do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-322/13: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2015  — Tsujimoto v OHIM — Kenzo (KENZO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark KENZO — Earlier Community word mark KENZO — Relative ground for refusal — Reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Late submission of documents — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, automatic game, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015081EN.01001702.xml










9.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/17





Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2015 — Tsujimoto v OHIM — Kenzo (KENZO)
(Case T-322/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark KENZO - Earlier Community word mark KENZO - Relative ground for refusal - Reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Late submission of documents - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 081/22)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kenzo Tsujimoto (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: A. Wenninger-Lenz, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: M. Rajh and J. Crespo Carrillo, and subsequently by M. Rajh and P. Bullock, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Kenzo (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 March 2013 (Case R 1364/2012-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Kenzo and Mr Kenzo Tsujimoto.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Kenzo Tsujimoto to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1263/96 of 1 July 1996 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 on the registration of geographical indications and designations of origin under the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 ( OJ L 163, 2.7.1996 )
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agricultural product, consumer information, designation of origin, foodstuff, product designation








L_2015015EN.01010601.xml










22.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 15/106







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1263/96 of 1 July 1996 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 on the registration of geographical indications and designations of origin under the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92

(
Official Journal of the European Communities L 163 of 2 July 1996
)


On page 21, Annex, point A ‘Products intended for human consumption listed in Annex II to the Treaty’, Oils and fats, AUSTRIA:
for:

               ‘Steierisches Kürbiskernöl (PGI)’,
read:

               ‘Steirisches Kürbiskernöl (PGI)’.
Case T-133/13: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2015  — Pro-Aqua International v OHIM — Rexair (WET DUST CAN’T FLY) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark WET DUST CAN’T FLY — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, household electrical appliance, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015081EN.01001601.xml










9.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/16





Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2015 — Pro-Aqua International v OHIM — Rexair (WET DUST CAN’T FLY)
(Case T-133/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark WET DUST CAN’T FLY - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 081/20)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Pro-Aqua International GmbH (Ansbach, Germany) (represented by: T. Raible, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Rajh and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Rexair LLC (Troy, Michigan, United States of America) (represented by A. Bayer, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 December 2012 (Case R 211/2012-2), concerning invalidity proceedings between Pro-Aqua International GmbH and Rexair LLC.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Pro-Aqua International GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7458 — IBM/INF Business of Deutsche Lufthansa)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, software








C_2015020EN.01000101.xml










22.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 20/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.7458 — IBM/INF Business of Deutsche Lufthansa)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2015/C 20/01)
On 15 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7458. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-34/15: Action brought on 22 January 2015 — Wolf Oil v OHIM — SCT Lubricants (CHEMPIOIL)
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, fats, motor vehicle, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015089EN.01003801.xml










16.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/38





Action brought on 22 January 2015 — Wolf Oil v OHIM — SCT Lubricants (CHEMPIOIL)
(Case T-34/15)
(2015/C 089/46)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Wolf Oil Corp. (Hemiksem, Belgium) (represented by: P. Maeyaert and J. Muyldermans, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: UAB SCT Lubricants (Klaipeda, Lithuania)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark ‘CHEMPIOIL’ — International registration designating the European Union No 1 0 76  327

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 October 2014 in Case R 1596/2013-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order OHIM and the intervener to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Wolf Oil.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 75 and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-495/13 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2015 — GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Villiger Söhne GmbH (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Figurative mark in colour, consisting of the verbal components ‘LIBERTE american blend’ on a red background — Opposition by the holder of the Community trade mark ‘La LIBERTAD’ — Refusal of registration)
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, tobacco industry, trade-mark law








C_2015146EN.01000701.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/7





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2015 — GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Villiger Söhne GmbH
(Case C-495/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Figurative mark in colour, consisting of the verbal components ‘LIBERTE american blend’ on a red background - Opposition by the holder of the Community trade mark ‘La LIBERTAD’ - Refusal of registration))
(2015/C 146/09)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH (represented by: I. Memmler and S. Schultz, Rechtsanwältinnen)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent), Villiger Söhne GmbH (represented by: B. Pikolin, Rechtsanwätin)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/124 of 22 January 2015 establishing a prohibition of fishing for Sprat and associated by-catches in Union waters of IIa and IV by vessels flying the flag of Germany
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, Germany, North Sea, Norwegian Sea, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2015021EN.01000801.xml










28.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 21/8








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2015/124
of 22 January 2015
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for Sprat and associated by-catches in Union waters of IIa and IV by vessels flying the flag of Germany


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 (2) lays down quotas for 2014.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2014.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 January 2015.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).




