do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-252/12: Order of the General Court of 4 February 2015 — Gretsch-Unitas and Gretsch-Unitas Baubeschläge v Commission
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: bolt and screw industry, fine, glass, restriction on competition








C_2015107EN.01003901.xml










30.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/39






Order of the General Court of 4 February 2015 — Gretsch-Unitas and Gretsch-Unitas Baubeschläge v Commission
(Case T-252/12) (1)

(2015/C 107/51)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7493 — National Grid/Elia/Nemo JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical industry, gas industry, merger control








C_2015038EN.01000102.xml










4.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7493 — National Grid/Elia/Nemo JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 38/02)
On 29 January 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7493. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 1220/2012 of 3 December 2012 on trade related measures to guarantee the supply of certain fishery products to Union processors from 2013 to 2015, amending Regulations (EC) No 104/2000 and (EU) No 1344/2011 (OJ L 349, 19.12.2012)
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: fishery product, food processing, import (EU), suspension of customs duties, tariff quota








L_2015028EN.01004801.xml










4.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 28/48







Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 1220/2012 of 3 December 2012 on trade related measures to guarantee the supply of certain fishery products to Union processors from 2013 to 2015, amending Regulations (EC) No 104/2000 and (EU) No 1344/2011

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 349 of 19 December 2012
)


On page 7, Annex, Order No 09.2792, third column ‘TARIC Code’:
for:


                     ‘
                     1111
                     ’
                  
,read:


                     ‘
                     11
                     ’
                  
.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7366 — Whirlpool / Indesit)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, household electrical appliance, merger control








C_2015038EN.01000101.xml










4.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7366 — Whirlpool / Indesit)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 38/01)
On 13 October 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7366. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-647/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour du travail de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Office national de l’emploi v Marie-Rose Melchior (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Conditions governing eligibility for unemployment benefit in a Member State — Taking into account periods of work completed as a member of the contract staff of an institution of the European Union which is established in that Member State — Treatment of days of unemployment for which an allowance is paid under the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities as working days — Principle of sincere cooperation)
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: seat of institution, servant (EU), unemployment insurance








C_2015107EN.01001102.xml










30.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/11






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour du travail de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Office national de l’emploi v Marie-Rose Melchior
(Case C-647/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security - Conditions governing eligibility for unemployment benefit in a Member State - Taking into account periods of work completed as a member of the contract staff of an institution of the European Union which is established in that Member State - Treatment of days of unemployment for which an allowance is paid under the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities as working days - Principle of sincere cooperation))
(2015/C 107/14)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour du travail de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Office national de l’emploi

Respondent: Marie-Rose Melchior

Operative part of the judgment

Article 10 EC, in conjunction with the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities established by Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission, as amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004, precludes legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is interpreted as meaning that, in relation to eligibility for unemployment benefit, periods of work completed as a member of the contract staff in an institution of the European Union established in that Member State are not taken into account and days of unemployment which have given rise to payment of an unemployment allowance pursuant to the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities are not treated as working days although days of unemployment for which benefit has been paid under the legislation of that Member State are so treated.


(1)  OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.
Notice for the attention of the persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2015/157, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/147, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Tunisia, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2015038EN.01000201.xml










4.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/2





Notice for the attention of the persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2015/157, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/147, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia
(2015/C 38/03)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2015/157 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/147 (4) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia.
The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia.
The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be presented before 1 June 2015 and sent to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of a further review of the restrictive measures the Council will carry out before 31 July 2015.


(1)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

(2)  OJ L 26, 31.1.2015, p. 29.

(3)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 26, 31.1.2015, p. 3.
Case T-372/12: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2015  — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Apro Tech (APRO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark APRO — Earlier national figurative mark B-PRO by Boomerang, earlier Community word mark PRO MOUNTAIN and applications for earlier Community figurative and word marks B-PRO by Boomerang and PRO OUTDOOR — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, supermarket, trade-mark law








C_2015089EN.01001801.xml










16.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/18





Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2015 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Apro Tech (APRO)
(Case T-372/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark APRO - Earlier national figurative mark B-PRO by Boomerang, earlier Community word mark PRO MOUNTAIN and applications for earlier Community figurative and word marks B-PRO by Boomerang and PRO OUTDOOR - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 089/19)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela, J. Rivas Zurdo and I. Munilla Muñoz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Apro Tech Co. Ltd (Tachia, Taiwan)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 May 2012 (Case R 196/2011-2), relating to opposition proceedings between El Corte Inglés, SA and Apro Tech Co. Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders El Corte Inglés, SA, to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.
Case T-374/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2015  — KSR v OHIM — Lampenwelt (Moon) (Community trade mark — Proceedings seeking a declaration of invalidity — Community word mark Moon — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive nature — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, lighting equipment, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015089EN.01001902.xml










16.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/19





Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2015 — KSR v OHIM — Lampenwelt (Moon)
(Case T-374/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Proceedings seeking a declaration of invalidity - Community word mark Moon - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptive nature - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 089/21)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: KSR Kunststoff Rotation GmbH (Wehr, Germany) (represented by: H. Börjes-Pestalozza and M. Nielen, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: A. Pohlmann, subsequently by: D. Walicka, and finally by: A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Lampenwelt GmbH & Co. KG (Schlitz, Germany) (represented by: G. Rother, P. Mes, C. Graf von der Groeben, J. Künzel, J. Bühling, D. Jestaedt, M. Bergermann, A. Kramer, J. Vogtmeier and A. Verhauwen, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 May 2013 (Case R 676/2012-4) concerning invalidity proceedings between Lampenwelt GmbH & Co. KG and KSR Kunststoff Rotation GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders KSR Kunststoff Rotation GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.
Case T-58/15: Action brought on 4 February 2015  — Ludwig Bertram v OHIM — Seni Vita (Sanivita)
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, health care, medical device, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015118EN.01003601.xml










