (Spain) by decision of 4 March 2014.


(1)  OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.
Case F-21/15: Action brought on 5 February 2015 — ZZ v Committee of the Regions
Date: 2015-02-05
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, allowances and expenses, damages, indemnification, interest, overtime, wage determination








C_2015127EN.01004102.xml










20.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 127/41





Action brought on 5 February 2015 — ZZ v Committee of the Regions
(Case F-21/15)
(2015/C 127/58)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Defendant: Committee of the Regions

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision finding that the applicant could not, since his promotion to grade AST 5, claim the fixed-rate allowance for working overtime and application for material and non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought







—


Annul decision No 0112/2014 removing the applicant’s fixed-rate allowance for working overtime with effect from 1 July 2014, adopted on 3 June 2014 by the Acting Director of Administration and Finance;










—


Order the Committee of the Regions to pay the applicant that allowance again with effect from the same date, together with interest at the rate of the ECB’s refinancing operations on the amount corresponding to allowances that are not granted to him, from the date on which they should have been paid until payment in full;










—


Order the Committee of the Regions to pay the applicant compensation for the material harm which he may incur from the contested decision — a sum provisionally estimated at EUR 1  000 — and as compensation for non-material damage a sum to be assessed by the Tribunal;










—


Order the Committee of the Regions to pay the costs.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7319 — KKR/Allianz/Selecta)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2015-02-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, investment company, machine-tool industry, merger control








C_2015039EN.01000101.xml










5.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7319 — KKR/Allianz/Selecta)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 39/01)
On 14 November 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7319. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/273/13 — Lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — English-language (EN)
Date: 2015-02-05
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, competition (EU), legal person, linguistics








CA2015039EN.01000101.xml










5.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 39/1





RESERVE LIST (1)

Open competition — EPSO/AD/273/13 — Lawyer-linguists (AD 7)
English-language (EN)
(2015/C 039 A/01)
 






CAPOGROSSO


Claire




CUFF


Rachel




HARRIS HESS


Tessa




MACKENZIE


Gordon




MAMDANI


Geoffrey Aasif




MORRIS


Adeline




SKUNDRIC


Marija




TAYLOR


Nicholas




UPHOFF


Jonathan




The reserve list will be valid until 20 December 2017.


(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.