ANNEX






No


85/TQ43




Member State


Germany




Stock


SPR/2AC4-C




Species


Sprat and associated by-catches (Sprattus sprattus)




Zone


Union waters of IIa and IV




Closing date


20.12.2014
Case T-32/15: Action brought on 22 January 2015  — GRE v OHIM (Mark1)
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, tobacco industry, trade-mark law








C_2015089EN.01003701.xml










16.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/37





Action brought on 22 January 2015 — GRE v OHIM (Mark1)
(Case T-32/15)
(2015/C 089/44)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH (Kloster Lehnin, Germany) (represented by: I. Memmler and S. Schulz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM


Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Mark1’ — Application No 1 2 0 52  437

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 October 2014 in Case R 647/2014-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-393/12: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2015  — Tsujimoto v OHIM — Kenzo (KENZO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark KENZO — Earlier Community word mark KENZO — Relative ground for refusal — Reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Duty to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Late submission of documents — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, automatic game, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2015081EN.01001502.xml










9.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/15





Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2015 — Tsujimoto v OHIM — Kenzo (KENZO)
(Case T-393/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark KENZO - Earlier Community word mark KENZO - Relative ground for refusal - Reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Duty to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Late submission of documents - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 081/19)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kenzo Tsujimoto (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: A. Wenninger-Lenz, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Kenzo (Paris, France) (represented by P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 May 2012 (Case R 1659/2011-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Kenzo and Mr Kenzo Tsujimoto.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Kenzo Tsujimoto to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.
Case C-496/13 P: Order of the Court of 22 January 2015 — GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Villiger Söhne GmbH (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Figurative mark in colour, consisting of the verbal components ‘LIBERTE american blend’ on a red background — Opposition by the holder of the Community trade mark ‘La LIBERTAD’ — Refusal of registration)
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, tobacco industry, trade-mark law








C_2015146EN.01000702.xml










4.5.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 146/7





Order of the Court of 22 January 2015 — GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Villiger Söhne GmbH
(Case C-496/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Figurative mark in colour, consisting of the verbal components ‘LIBERTE american blend’ on a red background - Opposition by the holder of the Community trade mark ‘La LIBERTAD’ - Refusal of registration))
(2015/C 146/10)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH (represented by: I. Memmler and Schulz, Rechtsanwältinnen)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent), Villiger Söhne GmbH (represented by: H. MacKenzie, Rechtsanwältin)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.
Case T-176/12: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2015  — Bank Tejarat v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment)
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Iran, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions, nuclear non-proliferation








C_2015081EN.01001401.xml










9.3.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/14





Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2015 — Bank Tejarat v Council
(Case T-176/12) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Error of assessment))
(2015/C 081/17)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Bank Tejarat (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: S. Zaiwalla, P. Reddy, F. Zaiwalla and Z. Burbeza, Solicitors, D. Wyatt QC, and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and S. Cook, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment in part, with immediate effect, of Council Decision 2012/35/CFSP of 23 January 2012, amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 19, p. 22), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2012 of 23 January 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 19, p. 1), of Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 709/2012 of 2 August 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 (OJ 2012 L 208, p. 2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls, in so far as they concern Bank Tejarat:






—


Point 2 of Table I.B in Annex I to Council Decision 2012/35/CFSP of 23 January 2012, amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP on restrictive measures against Iran;










—


Point 2 of Table I.B in Annex I to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2012 of 23 January 2012, implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on the adoption of restrictive measures against Iran;










—


Point 105 of Table I.B in Annex IX to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 on the adoption of restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010;










—


Point 5 of Annex II to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 709/2012 of 2 August 2012, implementing Regulation No 267/2012.














2.


Dismisses the remainder of the action;










3.


Declares that the effects of Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2012/35, are maintained as regards Bank Tejarat until the annulment of Regulation No 267/2012 and Implementing Regulation No 709/2012 takes effect;










4.


Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 174, 16.6.2012.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2015-01-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2015020EN.01000701.xml










22.1.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 20/7





Euro exchange rates (1)

21 January 2015
(2015/C 20/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1593




JPY


Japanese yen


136,07




DKK


Danish krone


7,4355




GBP


Pound sterling


0,76710




SEK


Swedish krona


9,4238




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9997




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,8250




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,939




HUF


Hungarian forint


315,35




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3058




RON


Romanian leu


4,5088




TRY


Turkish lira


2,7141




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4113




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3999




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9879




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5124




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5455




KRW


South Korean won


1 255,38




ZAR


South African rand


13,3846




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2017




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,7065




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 485,19




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1828




PHP


Philippine peso


51,444




RUB


Russian rouble


76,1230




THB


Thai baht


37,747




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0138




MXN


Mexican peso


16,9351




INR


Indian rupee


71,3839






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.