13.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/36





Action brought on 4 February 2015 — Ludwig Bertram v OHIM — Seni Vita (Sanivita)
(Case T-58/15)
(2015/C 118/45)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Ludwig Bertram GmbH (Isernhagen, Germany) (represented by: V. Rust-Sorge, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Seni Vita OHG (Bayreuth, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark No 9949959

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 November 2014 in Case R 1087/2013-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul the contested decision.

Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Call for proposals 2015 — EAC/A04/2014 — Erasmus+ Programme: Change of deadline for the submission of applications for Jean Monnet actions
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU programme, cooperation in the field of education, invitation to tender, student mobility








C_2015038EN.01002201.xml










4.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/22





Call for proposals 2015 — EAC/A04/2014 — Erasmus+ Programme: Change of deadline for the submission of applications for Jean Monnet actions
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 344 of 2 October 2014
)
(2015/C 38/08)
Point 5 ‘Deadline for the submission of applications’ has been amended as follows, as regards Jean Monnet actions:

‘Jean Monnet actions







Chairs, Modules, Centres of Excellence, Support to Institutions and Associations, Networks, Projects


26 March 2015’
Case T-52/15: Action brought on 4 February 2015 — Sharif University of Technology/Conseil
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, damages, ownership, repeal, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2015138EN.01005202.xml










27.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/52





Action brought on 4 February 2015 — Sharif University of Technology/Conseil
(Case T-52/15)
(2015/C 138/70)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sharif University of Technology (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: M. Happold, Barrister)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Annex to Council Decision 2014/776/CFSP, Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP, the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1202/2014, and Annex IX to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 insofar as they concern the applicant;










—


award the applicant a compensation to make good the damage to its reputation caused by the Council’s actions; and










—


order the Council to pay the applicant’s costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

By support of its action, the applicant seeks the annulment of the Annex to Council Decision 2014/776/CFSP (1), Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (2), the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1202/2014 (3), and Annex IX to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 (4) insofar as they concern the applicant.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
First plea in law, alleging that the Council has violated the applicant’s rights of the defence and its right to effective judicial protection;
Second plea in law, alleging that the Council has made manifest errors of assessment as regards its adoption of restrictive measures against the applicant;
Third plea in law, arguing that the Council has violated the applicant’s right to property and the principle of proportionality; and
Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Council has misused its powers in adopting restrictive measures against the applicant.


(1)  Council Decision 2014/776/CFSP of 7 November 2014 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ L 325, 19)

(2)  Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ L 195, 39)

(3)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1202/2014 of 7 November 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ L 325, 3)

(4)  Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ L 88, 1)
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,05 % on 1 February 2015 — Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, financing, interest








C_2015038EN.01000401.xml










4.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/4





Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
0,05 % on 1 February 2015
Euro exchange rates (2)

3 February 2015
(2015/C 38/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1376




JPY


Japanese yen


133,48




DKK


Danish krone


7,4440




GBP


Pound sterling


0,75395




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4118




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0526




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,6370




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,748




HUF


Hungarian forint


309,18




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1620




RON


Romanian leu


4,4033




TRY


Turkish lira


2,7382




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4799




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4316




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8214




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5742




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5362




KRW


South Korean won


1 251,26




ZAR


South African rand


13,0318




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1180




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,7090




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 358,41




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,0819




PHP


Philippine peso


50,136




RUB


Russian rouble


75,8145




THB


Thai baht


37,120




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0848




MXN


Mexican peso


16,8433




INR


Indian rupee


70,2086






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1287/2014 of 28 November 2014 amending and correcting Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 laying down detailed rules for implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 as regards the arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries (OJ L 348, 4.12.2014)
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agricultural product, import (EU), organic product, surveillance concerning imports, third country








L_2015028EN.01004802.xml










4.2.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 28/48







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1287/2014 of 28 November 2014 amending and correcting Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 laying down detailed rules for implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 as regards the arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 348 of 4 December 2014
)


On page 15, Annex II, point (8), in the table in point 3:
for:













‘China


CN-BO-154


x


X


x


x


x


x’





read:













‘China


CN-BIO-154


x


x


x


x


x


x’





On page 21, Annex II, point (14)(a), in the table in point 3:
for:













‘Argentina


AR-BIO-135


—


—


x


—


—


—’





read:













‘Argentina


AR-BIO-135


—


—


x


x


—


—’
Case T-62/15: Action brought on 4 February 2015 — Market Watch v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (MITOCHRON)
Date: 2015-02-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, toiletries, trade-mark law








C_2015107EN.01003701.xml










30.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/37






Action brought on 4 February 2015 — Market Watch v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (MITOCHRON)
(Case T-62/15)
(2015/C 107/48)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. (Freeport, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘MITOCHRON’ — Application for registration No 11 200 078

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 November 2014 in Case R 508/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Admit the complaint;










—


Annul the contested decision;










—


Order OHIM to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Inexistence of a risk of confusion between the trade marks involved in the dispute.